Page 95 - EER-2-3
P. 95

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                    Comparative analysis of THMs and THAAs in water distribution media



            filtration system in a rapid, small-scale column test. The   organic matter (DOM) (using fluorescence spectrometry),
            two main chlorination DBPs—THMs and THAAs—were     temperature (measured  with a  thermometer),  and  water
            quantified using GC-MS (ECD), both with and without the   hardness (determined using the titration method), as
            application of filtration media.                   shown in Table 1.
            2. Materials and methods                           2.3. Setup

            2.1. Chemicals and reagents                        For all sampling procedures, appropriate glassware was
                                                               used throughout the entire analysis. Sampling containers
            Granular chlorine powder (calcium hypochlorite) was   were thoroughly washed with detergent, rinsed with
            obtained from the Water Quality Laboratory, Public Health   tap water, followed by ultrapure water, and then dried
            Engineering Department, KP, Pakistan. Two DBP standard   in an oven at 150°C for 1–2  h. Samples were collected
            compounds—chloroform and THAAs—were purchased      in 100  mL amber glass bottles with PP screw caps and
            from certified chemical suppliers in Pakistan. The solvent   tetrafluoroethylene-lined septa. Bottles were carefully
            for liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), ethyl acetate, was also   filled to avoid the presence of air bubbles.
            obtained from the Public Health Engineering Department,
            KP, Pakistan, and was used to separate solutes from water   In addition, a laboratory-scale pilot WDS was
            samples. Distilled water used throughout the study was   constructed to evaluate the effects of different chlorine
            obtained from the Water Quality Laboratory, Public Health   dosages. It consisted of pipe loops made of GI and HDPE,
            Engineering Department, KP, Pakistan. Fluorescence   as shown in Figure 2. Each loop measured approximately
            spectrometry was performed at the Central Resource   1.5–3 m in length, with a pipe diameter of 25 mm. The
            Laboratory, University of Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.  loops were equipped with ball valves, elbows, unions, and
                                                               sockets to monitor water flow behavior, as well as control
            2.2. Sampling site                                 pressure and velocity. They were also used to direct water

            In this study, multi-stage random sampling was employed   flow in the desired direction. Flow velocity was maintained
            to ensure systematic and representative sampling across all   between 0.2 m/s and 1.8 m/s. A 0.3 HP centrifugal pump
            three zones of District Mardan. Primary sampling units   (Model QB60, Taifu, Pakistan) was installed to ensure
            were selected in each zone—two in industrial zones and one   continuous water circulation.
            in  the controlled (non-industrial)  zone—to  identify  and   In the distribution network, a 0.189 m   (50-gallon)
                                                                                                   3
            quantify the formation of chlorination DBPs. In contrast,   water reservoir was used to receive water samples directly
            secondary sampling units consisted of two samples—one   from the field site. Special attention was given to collecting
            from the industrial zone and one from the controlled or   grab samples from different zones while monitoring
            non-industrial zone—which were used for the assessment   temperature and sunlight exposure using the mobile water
            of DBP abatement techniques through both quantitative   quality testing laboratory of the Public Health Engineering
            and qualitative analysis.
                                                               Department, KP. Before introducing water samples into
              In all three zones, groundwater was the selected   the pilot-scale laboratory distribution system, the system
            source, and elevated head tanks or overhead reservoirs   was rinsed with ultrapure water for 30 min to remove any
            were utilized to provide head elevation and facilitate   residual contaminants.
            water distribution to consumers. Tubewells served as the
            intake source at each site. The groundwater potential for   The methodology for operating the laboratory
            most sources was between 90 m and 120 m, with a static   distribution system consisted of four main steps: flushing,
            water level ranging from 18 to 30 m. The average yield per   Table 1. Summary of water sample characteristics and their
            tubewell was 6–8 m, and the discharge rate varied between   observed ranges
            0.00315 m /s and 0.00526 m /s. For consistency in sample
                                   3
                    3
            analysis, only water from tubewells older than 10  years,   Parameters                    Range
            connected to a minimum 5 km distribution network, was   pH                                7.2–7.8
            selected. All samples were collected at terminal (end-user)   Dissolved oxygen           5–5.7 mg/L
            points of the distribution system.
                                                               Turbidity                              1–3 NTU
              Before analysis with GC-MS (ECD), key water quality   Taste                              Fair
            parameters influencing DBP formation were measured.   Temperature                         30–38°C
            These included pH (using a pH meter), dissolved
            oxygen  (DO)  (using  a  DO meter), turbidity  (using a   Hardness                       Soft water
            nephelometer), taste (evaluated by taste test), dissolved   Dissolved organic matter    1.8–2.2 mg/L


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025)                         4                           doi: 10.36922/EER025240047
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100