Page 70 - ARNM-3-1
P. 70

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                        Aspirin’s protective effect on RISI



            3.2. Main cell type annotation and response to     IFE B was further differentiated into IFE B1 and IFE
            irradiation                                        B2, IFE D was differentiated into IFE D1 and IFE D2,
            Analysis  of  cell  populations  in  irradiated  versus  control   and the uHF was differentiated into uHFII, uHFIV, and
            groups revealed notable differences in the composition of   uHFVI cells, resulting in a total of 13 annotated subtypes
            major skin cell types. A total of 9,022 cells were classified   (Figure S1D-G, Figure 3B).
            into major cell types, including epithelial cells, fibroblasts,   The t-SNE plot visualization (Figure  3A) clearly
            T cells, monocytes, and endothelial cells, visualized using   shows the separation between these 13 subtypes, with
            t-SNE. Epithelial cells constituted the largest population,   clusters highlighted for each cell population. A  bar plot
            followed by fibroblasts, T cells, and other types (Figure 2A).   representation of cell numbers (Figure  3C) revealed
            Comparing control and irradiated groups, the average   variations in cell distributions between the control
            number of cells within each type showed significant changes,   and irradiated groups, while the cell proportion plot
            with a marked reduction in the number of epithelial cells   (Figure 3D) depicted distinct changes in the prevalence of
            in the irradiated group (Figure  2B). The proportion of   each subtype under irradiation conditions. Notably, despite
            cell types also varied, suggesting that radiation exposure   the overall reduction in cell number post-irradiation, the
            disproportionately affected specific cell populations,   number and proportion of IFE B1 cells were increased in
            reducing epithelial content while maintaining more stable   the  irradiated group compared  to the control  group. As
            levels of T cells and monocytes. Marker gene analysis   this is an intriguing observation, subsequent analyses were
            showed differential expression across cell types, with key   primarily focused on the IFE B cell population.
            markers such as Epcam, Cd44, Ly6c2, and Pecam1 being
            particularly notable. For example, Ly6c2, which is related   Further analysis examined the cell cycle distribution of
            to immune response, displayed elevated levels in irradiated   the two IFE B cell subtypes and revealed that the majority
            samples, indicating an increased presence of monocytes in   of  cells  in  the  G2M  phase  were  present  in  the  IFE  B1
            response to radiation-induced inflammation (Figure 2C).   subpopulation (Figure 3E and F). Compared to other IFE
            The t-SNE visualizations focusing on the expression of   B cells, IFE B1 cells exhibited higher expression levels of
            key marker genes across different cell types demonstrated   Cdk1 and Ccnb1, leading us to define these actively cycling
            significant radiation-induced changes. Epithelial cells and   cells as IFE Cycling (IFE C) cells (Figure  3G  and  H).
                                                                                                      21
            fibroblasts exhibited an upregulation of genes associated   We then analyzed stem cell marker expression  across
            with extracellular matrix remodeling, reflecting an attempt   different IFE cell subtypes, revealing that IFE C cells
            to  repair  radiation  damage,  potentially  contributing   exhibited the highest expression of the stem cell marker
            to fibrosis as part of the skin’s response (Figure  2D).   Krt14, suggesting the highest level of stemness within this
            Pathway analysis of DEGs across cell types highlighted the   subgroup (Figure 3I). In addition, comparing control and
            involvement of multiple key-signaling pathways, including   irradiated groups, we found that the expression of cell cycle
            “cornified envelope,” “extracellular matrix,” “chemokines,”   markers  Cdk1 and  Ccnb1 was reduced post-irradiation,
            “fatty acyl-CoA synthesis,” and “Rho GTPase” pathways.   whereas the expression of the stemness marker Krt14
            Notably, the “cornified envelope” and “extracellular matrix”   was elevated in the irradiated group (Figure 3J). Based on
            pathways  were  significantly  upregulated  in  irradiated   these observations, we hypothesize that IFE C cells serve
            epithelial cells, suggesting disruptions in skin barrier   as a reservoir for IFE cell populations. Upon irradiation,
            function and increased extracellular matrix activity – key   IFE C cells in mouse skin experience cell cycle arrest in
            features of the response to radiation injury (Figure 2E).  the G2M phase. However, should these cells successfully
                                                               bypass the G2M checkpoint, they could rapidly proliferate
            3.3. Cell subtype annotation analysis              and differentiate to replenish epidermal cells in the skin.
            The analysis of cell subtypes identified 13 distinct cell   3.4. Pseudotime analysis of IFE cells
            populations. This process was conducted in two major
            steps. Initially, using known skin cell markers, eight   A pseudotime analysis was performed on the major
            primary  cell  types  were  annotated,  including  IFE  B,   IFE cell populations to understand their differentiation
            IFE differentiated (IFE D), IFE K, infundibulum basal   trajectories. Figure 4 (A-C) shows the differentiation path
            (INFU B), outer bulge (OB), inner bulge (IB), SG, and   of IFE subtypes, with IFE C cells positioned upstream
            LH (Figure S1A-C). In the next step, four of these major   in  the differentiation process, confirming  our previous
            cell types underwent further characterization through   hypothesis that IFE C serves as an origin cell type for further
            comprehensive multigene expression analysis. This   differentiation. The trajectory visualization highlights that
            additional analysis allowed for finer differentiation of these   IFE C cells are found at the beginning of the differentiation
            groups, leading to the identification of specific subtypes :   path, with subsequent transitions to other subtypes.
                                                         19

            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                         62                             doi: 10.36922/arnm.5829
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75