Page 55 - IJB-2-1
P. 55

Elizabeth  V. Koudan,  Elena A. Bulanova, Frederico  DAS Pereira,  et al

                                                               sian Research Fund (project number 15-15-00173).

                                                               References

                                                               1.   Derby  B, 2012, Printing and  prototyping of tissues and
                                                                   scaffolds. Science, vol.338(6109): 921–926.
                                                                   http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1226340
                                                               2.   Murphy S V and Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues
                                                                   and organs. Nature Biotechnology, vol.32(8): 773–785.
                                                                   http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
                                                               3.   Atala A and Yoo J J, 2015, Essentials of 3D Biofabrica-
                                                                   tion and Translation, Academic Press, United States.
                                                               4.   Chua C K and Yeong W Y, 2015, Bioprinting: Principles
                                                                   and Applications, World Scientific Publishing Company,

            Figure 12. Tissue constructs formed by attachment of patterned   Singapore.
            tissue spheroids to electrospun polyurethane matrix as a tech-  5.   Gao G and Cui X, 2015, Three-dimensional bioprinting in
            nology platform for 3D bioprinting: (A) Patterned tissue sphe-  tissue engineering and  regenerative medicine. Biotech-
            roids attached  to electrospun  polyurethane matrix;  (B)  Biofa-  nology Letters, vol.37(12): 1–9.
            brication  of acellular collagen  patches;  (C)  Biofabrication of   http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1975-1
            human skin; (D) Biofabrication of cartilage.       6.   Ozbolat IT, 2015, Bioprinting  scale-up tissue and organ
                                                                   constructs for transplantation.  Trends in  Biotechnology,
            and tissue spheroids from keratinocytes on another     vol.33(7): 395–400.
            side of matrix will enable biofabrication of human skin   http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.005
            (Figure 12C). Using several layers of chondrospheres   7.   Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Drake  C,  et al.,  2008, Organ
            attached to electrospun polyurethane matrix will also   printing:  Promises and challenges.  Regenerative Medi-
            allow to biofabricate human cartilage (Figure 12D).    cine, vol.3(1): 93–103.
               Finally, using  magnetically functionalized  electro-  http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/17460751.3.1.93
            spun matrices with magnetic nanoparticles [23]  as well   8.   Mironov V, Visconti R P, Kasyanov V, et al., 2009, Organ
            as using tissue spheroids biofabricated from cells labe-  printing: Tissue  spheroids as  building blocks.  Biomate-
            lled with magnetic nanoparticles [24–27]  will enable the   rials, vol.30(12): 2164–2174.
            development of novel  magnetic 3D bioprinting tech-    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.084
            nology  based on  principles of magnetic levitation  or   9.   Perez-Pomares  J  M  and Foty  R  A, 2006,  Tissue  fusion
            translocation of tissue constructs using magnetic for-  and  cell sorting in embryonic development and disease:
            ces [28–30] .                                          Biomedical implications. BioEssays, vol.28(8): 809–821.
                                                                   http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20442
            5. Conclusion                                      10.  Hajdu  Z,  Mironov V, Mehesz A  N,  et al., 2010, Tissue
                                                                   spheroid fusion-based in vitro screening assays for analy-
            Tissue spheroids biofabricated from human fibroblasts   sis of tissue maturation.  Journal of Tissue Engineering
            have been placed in regular patterns on the surface of   and Regenerative Medicine, vol.4(8): 659–664.
            electrospun polyurethane  matrix using 3D bioprinter.   http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.291
            Spreading of patterned tissue spheroids demonstrated   11.  Huang G S, Tseng C S, Linju Yen B, et al., 2013, Solid
            an  in  vitro  biocompatibiity of  electrospun  microfibr-  freeform-fabricated scaffolds designed to carry multicel-
            ous polyurethane. The biocompatible electrospun poly-  lular mesenchymal stem cell spheroids for cartilage re-
            urethane matrix could serve as a carrier for tissue sph-  generation.  European Cells and Materials, vol.26: 179–
            eroids. Thus, tissue spheroids spread on microfibrous   194; discussion 194.
            electrospun polyurethane  matrix is a novel technolo-  12.  Ozbolat  IT  and Yu Y, 2013, Bioprinting  toward organ
            gical  platform  for  advancing  biofabrication  and  3D   fabrication: Challenges and future trends. IEEE Transac-
            bioprinting.                                           tions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.60(3): 691–699.
                                                                   http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912
            Conflict of Interest and Funding                   13.  Schon B S, Schrobback K, van der Ven M, et al., 2012,
                                                                   Validation  of a high-throughput microtissue fabrication
            No conflict of interest was reported by  the  authors.   process for 3D assembly  of tissue engineered  cartilage
            This research has been supported by grant from Rus-    constructs. Cell and Tissue Research, vol.347(3): 629–642.

                                        International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 1      51
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60