Page 67 - ARNM-2-2

Advances in Radiotherapy
& Nuclear Medicine Optimal tube voltage for dental CBCT

dental computed tomography for paediatric patients. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.01.001
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20190032.
21. Holroyd JR. National reference doses for dental cephalometric
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190032 radiography. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1008):1121-1124.
11. Spin-Neto R, Matzen LH, Schropp L, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. doi: 10.1259/bjr/26420990
Factors affecting patient movement and re-exposure in cone 22. Stanley DN, Papanikolaou N, Gutierreza AN. Development
beam computed tomography examination. Oral Surg Oral of image quality assurance measures of the ExacTrac
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119(5):572-578. localization system using commercially available image
doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.01.011 evaluation software and hardware for image-guided
radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(6):81-91.
12. Shin HS, Nam KC, Park H, Choi HU, Kim HY, Park CS.
Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i6.4877
(cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry. 23. Elkhateeb SM, Torgersen GR, Arnout EA. Image quality
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(5):20130439. assessment of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130439 phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(5):20160075.
13. Li CL, Thakur Y, Ford NL. Comparison of the CTDI and doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160075
AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, 24. Karmazyn B, Liang Y, Klahr P, Jennings SG. Effect of tube
and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT voltage on ct noise levels in different phantom sizes. Am J
scanners. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017;4(3):031212. Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):1001-1005.
doi: 10.1117/1.jmi.4.3.031212 doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9828

14. Al-Ekrish AA. Effect of exposure time on the accuracy 25. Primak AN, McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Zhang J,
and reliability of cone beam computed tomography in the Fletcher JG. Relationship between noise, dose, and
assessment of dental implant site dimensions in dry skulls. pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. Radiographics.
Saudi Dent J. 2012;24(3-4):127-134. 2006;26(6):1785-1794.
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.05.001 doi: 10.1148/rg.266065063
15. Pauwels R, Silkosessak O, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H, 26. Akinlade BI, Farai IP, Okunade AA. Survey of dose
Panmekiate S. A pragmatic approach to determine the area product received by patients undergoing common
optimal kVp in cone beam CT: Balancing contrast-to-noise radiological examinations in four centers in Nigeria. J Appl
ratio and radiation dose. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(4):188-196.
2014;43(5):20140059.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3712
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140059
27. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Technical Quality Control
16. Zarb F, Rainford L, McEntee MF. Image quality assessment Protocol Handbook: Positron Emission Tomography/
tools for optimization of CT images. Radiography. Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Systems. Medical
2010;16(2):147-153. Radiation Surveillance Division; 2015. p. 1-142. Available
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2009.10.002 from: https://radia.moh.gov.my/project/new/radia/
filetransfer/downloads/files/65qc/protokol/pet_spect_non
17. Jadu FM, Hill ML, Yaffe MJ, Lam EWN. Optimization of imaging.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 18].
exposure parameters for cone beam computed tomography
sialography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(6):362-368. 28. Kareliotis G. Study of kVp and mAs Effect on Radiation dose
and Image Quality in Computed Tomography. Zografou:
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/81159071 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of
18. EFOMP-ESTRO-IAEA. Quality Control in Cone-beam Medicine; 2015.
Computed Tomography (CBCT) EFOMP-ESTRO-IAEA 29. Hidalgo-Rivas JA, Theodorakou C, Carmichael F, Murray B,
Protocol. Austria: EFOMP-ESTRO-IAEA; 2019. Payne M, Horner K. Use of cone beam CT in children and
19. Groenewald A. Design of a Universal Phantom for Quality young people in three United Kingdom dental hospitals. Int
Assurance in Diagnostic Radiology X-ray Imaging. PhD J Paediatr Dent. 2014;24(5):336-348.
thesis, Stellenbosch University; 2017. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12076
doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13548.00645 30. Muhogora W, Padovani R, Msaki P. Initial quality
performance results using a phantom to simulate chest
20. Ariga E, Ito S, Deji S, Saze T, Nishizawa K. Determination
of half value layers of X-ray equipment using computed computed radiography. J Med Phys. 2011;36(1):22-28.
radiography imaging plates. Phys Med. 2012;28(1):71-75. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.75468

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024) 7 doi: 10.36922/arnm.2972