Page 504 - IJB-10-1
P. 504

International Journal of Bioprinting                          Macro and micro structure of a 3D-printed implant




            Table 2. Result of FE mesh convergence test
             Element size of bone   Element size of implant   Total number of   Maximum of model total   Maximum value of 1st principal
             (mm)               (mm)               elements        deformation  (mm)   stress (MPa)
             3.5                2.5                53,381          0.466370346         43.09854468
             2.8                2.0                83,842          0.462659744         54.06405693
             1.8                1.4                254,998         0.454711458         60.30253952
             1.2                0.8                846,132         0.451476180         55.76232215
             1                  0.5                1,621,794       0.448825515         56.67746388
             Error % (between 1.2 mm   Error % (between 0.8 mm     <2%                 <2%
             and 1 mm)          and 0.5 mm)




































            Figure 2. Finite element high tibial osteotomy mesh patterns using wedge system, including solid wedge and optimized wedge in left part and using plate
            system in right part.

            achieve a lightweight design while maintaining the   pore sizes ranging from 500 to 800 μm (average 700 μm),
            optimal solid WS structure distribution. The topology   based on relevant literature. 6,26  This approach led to the
            optimization outcomes, indicating regions suitable for   development of a novel bone-filled WS with a biomimetic
            material removal, were then utilized in the CAD software   microstructure, as depicted in Figure 4a.
            SpaceClaim to reconstruct the bone-filled WS structure
            (Figure 3b and c). Based on the topology optimization   2.3. Finite element analysis
            results, the posterior region was identified as the area for   The T plate and screws were assembled and fixed onto
            bone filling using biomimetic lattices. The YM lattice with   the previous osteotomy tibia model in the CAD software
            unit cell size 2.6 mm, known for its widespread use and   according to clinical requirements to understand the
            suitability for bone growth, was selected as the unit cell   mechanical effects from using a WS with embedded screws
            and  integrated  into  the  design  using  3-Matics  software   compared to a traditional T plate fixation in HTO. Four
            (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). The lattice design   screws were fixed above the osteotomy surface, while five
            parameters were tailored to promote bone ingrowth,   screws were fixed onto the bone shaft below the osteotomy
            with a porosity range of 65%–75% (average 70%) and   surface  (Figure  4d). The  model was then  input into  FE


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       496                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1584
   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509