Page 23 - IJAMD-2-1
P. 23

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design
                                                                             Predicting thermal conductivity of sintered Ag


            ideal prediction trendline (red dashed line), indicating that   (i).  Image processing and modeling simulation methods for
            the predicted parameters are relatively close to the actual   SEM images of sintered nano-Ag microstructure were
            parameters. The value of R  is as high as 0.96, indicating   established by MATLAB and Ansys software. Batch
                                  2
            that the ANN model based on Bayesian optimization has a   calculation of the thermal conductivity from 2D images
            good predictive ability for the correlation analysis between   of sintered nano-Ag microstructure was performed
            microstructure characteristics and thermal conductivity   accordingly. Based on the SEM image characteristics of
            of sintered nano-Ag. The 95% confidence region also   actual sintered nano-Ag microstructure, 186 images of
            confirms that the proposed optimal ANN model has good   the microstructure, obtained from using 3-pixel sizes
            predictive performance. The confidence interval represents   and different sintering times, were reconstructed using
            the knowledge level of the best fitting line and determines   the Gaussian random model. The thermal conductivity
            that the true linear fitting output is within the interval. In   in the x- and y-directions of the microstructure plane
            Figure 12, when the trained ANN model was used to predict   model was obtained by finite element simulation.
            thermal conductivity, the confidence interval between the   (ii). Given the advantages and disadvantages of both the
            predicted output and the real output was compared; it was   numerical parameters and the image input types for
            found that most of the predicted points overlapped with   neural network analysis, the numerical dataset and
            the actual value, with smaller differences corresponding to   the image dataset are established, respectively. An
            higher prediction accuracy.                           image was obtained from the reconstructed model of
              The factors that affect the thermal properties of sintered   the sintered nano-Ag microstructure, and the dataset
            nano-Ag, such as sintering process parameters, affect the   was enhanced four times. The model accuracy can be
            microstructure of sintered Ag nanoparticles. However, in   further improved by enhancing the amount of data
            existing studies, microstructure parameters are rarely used   used for model training.
            in thermal conductivity models.  Notably, our study utilized   (iii). Based  on  the  Bayesian  optimized  ANN  model,  the
                                     30
            the microscopic reconstruction method, which combines   average particle size, circumference, and porosity were
            Gaussian random reconstruction and finite element,    taken as input parameters to predict the equivalent
            effectively studying the thermal conductivity changes as   thermal conductivity of sintered nano-Ag. The final
            the microstructure changes under the influence of sintering   determination coefficient of the ANN model for the
            parameters. However, due to limitations in the dataset and   equivalent thermal conductivity prediction is 0.96.
            the difficulty of obtaining it, we only analyzed the evolution   The results are of great significance for evaluating the
            of microscopic grains at different sintering times using the   microstructure and physical properties of sintered
            open operation method, without considering the effect   nano-Ag. Hence, future studies should focus on the
            of sintering temperature. Nevertheless, if the influence of   physical mechanisms based on existing models.
            sintering temperature changes on thermal conductivity
            is included,  the model would  remain valid. Rong  et al.    Acknowledgments
                                                         29
            mentioned in their study that features selected from a   The authors would like to express their gratitude for the
            large descriptor space may limit the predictive accuracy   support from the National Natural Science Foundation
            of machine learning models. It is worth noting that we   of China (No.  12272012) and acknowledge the AI tool
            simultaneously used both the image dataset and the feature   SparkDesk (iFLYTEK) for enhancing the language quality
            parameter dataset for training,  effectively mitigating  this   and readability of the manuscript.
            issue and enhancing the model’s generalization ability for
            different types of structures. We are working to integrate   Funding
            the aforementioned factors to study the microstructure
            evolution  of sintered nano-Ag,  aiming  to obtain  a more   This research was financially supported by the National
            comprehensive dataset that captures the changes in thermal   Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12272012).
            characteristics with respect to microstructure parameters.  Conflict of interest
            4. Conclusion                                      The authors declare that they have no known competing

            We presented the image of sintered nano-Ag microstructure   financial interests or personal relationships that could have
            based on Gaussian reconstruction, where feature parameters   appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
            and image data are separately extracted to form a dataset.   Author contributions
            The equivalent thermal conductivity of sintered nano-Ag
            is then predicted using a machine-learning model. In   Conceptualization: Jiahui Wei, Yanwei Dai
            summary, our key findings are as follows:          Formal analysis: Libo Zhao, Jiahui Wei


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         17                             doi: 10.36922/ijamd.5744
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28