Page 163 - EJMO-9-2
P. 163

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                                 Genetic insights into CAD drug targets



              The  initial  MR  analysis  was  conducted  using  the   p2 = 1E-4, p12 = 1E-5; where p1, p2, and p12 represent
            “TwoSampleMR”  package  (version  0.5.8) in  R  software   the predefined probabilities that an SNP is closely related
            (version 4.3.1). 14,15  To ensure the reliability of the genetic   to  gene  expression,  CA  risk,  or  both,  respectively. The
            instruments (IVs), a rigorous validation process was   posterior probabilities (PP) derived from the colocalization
            followed.  The  single  nucleotide  polymorphisms  (SNPs)   analysis correspond to one of five hypotheses: PPH : SNP
                                                                                                        0
            used as IVs were carefully selected based on their strong   is not associated with either trait; PPH : SNP is associated
                                                                                              1
            association with gene expression in the eQTL database   with  gene  expression  but  not  CA  risk;  PPH :  SNP  is
                                                                                                     2
            and their independence from confounding factors. For   associated with CA risk but not gene expression; PPH :
                                                                                                            3
            each instrument, we assessed whether it satisfied the   SNP is associated with both CA risk and gene expression
            key assumptions of MR, which include: (i) relevance   but is driven by different genetic variants; PPH : SNP is
                                                                                                      4
            assumption: each IV must be strongly associated    associated with both CA risk and gene expression and
            with the exposure (gene expression); (ii) exclusion   is driven by the same genetic variant. Colocalization
            restriction assumption: the IV must not influence   significance was determined with PPH  >0.70, indicating a
                                                                                              4
            the outcome (CA) through pathways other than the   colocalized relationship between the gene and CA, and was
            exposure; (iii) independence assumption: the IV must be   considered a potential drug target gene. 16
            independent of confounders, which could otherwise bias
            the causal inference.                              2.6. The GWAS data for plasma metabolites
              To assess and mitigate the effects of horizontal   The GWAS data for plasma metabolites were derived from
            pleiotropy, we applied MR Egger regression and used the   the Canadian longitudinal study on aging, which included
            Egger intercept test to detect any potential pleiotropic   8,299 participants, with 1,458 metabolites quantified using
            effects. If the Egger intercept test revealed a significant   the  Metabolon  HD4 platform  while retaining  samples
            pleiotropic effect (p<0.05), we considered the results   with <50% missing data. The study identified 309 pairs of
            with caution and reported them accordingly. In addition,   metabolites with shared enzymes or transporters through
            Cochran’s  Q  test  was  employed  to  detect  heterogeneity   the Human Metabolome Database and calculated the
            among  the  IVs.  A  significant  p-value  from  Cochran’s  Q   ratios of these metabolite pairs for further analysis. In total,
            test  (p<0.05)  indicated  the  presence  of heterogeneity,   1,400 metabolites were evaluated and classified into eight
            suggesting that the IVs may not be homogenous in their   categories, including amino acids, carbohydrates, lipids,
            effects. If heterogeneity was detected, we used the random-  etc.
            effects model in the IVW analysis to account for the   2.7. Mediation analysis
            variability between IVs. Conversely, when no significant
            heterogeneity was observed, a fixed-effects model was   This study employed a two-step MR (two-step MR)
            applied.                                           method for mediation analysis to assess whether plasma
                                                               metabolites  serve  as  mediators  in  the  causal  pathway
            2.4. SMR analysis and HEIDI test                   between druggable  genes  and  CA outcomes.  In the  first
            SMR is a method used to determine the causal relationship   step, the causal effect of druggable genes on the mediator
            between gene expression and CA, effectively reducing the   (Beta1) was calculated. Subsequently, in the second step, the
            influence of confounders on causal inference. The HEIDI   causal effect of the mediator on CA (Beta2) was evaluated.
            test is employed to assess whether the association between   The proportion of the mediation effect relative to the total
            gene expression and CA is caused by the same genetic   effect was calculated as R = (Beta1 ×  Beta2)/Beta0. The
            variant, thereby determining if it represents a colocalized   direct effect of exposure on the outcome was represented
            signal. The SMR analysis and HEIDI test were conducted   as Beta3 = Beta0 - Beta1 × Beta2.
            using SMR software (version 1.3.1). If the p-value of the   Beta0 represents the total causal effect of druggable
            SMR test is <0.05 and the  p-value of the HEIDI test is   genes on CA outcomes, encompassing both direct and
            >0.05, it indicates that the association is likely driven by a   mediated effects.
            shared genetic variant.
                                                               2.8. Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS)
            2.5. Colocalization analysis                       analysis
            For important MR results identified during the discovery   In this study, we conducted a PheWAS analysis to explore
            and validation process, colocalization analysis of CA risk   the pleiotropic effects and potential safety concerns of
            was conducted using the R package “coloc.” The analysis   candidate therapeutic targets.  PheWAS analysis was based
                                                                                      17
            used SNPs harmonized by the “TwoSampleMR” package,   on publicly available data resources, including the PheWAS
            with default prior probabilities set as follows: p1 = 1E-4,   portal (https://azphewas.com/). The databases provide


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2025)                        155                              doi: 10.36922/ejmo.7387
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168