Page 35 - GTM-2-3
P. 35

Global Translational Medicine                                           Deep learning by NMR-biochemical




            Table 1. Established NMR relaxation‑biochemical biomarkers as measured metabolite concentrations in normal brain, heart,
            muscle, and liver tissues
            NMR parameters  Brain             Heart               Muscle                 Liver
            T1            774±23 ms           946±30 ms           600±20 ms              448±20 ms
            T2            145±81 ms           68±9 ms             65±9 ms                88±7 ms
            Metabolite Peaks  • NAA 18 mM     • Cholesterol 13.5 mM  • Fatty Acids 29 mM  • Glutamine 36.1 mM
                          • Glx 7.2 mM        • Creatine 24 mM    • Phospholipids 26 mM  • Aspartate 6.27 mM
                          • Aspartate 2.3 mM
                          • Creatine 7.3 mM
            Tissue metabolites  • Lactate 146.6±8.8 µg%  • Cholesterol 175±5.8 mg%  • Triglycerides 30.2±8 mg%  • Triglycerides 89.7±4.8 mg%
                          • Pyruvate 98.8±3.5 µg%  • Triglycerides 106±8.1 mg%  • Phospholipids 139.7±12.4 mg%  • Phospholipids 113.8±3.9 mg%
                          • Acetoacetate 36.6±2.1 µg%  • Lactate 89.4±4.8 µg%
            Serum metabolites  • Lactate 24.8 µg%  • CK‑MB 19.5±2.4 IU  • Creatine Kinase 21.1±2.9 IU  • SGPT 18.5±1.9 IU
                          • Pyruvate 95.6 µg%  • SGOT 23.4±2.9 IU  • SGPT 13.6±1.4 IU    • Alkaline Pase 39.5±7.8 IU
                          • SGOT 23.4 IU      • Lactate 24.8±7.9 µg%                     • Bilirubin 1.5±0.2 mg%
            Abbreviations: CK‑MB: Creatine kinase‑myocardial band; Glx: Glutamine+glutamate, NAA: N‑acetylaspartate; SGOT: Serum glutamic‑oxaloacetic
            transaminase, SGPT: Serum glutamic‑pyruvic transaminase.

            and disease-specific metabolism) as trained non-invasive   case, DL features may enhance the theranostic accuracy in
            MR imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy supervised dataset   disease diagnosis and treatment, moving toward precision
            (biosignals), along with tissue-specific neuropsychological   medicine.
            tests  and organ function laboratory  tests  to define the   The  current  perspective  article  aims  to  construe  the
            structure and  physiochemical  or behavioral  nature of   interpretation of MRSI and hybrid imaging features in
            diseased soft tissues such as heart, muscle, kidney, breast,   physiochemical imaging and spectroscopy as a means
            prostate, liver, and brain for confirming disease behavior,   of “DL” in clinical trials on theranosis in light of meta-
            differential diagnosis, and monitoring purposes. The   analyses and previous clinical trials, if suitable, for
            author shares his opinion that T1 and T2 relaxation   precision medicine.
            constants, MRS peaks, and MRSI-produced NMR spectral
            diagnostic peaks and metabolite maps can be used to   The MRSI signal extracts the metabolic information
            monitor the metabolite distribution in tissues based on   from large areas of spatial MRI maps by optimization
            spectromics peak ratio, features of peak area at full-width   process to select diseased tissue volume with no external
            half-maximum half,  peak relaxivities,  peak  shape, peak   artifacts. The chemical shift encoding and readout
            cross-connectivity, and peak dynamics [2,3] . Over the years,   methods generate metabolite signals by suppressing water
            clinicians have routinely used integrated in vivo MR imaging   and lipids signals by fat saturation bands  [11,12] . Fast Fourier
            and spectroscopy to define quantitative changes in in vivo   transformation and fast pace transform signal processing
            organ  anatomy,  tissue  histology,  digital  histochemistry,   visualize chemical shift data from non-zero gyromagnetic
            perfusion, and metabolism for theranostic physiochemical   ratio nuclei of scarce metabolites, temperature, pH, and
                                                                               [12]
            specificity to improve clinical efficacy [4-6] . Due to the time-  tissue oxygenation . Now, high-speed localized 2D
            consuming data analysis, some research centers have   NMR-total correlation spectroscopy, localized-correlation
            adopted DL (integrating extracted and calculated biosignal   spectroscopy (COSY), and high-resolution magic angle
            changes as the footprint of specific disease status) data   spinning (HRMAS) acquisition with added second
            processing methods using 3D metabolic peaks/maps to   spectroscopic dimension can generate greater spectral
            reveal metabolite concentration profiles or metabolomics   peak discrimination and separated overlapping resonances
            as disease-specific fingerprints of focal lesions in human   at ultrahigh NMR spectrometers for DL, as shown in
                                                                     [13]
            heart, muscle, kidney, breast, prostate, liver, and brain   Figure 2 .
            diseases [2-7] . The disease burden as spatially and temporarily   Using DL, MRI processing, robust MRSI coregistration,
            averaged metabolite information is measured by 3D- and   atlas matching, and tissue segmentation methods
            4D-tissue metabolite concentrations distributed in human   improve diagnostic sensitivity by detecting a spatial
            brain  tumors,  muscle,  bone,  and  glands [8,9] .  Despite  all,   transformation of diseased tissue normalized MRSI data
            low NMR-visible metabolite concentrations in  in vivo   coordinates relative to normal or control tissue metabolite
            NMR spectra and poor metabolic maps of tissues still   concentrations in the matched region. Atlas matching
            show limited clinical value in federal guidelines. In this   identifies  brain regions for analysis of matching MRSI


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         3                         https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.337
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40