Page 86 - IJB-2-1
P. 86

Electrospun 3D multi-scale fibrous scaffold for enhanced human dermal fibroblasts infiltration

                                                    [7]
            for skin tissue regeneration and wound healing . Sca-  µm below scaffold surface using rat insulinoma cell
            ffold fabrication techniques, e.g., electrospinning, self-   line INS-1. This research demonstrated the feasibility
            assembling peptides and phase separation, have been   to produce porous nanofibrous 3D scaffold using elec-
            outlined as the three promising  methods to create   trospinning  with  customized  collector.  Even  though
            scaffold of fiber sizes close to the ECM fibrils in na-  the response of human cells was not investigated in
                   [8]
            noscale . Among them, electrospinning offers  supe-  the FLUF mesh, this study has proven the concept of
            rior versatility  capable of fabricating nanofibrous   changing collection method in a way of changing the
            scaffold of high porosity at controllable structure, low   electrical field to collect electrospinning fibers in 3D.
            cost, and high repeatability from a wide range of po-  However, such a collector must be tailor-made to in-
            lymers. Furthermore, the use of electrospinning allows   dividual electrospinning setup due to the difference in
            tailoring of scaffold’s properties according to targeted   the dimension and environment which may interfere
            tissue. The large surface to volume ratio of the nano-  with the electrical field. Practically this system is dif-
            fiber scaffold  also  promotes cell adhesion  and  cell   ficult to be implemented to different kinds of conven-
            migration.                                         tional setup  as there are too  many parameters which
               Conventional electrospinning collects nanofibers on   may affect the fiber formation. These parameters in-
            a plate collector where nanofibers are formed and col-  clude the diameter, thickness and  material  of the
            lected as a 2D mat. This results in densely packed na-  spherical dish, position, number, length and diameter
            nofibers with reduced pore size and porosity and it is   of the needles.
            challenging to build a scaffold with thickness beyond   In this work, we aim to fabricate 3D poly-ε-cap-
                                              [9]
            100 µm using this conventional method . The limited   rolactone (PCL) scaffold with multi-scale fibers via an
            cell  infiltration due  to  the  densely packed structure   improved electrospinning process based on the con-
            and small pore size has restricted the  application of   ventional  setup.  The  method  is  easy  to  set  up  and
            electrospun scaffold [10] . Numerous approaches have be-  can be adapted by  any conventional  electrospinning
            en reported to increase the pore size of the traditional   setup. The scaffold fabricated was then surface mod-
            electrospun  scaffold [11,12] , including  mechanical  ex-  ified to improve the hyrophilicity of the PCL material
            pansion [13] , inclusion of porogen [14] , increment of the   for better cell adhesion and penetration. Human der-
            fiber diameter [15] , incorporation of sacrificial fibers [16,17] ,   mal fibroblasts (HDFs) were used to check the effec-
            cryogenic electropinning [18] , and addition of microscale   tiveness of the 3D multi-scale scaffold for cell infiltra-
            (3~10 µm) [19,20]  or macroscale (~300 µm) [21,22]  fibers   tion and ECM protein deposition. This strategy pro-
            into the nanoscale fiber (~600 nm) scaffold. However,   vides a cost-effective and feasible solution for over-
            the fabricated scaffold’s thickness is still limited and   coming the current challenges based on conventional
            cellular infiltration was either not studied or limited to   electrospinning to produce 3D instead of 2D scaffold
            the surface of the scaffold.                       and has great potential across a wide range of tissue
               A thicker scaffold, with versatility to be optimized   engineering applications [26] .
            to the dimension of wound size,  may be helpful for
            treatment of deep skin injury where greater structural   2. Materials and Methods
            support is required to enhance wound healing. To   2.1 Materials
            overcome this inherent limitation associated with tra-
            ditional electrospinning technique, several variants of   Poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) (Mn 80,000) granules, Type
            electrospinning have been devised [23,24] . In recent stu-  A gelatin derived from porcine skin, 25% glutaralde-
            dies, collector  design  has been  changed from tradi-  hyde, and  ethylenediamine (Fluka)  were purchased
            tional flat surface to protruded shape to increase pore   from Sigma Aldrich. Organic solvent dichloromethane
            size in  electrospun  scaffold [23,25] . For example, fabri-  (DCM) was purchased  from TEDIA, USA. N,N-Di-
            cation of cotton ball-like 3D scaffold  called  FLUF   methylformamide (DMF) was purchased from Merck,
            (Focused, Low density, and Uncompressed nanoFibr-  USA. HDFs were purchased from Life Technologies,
            ous) mesh used an array of point collectors embedded   USA.  Phosphate buffer saline (PBS), low glucose
            in a spherical dish [23] . The pore size of the FLUF mesh   Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high
            was increased from typical <1 µm to between 2 µm to   glucose DMEM, gold fetal bovine serum  (FBS),
            5 µm as viewed under scanning electron microscopy   L-glutamine and 1% penicillin-streptomycin  were
            (SEM). The cell infiltration was demonstrated at ~300   purchased from PAA Laboratories, Pasching, Austria.

            82                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 1
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91