Page 164 - EJMO-9-2
P. 164

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                                 Genetic insights into CAD drug targets



            extensive phenotypic data, which helps in evaluating   molecular docking  was employed  to  assess  binding
            the performance of potential drug targets across various   energy and interaction patterns between candidate
            phenotypes. In this study, the PheWAS dataset included   drugs and targets at the atomic level. Molecular docking
            more than 15,000 binary phenotypes and 1,500 continuous   simulations allowed us to evaluate the binding affinity
            phenotypes derived from individuals in the UK Biobank,   and interaction characteristics between ligands and
            including a subset with exome sequencing.          targets, thereby prioritizing those with high binding
              By analyzing these data, we systematically evaluated the   affinity and favorable interaction patterns for further
            role of candidate targets across different populations and   experimental validation and optimization. In this study,
            phenotypes, thereby identifying potential side effects and   molecular docking analysis of protein-ligand interactions
            pleiotropic features. Standard statistical analysis methods   was conducted using MOE 2019 software to simulate the
            were applied to detect associations between candidate gene   binding process between candidate drugs and proteins
            variants and multiple phenotypes, controlling for possible   encoded by the target genes. The three-dimensional
            confounding factors. This comprehensive PheWAS     structure data of the drugs were obtained from the
            analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the   PubChem  Compound  Database  (https://pubchem.ncbi.
            impact of genetic factors on complex phenotypes, offering   nlm.nih.gov/). The three-dimensional structure data of
            scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of candidate   the proteins were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank
            drug targets.                                      (PDB; http://www.rcsb.org/). The research design process
                                                               is displayed in Figure 1.
            2.9. Enrichment analysis
            To  explore the  functional characteristics  and biological   3. Results
            relevance of druggable genes, gene ontology (GO) and   3.1. Genes causally associated with CA risk during
            Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)     the discovery phase
            enrichment analyses were performed using the R package
            “clusterProfiler.”   The  GO  enrichment  analysis  included   In the discovery phase, we conducted MR analysis on
                         18
            three aspects: BPs, molecular function (MF), and cellular   atherosclerotic patients. The cohort study was sourced
            component (CC), which describe the functions of genes   from the GWAS catalog database, including 16,041 cases
            and the BPs they are involved in. KEGG analysis provided   and 440,307 controls. Using the IVW method and after
            information on metabolic pathways, helping to elucidate   FDR correction (FDR<0.05), 130 genes were identified as
            the specific functions of genes within biological systems   significantly associated with the risk of atherosclerosis. All
            and their roles in metabolic networks.             significant IVs and the complete results of the MR analysis
                                                               are summarized in Table S5.
            2.10. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network
            construction                                       3.2. Replication phase 9 genes remain significant in
            To better understand whether a protein interacts with   independent CA cohorts
            another protein within the cell, a PPI network was   In the replication phase, GWAS data from the Finnish
            constructed using STRING, and the network was further   FinnGen database (including 8,279  cases and 261,098
                                             19
            visualized using Cytoscape (V3.9.1).  In addition,   European-ancestry controls) and the UK Biobank database
            GeneMANIA was employed to study protein interactions.  (including  14,334  cases  and  346,860  European-ancestry
            2.11. Candidate drug prediction                    controls) were used. MR analysis was conducted similarly
                                                               to the discovery phase. Using the IVW method, 131 gene
            Assessing protein-drug interactions is crucial for   expressions and 78 genes (all of which passed heterogeneity
            determining the potential of target genes as drug targets.   and horizontal pleiotropy tests) were found to have a causal
            In this study, the drug signatures database (DSigDB;   relationship with CA risk (Tables S6 and S7). Subsequently,
            http://dsigdb.tanlab.org/DSigDBv1.0/) was used to analyze   a cross-analysis of potential drug targets identified across
            associations between drugs and compounds and the target   the three databases resulted in the identification of nine
            genes.  By inputting target genes, researchers were able to   unique potential druggable genes for CA (Figure 2).
                 20
            identify drugs or compounds significantly associated with
            these genes (Tables S2-S5, S21).                     For the nine unique potential drug genes, MR analysis
                                                               using cis-eQTLs from 49 tissues (GTEx V.8 version)
            2.12. Molecular docking                            suggested differences for  CHD4, tumor necrosis factor
            To further explore the effect of candidate drugs on   (TNF), FKRP, CD164L2, DHX36, lipoprotein lipase (LPL),
            target genes and evaluate the druggability of these genes,   FES, and TAF1A across tissues (p<0.05) (Tables S8-S10).


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2025)                        156                              doi: 10.36922/ejmo.7387
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169