Page 76 - ARNM-2-3
P. 76

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                       Association between PET-derived flows and angiography



            References                                            2012;19(4):670–680.

            1.   Murthy VL, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS,  et  al. Clinical      doi: 10.1007/s12350-011-9506-5
               quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET: Joint   10.  Schindler TH, Fearon WF, Pelletier-Galarneau M,
               position paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular council and   et al. Myocardial perfusion PET for the detection and
               the ASNC. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(2):273-293.          reporting of coronary microvascular dysfunction: A JACC:
               doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.201368                     cardiovascular imaging expert panel statement.  JACC
                                                                  Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;16:536-548.
            2.   Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF.
               Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion      doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.015
               imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/  11.  Parkash R, Ruddy T, Kitsikis A, Hart R, Beauschene   L,
               computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery   Williams K. Potential utility of rubidium 82 PET
               disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(10):1052-1058.  quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery
               doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.015                    disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:440-449.
            3.   Parker MW, Iskandar A, Limone B,  et al. Diagnostic      doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.04.005
               accuracy of  cardiac  positron emission  tomography  versus   12.  Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, et al. Improved cardiac risk
               single photon emission computed tomography for coronary   assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow
               artery  disease: A  bivariate meta-analysis.  Circ Cardiovasc   reserve. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2215-2224.
               Imaging. 2012;5(6):700-707.
                                                                  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.050427
               doi: 10.1161/circimaging.112.978270
                                                               13.  Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams KA,  et al. Impaired
            4.   Lee JM, Kim CH, Koo BK,  et al. Integrated myocardial   myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission
               perfusion imaging diagnostics improve detection of
               functionally  significant  coronary  artery  stenosis  by   tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients
               13N-ammonia positron emission tomography.  Circ    assessed for myocardial ischemia.  J  Am Coll Cardiol.
               Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(9):e004768.             2011;58(7):740-748.
               doi: 10.1161/circimaging.116.004768                doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.065
            5.   Valenta I, Quercioli A, Schindler TH. Diagnostic value   14.  Herzog  BA,  Husmann  L,  Valenta  I,  et al.  Long-term
               of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the   prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion
               identification of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc   positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow
               Imaging. 2014;7(4):387-396.                        reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(2):150-156.
               doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.01.001                    doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.069
            6.   Joutsiniemi E, Saraste A, Pietilä M, et al. Absolute flow or   15.  Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, et al. Coronary vascular
               myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant   dysfunction and prognosis in patients with chronic kidney
               coronary artery disease?  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.   disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(10):1025-1034.
               2014;15(6):659-665.                                doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.06.007
               doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet274                       16.  Murthy VL, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS,  et  al. Clinical
            7.   Hajjiri MM, Leavitt MB, Zheng H, Spooner AE, Fischman AJ,   quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET: Joint
               Gewirtz H. Comparison of positron emission tomography   position paper of the SNMMI cardiovascular council and
               measurement of adenosine-stimulated absolute myocardial   the ASNC. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25(1):269-297.
               blood flow versus relative myocardial tracer content for      doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1110-x
               physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity
               and location. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(6):751-758.  17.  Feher A, Srivastava A, Quail MA, et al. Serial assessment of
                                                                  coronary flow reserve by rubidium-82 positron emission
               doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.04.004                    tomography predicts mortality in heart transplant recipients.
            8.   Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C, et al. Diagnostic value of   JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(1_Part_1):109-120.
               N-13 ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: Added value of      doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.025
               myocardial flow reserve. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(8):1230-1234.
                                                               18.  Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem Carlos AG, Van Pelt N,
               doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101840                     et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery
            9.   Ziadi MC, DeKemp RA, Williams K, et al. Does quantification   stenoses. Computed tomography coronary angiography
               of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron   versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation
               emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel   with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.
               coronary artery disease? journal article.  J  Nucl Cardiol.   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(8):636-643.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         8                              doi: 10.36922/arnm.3786
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81