Page 80 - IJAMD-1-1

International Journal of AI
for Material and Design Machine learning for gripper state prediction

12. Nguyen VP, Dhyan SB, Mai V, Han BS, Chow WT. doi: 10.1089/soro.2018.0056
Bioinspiration and biomimetic art in robotic grippers. 22. Yeong WY, Goh GL, Goh GD, et al. 3D printing of soft
Micromachines (Basel). 2023;14(9):1772.
grippers with multimaterial design: Towards shape
doi: 10.3390/mi14091772 conformance and tunable rigidity. Mater Today Proceed.
2022;70:525-530.
13. Goh GL, Liang GG, Nguyen VP, et al. A 3D printing-enabled
artificially innervated smart soft gripper with variable joint doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.552
stiffness. Adv Mater Technol. 2023;8(24):2301426.
23. Goh GD, Lee JM, Goh GL, Huang X, Lee S, Yeong WY.
doi: 10.1002/admt.202301426 Machine learning for bioelectronics on wearable and
implantable devices: Challenges and potential. Tissue Eng
14. Goh GD, Goh GL, Lyu Z, et al. 3D printing of robotic soft
grippers: Toward smart actuation and sensing. Adv Mater Part A. 2023;29(1-2):20-46.
Technol. 2022;7(11):2101672. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2022.0119
doi: 10.1002/admt.202101672 24. Goh GL, Zhang H, Goh GD, Yeong WY, Chong TH. Multi-
15. Stork JA, Ek CH, Bekiroglu Y, Kragic D. Learning Predictive objective optimization of intense pulsed light sintering
State Representation for In-Hand Manipulation. United process for aerosol jet printed thin film. MSAM. 2022;1(2):10.
States, IEEE, 2015, p3207-3214. doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i2.10
doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139641 25. Goh GL, Goh GD, Pan JW, Teng PSP, Kong PW. Automated
service height fault detection using computer vision and
16. Hassan A, Abomoharam M. Modeling and design
optimization of a robot gripper mechanism. Robot Comput machine learning for badminton matches. Sensors (Basel).
Integr Manuf. 2017;46:94-103. 2023;23(24):9759.
doi: 10.3390/s23249759
doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2016.12.012
26. Zhang H, Cao R, Zilberstein S, Wu F, Chen X. Toward
17. Kuresangsai P, Cole MO, Hao G. Grasp stability and
design analysis of a flexure-jointed gripper mechanism via Effective Soft Robot Control Via Reinforcement Learning.
efficient energy-based modeling. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. Germany, Springer, 2017, p173-184.
2022;7(4):12499-12506. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65289-4_17
doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3220152 27. Kim D, Kim SH, Kim T, et al. Review of machine learning
methods in soft robotics. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246102.
18. Hussain I, Renda F, Iqbal Z, et al. Modeling and prototyping
of an underactuated gripper exploiting joint compliance and doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246102
modularity. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2018;3(4):2854-2861.
28. Chin K, Hellebrekers T, Majidi C. Machine learning
doi: 10.1109/LRA.2018.2845906 for soft robotic sensing and control. Adv Intell Syst.
2020;2(6):1900171.
19. Yang Y, Chen Y. 3D Printing of Smart Materials for Robotics
with Variable Stiffness and Position Feedback. United States, doi: 10.1002/aisy.201900171
IEEE, 2017, p418-423.
29. Zhou C, Guo H, Li J, et al. Temperature dependence
doi: 10.1109/AIM.2017.8014053 of poly (lactic acid) mechanical properties. RSC Adv.
2016;6(114):113762-113772.
20. Jiao J, Guo Y, Tong Q, et al. Stiffness-tunable and shape-
locking soft actuators based on 3D-printed hybrid multi- doi: 10.1039/C6RA23610C
materials. Soft Sci. 2022;2(4):20.
30. Al-Rubaiai M, Pinto T, González DT, Sepulveda N, Tan X.
doi: 10.20517/ss.2022.19 Characterization of a 3d-Printed Conductive Pla Material
with Electrically Controlled Stiffness. New York, American
21. Al-Rubaiai M, Pinto T, Qian C, Tan X. Soft actuators with
stiffness and shape modulation using 3D-printed conductive Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017, pV001T01A003.
polylactic acid material. Soft Robot. 2019;6(3):318-332. doi: 10.1115/SMASIS2017-3801

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024) 74 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijamd.2328