Page 92 - ARNM-2-4
P. 92

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                    Dose prescription and reporting in SRS



            D , conformity, homogeneity indexes, and dose-metrics   References
             99
            dependencies on the treatment site and RMP approach. Due   1.   Das IJ, Yadav P, Andersen AD,  et al. Dose prescription
            to the unification applied in our hospital during the last years,   and reporting in stereotactic body radiotherapy: A multi-
            the data demonstrated relatively low variability despite having   institutional study. Radiother Oncol. 2023;182:109571.
            some site- and planner-specific features. Our standardization
            advanced through the continuous implementation of auto-     doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109571
            contouring programs, treatment planning systems, and QA   2.   Schiff PB. Dose dissonance in radiation oncology: Consensus
            automation software, which allow the creation of templates   needed when prescribing dose in radiation therapy.  Pract
            for each step of the radiation treatment workflow. For   Radiat Oncol. 2017;7(6):e579-e580.
            example, organ nomenclature and dose-volume metrics can      doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.04.018
            be easily pre-defined for planning and reporting.
                                                               3.   Moustakis C, Blanck O, Ebrahimi F,  et al. Time for
              Further multi-institutional comparisons and the     standardization of SBRT planning through large scale
            adoption of standardized SBRT practices across countries   clinical data and guideline-based approaches. Zeit für
            and institutions could significantly accelerate the   eine Standardisierung der SBRT-Planung mithilfe großer
            availability of coherent clinical data, thereby enhancing   klinischer Datenmengen und leitlinienbasierter Ansätze.
                                                                  Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193(12):1068-1069.
            both the quality and efficiency of radiation therapy globally.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1216-8
            Acknowledgments                                    4.   Moustakis C, Blanck O, Ebrahimi Tazehmahalleh F, et al.

            None.                                                 Planning benchmark study for SBRT of early stage NSCLC:
                                                                  Results of the DEGRO Working Group  Stereotactic
            Funding                                               Radiotherapy. Planvergleichsstudie bei der SBRT des NSCLC
                                                                  im Frühstadium: Ergebnisse der DEGRO AG Stereotaxie.
            None.                                                 Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193(10):780-790.
            Conflict of interest                                  doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1151-8
            The authors declare they have no competing interests.  5.   Eaton DJ, Naismith OF, Henry AM. Need for consensus
                                                                  when prescribing stereotactic body radiation therapy for
            Author contributions                                  prostate  cancer.  Int  J  Radiat  Oncol  Biol  Phys. 2015;91(1)
                                                                  :239-241.
            Conceptualization: Salem Billan, Egor Borzov          doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.025
            Formal analysis: Egor Borzov
            Investigation: Egor Borzov                         6.   ICRU Report 91:  Prescribing,  Recording,  and  reporting of
            Methodology: Egor Borzov                              Stereotactic Treatments with Small Photon Beams; 2017.
            Writing–original draft: Egor Borzov                7.   Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Dieckmann K,  et al.
            Writing–review & editing: Tomer Charas, Raquel Bar-   ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on implementation and
               Deroma                                             practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripherally
                                                                  located  early  stage  non-small  cell  lung  cancer.  Radiother
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            Oncol. 2017;124(1):11-17.
            This research was approved by IRB as a retrospective data      doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.05.012
            analysis trial. The trial number is 0222-23-RMB-D.  8.   Moustakis C, Blanck O, Chan MKH,  et al. Planning
                                                                  benchmark study for  stereotactic body radiation therapy
            Consent for publication                               of liver metastases: Results of the DEGRO/DGMP working
            Not applicable.                                       group on stereotactic radiation therapy and radiosurgery.
                                                                  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;113(1):214-227.
            Availability of data                                  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.008

            Data are available from the corresponding author upon   9.   ICRU Report 83: Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting
            reasonable request.                                   Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
                                                                  (IMRT); 2010.
            Further disclosure                                 10.  Patel G, Mandal A, Choudhary S, Mishra R, Shende R. Plan
            Part of this study was presented as a Digital Poster in the   evaluation indices: A journey of evolution. Rep Pract Oncol
            FARO-ESTRO Congress @ ESTRO meets Asia 2024, Kuala    Radiother. 2020;25(3):336-344.
            Lumpur, Malaysia, August 23 – 25, 2024.               doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.002


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         5                              doi: 10.36922/arnm.5450
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97