Page 87 - IJB-2-1
P. 87

Wen Shing Leong, Shu Cheng Wu, Kee Woei Ng, et al.

            Minisart  High  Flow  0.2  µm syringe  filter  unit  was   FTA 200 (First Ten Angstroms, USA) via the sessile
            purchased from  Sartorius Stedim Biotech S.A.,  Au-  drop  method with 0.5  μL  of  DI  dispensed  from the
            bagne, France. Jung tissue freezing medium was pur-  syringe of the system.
            chased from Leica Instruments, Germany.
                                                               2.5 Mechanical Testing
            2.2 Fabrication of Electrospun Scaffold
                                                               The mechanical properties of 2D electrospun scaffolds
            Electrospun  scaffolds were fabricated  using  electros-  were investigated using Instron microtester 5848. The
            pinning chamber, Nanon-01A (Mecc Co. Ltd, Japan).   samples were die cut into dumbbell shapes according
            Briefly,  PCL  was dissolved in DCM  and  DMF at   to ASTM D638. The sample was tested under  a
            3.5:6.5 (v/v) ratio to obtain 13% (w/v) solution. The   crosshead speed of 10 mm/min at room temperature.
            polymer solution was spun through 21G metal nozzle   5 surface modified scaffolds and 5 surface non-mod-
            at accelerating voltage 18kV and flow rate 0.5 mL/h.   ified scaffolds were tested to investigate the effect of
            Working distance was set at 15 cm for 2D scaffold   surface modification on the mechanical properties of
            collected on collector plate, and 7.5 cm for 3D scaf-  the scaffolds.
            fold collected on a 7.5 cm stainless steel medical hy-
            podermic 18G needle  insulated from ground. Elec-  2.6 SEM Characterization and Fiber Diameter
            trospinning was carried out for 4 hours for collection   Measurements
            of 2D scaffold and  30  minutes for collection of 3D   The electrospun  PCL scaffolds were sputter coated
            scaffold. Collected electrospun scaffolds were dried in   with gold for 30 seconds at 18mA. The size and mor-
            vacuum oven at 37°C for 1 week to remove any resi-  phology of scaffolds were observed using SEM (JEOL
            dual solvent.                                      JSM-5310).  Fiber diameters were measured  using

            2.3 Surface Modification                           ImageJ [28]  from triplicates. At least 50 measurements
                                                               were taken at random locations in SEM micrograph.
            Gelatin was grafted onto the electrospun fiber surface
            through aminolysis [27] . Briefly, scaffolds were washed   2.7 Porosity and Pore Size Measurements
            in 70% ethanol and deionized (DI) water, followed by   Micrometritics Autopore IV 9500 Mercury Porosime-
            immersion in 40%(v/v)  ethylenediamine at room     ter was used to investigate pore size and porosimetry
            temperature for 14 hours. Scaffolds were then rinsed 3   of non-modified 3D and 2D electrospun scaffold. The
            times with DI water for 10 minutes to  remove free   range of pore diameters, d p, could be calculated using
            ethylenediamine. After that, scaffolds were immersed   the Washburn equation (Equation (1)).
            in 2.5% (by weight) glutaraldehyde (GA) for 4 hours
                                                                                      γ −
            at  room  temperature,  followed  by  washing  3  times            d =   4 cosθ               (1)
                                                                                p
            with DI water for 10  minutes. GA grafted scaffolds                        P
            were  then incubated in  3  mg/mL  filtered  gelatin  at   where  γ  is the  surface tension  of mercury,  θ  is the
            37°C for 24 hours. Gelatin immobilized scaffolds   contact angle between  the  mercury and the  scaffold
            were then rinsed 3 times with DI water for 10 minutes   and P is the pressure. As reported in literature [29] , a
            to  remove free  gelatin.  Lastly, prior to  cell culture,   contact angle of 140° between PCL and mercury in air
            scaffolds were sterilized under ultraviolet light for 10   was used. Four replicates were  measured  for each
            minutes.                                           scaffold type.
               All chemical treatment and  washing  processes in-
            volving the use  of solution were carried out within   2.8 Cell Seeding
            vacuum chamber to ensure complete perfusion of the   HDFs were cultured in fibroblasts cell basal medium
            solution. Prior to  subsequent characterization, all   (high glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% Gold
            scaffolds were freeze-dried to ensure the volume and   FBS,  1%  penicillin  streptomycin,  1%  Amphotericin
            shape of the scaffolds remained intact, and no mois-  B). To prepare scaffolds for cell culture, 3D scaffolds
            ture was trapped within the scaffolds.             were cut into 0.6×0.6×0.6 cm   cube while 2D scaf-
                                                                                         3
                                                                                              3
            2.4 Contact Angle Measurement                      folds were cut into 1.6×1.7×0.08 cm  sheet. The cells
                                                                                                     3
                                                               were seeded  at same density (500  cells/mm ) on 2D
            Static water contact angle measurements on 2D elec-  and  3D scaffolds. Cell culture  media were changed
            trospun scaffold  membranes were carried out using   every two days.
                                        International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 1      83
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92