Page 285 - IJB-10-1
P. 285

International Journal of Bioprinting                       Scaffolds manufacturing by fused deposition modeling




            was manually premixed in zippered bags at nHA contents   Table 2. Printing parameters for the tensile test specimens and
            of 0.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 wt%. The premixture consisted   the scaffolds
            of 800 g of material, which were passed through a twin-  Printing process parameter  Tensile test specimens  Scaffolds
            screw extruder (Dupra  S.L., Castalla, Spain) with an
            average residence time of 2 min. The extruder is equipped   Printing temperature (°C)  170  170
            with four individual heating zones and two screws with a   Bed temperature (°C)  65      65
            diameter of 25 mm and a length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio   Printing speed (mm/s)  30       30
            of 24. All extrusions were performed with a screw speed   Layer height (mm)  0.2         0.2
            ranging from 20 to 25 rpm with a temperature profile of   Infill (%)    100              70
            140/145/150/155°C. This extruder was employed in order   Raster angle (°)  0; 0/90 and 45/−45  0/90
            to obtain a proper filler dispersion in the polymer matrix,   Printing orientation  Flat  Flat
            as the second extruder employed is a single-screw extruder
            designed for filament fabrication only.
                                                               designed using FreeCAD software. To achieve the desired
               The extruded materials were pelletized in an air-  porosity, the gcode was set with a linear infill patter with the
            knife unit and stored in hermetic plastic bags to prevent   lines  oriented  at  0°/90°  (with  no  walls  and  no  top/bottom
            moisture uptake. The resulting samples were labeled as   layers) and a 70% infill density. The infill density was chosen
            P(3HB-co-3HHx)/HA content. For instance, the sample   in order to get connected pores but with a low porosity values
            containing 5.0 wt% of nHA was codified as P(3HB-co-  so that the mechanical properties were not greatly reduced. 52
            3HHx)/5HA, while the neat matrix (0.0 wt% nHA) was
            named as P(3HB-co-3HHx).                              On the one hand, tensile tests were used to characterize
                                                               the mechanical properties of the proposed formulations
            2.3. Filament extrusion and 3D printing parameters  obtained by means of additive manufacturing. For this
            Once the nanocomposites were prepared and pelletized, a   reason, an infill density of 100% was employed. Only the
            single-screw extruder equipped with four heating zones,   infill pattern was changed since it is the most relevant
            Next 1.0 model from 3devo (Utrecht, The Netherlands),   parameter in terms of mechanical properties in additive
            was used to obtain the 3D printing filaments with the   manufacturing.  Other printing parameters like the layer
                                                                           53
            proper dimensions. The temperature profile from the inlet   height were set to improve the final properties according
            hopper to the nozzle was 150/155/160/150°C, with an   to the information obtained in literature.  On the other
                                                                                                 54
            extrusion speed of 5 rpm. The extruder uses a feedback   hand, scaffolds were used to assess their degradation in
            cascade controller to adjust the rotational speed of the   a phosphate-buffered solution by means of immersion.
            spool to target the desired filament diameter. The diameter   Compression tests were also carried out with the scaffolds
            was set at 2.85 mm, obtaining average diameters of 2.85 ±    at a different immersion time.
            0.03, 2.85 ± 0.05, 2.85 ± 0.04, and 2.84 ± 0.10 mm, for the
            nanocomposites containing 0.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 wt%    2.4. Physical and mechanical characterization of
            of nHA, respectively. Changes in the diameters and   nanocomposites
            deviation obtained for each material led to the differences   For the tensile test, 3D-printed standardized tensile
            in rheological behavior with the addition of the nHA. But   test samples were employed following the ISO 527.
            in  any cases, the filaments  obtained could be perfectly   For the scaffold characterization, a compression test
            employed for the manufacturing process.            was  performed  following  the  ISO  604.  To  this  effect,  a
                                                               universal testing machine (under tensile or compression
               3D printing was carried out using an Ultimaker 3   mode) ELIB 30 from S.A.E. Ibertest (Madrid, Spain) was
            (Utrecht, The Netherlands) equipped with a 0.8-mm   employed. In both cases, the machine was equipped with
            nozzle.  For  the  present  work,  two  geometries  were   a 5-kN load cell and a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min was
            considered: tensile test specimens (Figure 1a), according to   selected according to the testing speeds proposed in the
            ISO 527, and scaffolds of 12 × 12 × 25 mm  (Figure 1b). The   standard. Regarding the tensile test, three specimens of
                                             3
            printing parameters are given in Table 2. Figure 1 shows   each material were tested for the raster angle proposed.
            the geometry and raster angle of the printed materials,   In contrast, three scaffolds were tested each week for the
            both for tensile test specimens (Figure 1a) and scaffolds   material considered; therefore, 15 scaffolds were printed
            (Figure 1b).
                                                               for each material. For the result analysis, on the one hand,
               Three replicates were printed for each raster angle   the data recorded during tensile test were the maximum
            condition  in  the  case  of  tensile  test  specimens,  while  15   tensile strength measured during the test (tensile strength),
            scaffolds were printed. For the scaffold manufacture, a cube   the maximum elongation of the sample achieved during
            with the mentioned external dimensions of the device was   the test (elongation at break), and the tensile modulus


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       277                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0156
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290