Page 144 - GHES-2-4
P. 144

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                                    Silver economy and long-term care


            between long-term care expenditures and life expectancy   preventive, curative, and long-term care expenditures; these
            is expressed in the fact that the causal link between them   countries are in the high-income group. The year range was
            remains unproven. Without such evidence, the effects of   2004 – 2020, and 25 countries with regular data on long-term
            an increase/decrease in long-term care expenditures on life   care facility expenditures were identified: Austria, Belgium,
            expectancy may not be accurately estimated. There is no   Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
            detailed study on this issue using one-to-one parametric   Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Japan, South  Korea,
            methods; therefore, this study empirically analyzes   Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
            the  relationship  between  long-term  care  expenditures   Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States.
            and life expectancy. Econometric analyses allow us to
            empirically reveal the causal relationship between two   2.2. Statistical analysis
            or more variables. Econometric forecasting models are   EViews 10 software (EViews 10, IHS Global Inc., 4521
            one method to investigate future trends in spending and   Campus Drive, #336, Irvine, CA 92612) was used for
            demand for long-term care based on demographic data   statistical analysis.
            (Spielauer, 2001; Spielauer, 2011; Schneider & Buchinger,
            2009; Olivares-Tirado et al., 2011). To empirically test the   3. Results
            relationship between long-term care expenditures and life
            expectancy, this study’s research question was determined   The average LEAB was 79.75 ± 2.94 years (min: 70.60; max:
            as follows:                                        84.60), LEO65 was 14.75 ± 2.94 (min: 19.60; max: 5.60),
            Q : Is there a relationship between life expectancy and   and LTCFE was 350.37 ± 325.96 per capita/PPP (min: 1.37;
             1                                                 max: 1,669.19) (Figure 1).
               long-term care expenditures? If so, to what extent and
               in what direction does life expectancy affect long-term   LEAB increased by 2 – 9% over 16 years in the countries
               care expenditures?                              included in this study. In 16 years, the LEO65 increased
                                                               from 10% to 20% in Austria, Belgium, Canada, France,
            2. Methods                                         Germany, Greece, Iceland, Japan, Netherlands, Poland,
            This study used panel data analysis to investigate the   Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland. It increased by 21 – 50% in
            relationship between life  expectancy and  long-term  care   Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, South Korea,
            expenditures. LEAB and life expectancy at 65 years and   Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, and Slovenia and by 70
            over  (LEO65)  were  considered  independent  variables   – 90% in Estonia and Latvia. In the United States, LEO65
            representing the silver economy. Expenditures on   decreased by 5%. LTCFE increased by 16 – 19 times in Czech
            long-term care facilities (LTCFE) were considered the   Republic, Greece, and South Korea, whereas it decreased by
            dependent variable for long-term care expenditures. The   28% in Luxembourg. Table 1 shows the 16-year change in
            panel data method allows us to test many countries and   the variables subject to the research.
            multi-temporal data together. In this context, the analysis   The equation to define the econometric model is as
            was conducted in three stages. In the first stage, descriptive   follows:
            information about the variables subject to the research was
            given, and the significance tests of the econometric model
            were carried out using the least squares method. In the
            second stage, unit root tests were performed to determine
            the degree of stationarity of the variables. In the third
            stage, the lag length of the model was determined, and the
            causality relationship between the variables was analyzed
            with the Dumitrescu Hurlin (DH) panel causality test.
            2.1. Variables
            In this study, LEAB and LEO65 were determined as
            independent variables, and LTCFE (per capita, current
            prices, and current public-private partnerships [PPPs])
            was determined as the dependent variable within the
            scope of long-term care expenditures in health. Data on
            health expenditures were generally recorded as total health
            expenditures  at the  country  level. A  few countries follow
            classifications by health expenditure functions, such as   Figure 1. LTCFE, LEO65, and LEAB from 2004 to 2020


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         3                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3298
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149