Page 65 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 65

Phytochemical and functional traits of Suaeda monoica

                observed between  amino  acids  and proteins  and the   Author contributions
                heavy metals Cu and Cd, whereas proline exhibited an
                inverse correlation with Pb. Furthermore, P positively   This is a single-authored article.
                correlated  with  Al,  Pb,  and  Zn.  Hence,  our  findings
                suggest that S. monoica can increase its amino acids,   Availability of data
                proteins,  and phosphorus production  in response to
                metal pollution. In addition, this plant may synthesize   Data of this study are available from the corresponding
                proline, an osmomodulator, depending on the intensity   author upon reasonable request.
                of metal contamination.
                                                                    References
                4. Conclusion
                                                                    1.  Shakthi A, Linoj J, Suresh V, Hussein M, Selvamani M.
                Physiological and biochemical responses of S. monoica   Evaluation  of antibacterial  and anti-oxidant  activities
                in Jeddah are significantly affected by the collection site.   of Suaeda monoica extract for its potential application.
                The observed variations  in photosynthetic  pigments,   Cureus. 2024;16(1):e53091.
                                                                        doi: 10.7759/cureus.53091
                osmoregulatory  compounds,  secondary  metabolites,     2.  Rajathi F, Arumugam R, Saravanan S, Anantharaman P.
                antioxidant capacity, nutrient content, and heavy metal   Phytofabrication of gold nanoparticles assisted by leaves
                accumulation show that plants can adapt and cope with   of  Suaeda monoica and its free radical  scavenging
                stress. Furthermore, the study explained the variation   property. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2014;135:75-80.
                in phytochemical profiles of S. monoica leaves across      doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.03.016
                different  collection  sites,  including  compounds  and   3.  Roy M,  Dutta  TK. Evaluation  of phytochemicals  and
                chemical  classes  unique  to  each  site.  Differential   bioactive  properties in mangrove  associate  Suaeda
                accumulations of components at different sites suggest   monoica  Forssk. ex  J.F.Gmel.  of  Indian  sundarbans.
                that  the plant  responds to environmental  conditions   Front. Pharmacol., 2021;12:e584019.
                differently,  with  implications  for  phytoremediation.      doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.584019
                These findings underscore the influence of environmental   4.  Aluri JSR, Kumar R, Chappidi PR. Reproductive biology
                factors on the qualitative and quantitative composition of   of mangrove plants  Clerodendrum inerme, Derris
                phytoconstituents in S. monoica extracts, emphasizing   trifoliata,  Suaeda maritima, Suaeda monoica, Suaeda
                                                                        nudiflora. Transylv Rev Syst Ecol Res. 2016;18(3):31-68.
                the need for site-specific considerations in phytochemical      doi: 10.1515/trser-2015-0092
                analyses and potential implications for phytoremediation,   5.  Ibraheem  F, Al-Zahrani  A,  Mosa A.  Physiological
                pharmacological applications, and ecological studies.   adaptation of three wild halophytic Suaeda species: Salt
                Moreover, the study unveiled that S. monoica exhibits   tolerance  strategies and metal  accumulation  capacity.
                potential as a model plant for afforestation initiatives and   Plants (Basel). 2022;11:e537.
                possibly for cultivating  economically  valuable  plants      doi: 10.3390/plants11040537
                in  contaminated  environments.  Further  research  into   6.  Lakshmanan  G, Rajeshkannan  C,  Kavitha  A,
                the molecular mechanisms underlying these responses     Mekala  B, Kamaladevi  N. Preliminary  screening  of
                could  enhance our knowledge  of plant-environment      biologically active constituents of Suaeda monoica and
                interactions  and inform sustainable environmental      Sesuvium portulocastrum from palayakayal  mangrove
                management practices.                                   forest  of Tamilnadu.  J  Pharmacogn  Phytochem.
                                                                        2013;2(3):149-152.
                Acknowledgments                                     7.  Elsharabasy FS, Metwall NS,  Mahmoud  AH,  et al.
                                                                        Phytoconstituents and hepatoprotective effect of Suaeda
                                                                        monoica Forssk and  Suaeda pruinosa Lange.  Biomed
                None.
                                                                        Pharmacol J. 2019;12:117-129.
                                                                        doi: 10.13005/bpj/1620
                Funding                                             8.  Joshi A, Kanthaliya  B, Rajput V, Minkina T, Arora J.
                                                                        Assessment of phytoremediation capacity  of three
                None.                                                   halophytes: Suaeda monoica, Tamarix indica and Cressa
                                                                        critica. Biol Futur. 2020;71:301-312.
                Conflict of interest                                    doi: 10.1007/s42977-020-00038-0
                                                                    9.  Ayyappan  D,   Ravindran  KC.   Potentiality  of
                The author declares no conflicts of interest.           Suaeda monoica Forsk.  A  salt marsh halophyte on



                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                        59                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8523
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70