Page 568 - IJB-10-2
P. 568

International Journal of Bioprinting                              OLS design for distal femur osseointegration




            7.   Revie IC, Wallace ME, Orr JF. The effect of PMMA thickness   19.  Al-Tamimi AA, Almeida H, Bartolo P. Structural
               on thermal bone necrosis around acetabular sockets. Proc   optimization for medical implants through additive
               Inst Mech Eng H. 1994;208(1):45-51.                manufacturing. Prog Addit Manuf. 2020;5(2):95-110.
               doi: 10.1177/095441199420800106                    doi: 10.1007/s40964-020-00109-7
            8.   Hasandoost L, Rodriguez O, Alhalawani A, et al. The role   20.  Burton HE, Eisenstein NM, Lawless BM, et al. The design of
               of poly(methyl methacrylate) in management of bone loss   additively manufactured lattices to increase the functionality
               and infection in revision total knee arthroplasty: a review.    of  medical  implants.  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl.
               J Funct Biomater. 2020;11(2):25.                   2019;94:901-908.
               doi: 10.3390/jfb11020025                           doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.052
            9.   Mnaymneh W, Malinin TI, Lackman RD, Hornicek   21.  Wang P, Li X, Luo S, Nai MLS, Ding J, Wei J. Additively
               FJ, Ghandur-Mnaymneh L. Massive distal femoral     manufactured heterogeneously  porous  metallic  bone
               osteoarticular allografts after resection of bone tumors. Clin   with biostructural functions and bone-like mechanical
               Orthop Relat Res. 1994;303:103-115.                properties. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;62:173-179.
               doi: 10.1097/00003086-199406000-00013              doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.056
            10.  Kim T, See CW, Li X, Zhu D. Orthopedic implants and   22.  Bucklen BS, Wettergreen WA, Yuksel E, Liebschner MAK.
               devices for bone fractures and defects: past, present and   Bone-derived CAD library for assembly of scaffolds in
               perspective. Eng Regen. 2020;1:6-18.               computer-aided tissue engineering.  Virtual Phys Prototyp.
               doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003                  2008;3(1):13-23.
                                                                  doi: 10.1080/17452750801911352
            11.  Song Y, Xu DS, Yang R, Li D, Wu WT, Guo ZX. Theoretical
               study of the effects of alloying elements on the strength and   23.  Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, et al. The effect of pore
               modulus of β-type bio-titanium alloys.  Mater Sci Eng A.   geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human
               1999;260(1):269-274.                               periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted
               doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00886-7                 Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds.  Acta Biomater. 2012;8(7):2824-
                                                                  2834.
            12.   Velasco MA, Narváez-Tovar CA, Garzón-Alvarado DA.
               Design, materials, and mechanobiology of biodegradable      doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001
               scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.  Biomed Res Int.   24.  Guoqing Z, Junxin L, Chengguang Z, Juanjuan X, Xiaoyu Z,
               2015;2015:729076.                                  Anmin W. Design optimization and manufacturing of bio-
               doi: 10.1155/2015/729076                           fixed tibial implants using 3D printing technology. J Mech
                                                                  Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;117:104415.
            13.  Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK. Ti based
               biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants      doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104415
               – a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54(3):397-425.  25.  Mishra RN, Singh MK, Kumar V. Biomechanical analysis of
               doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004                 human femur using finite element method: a review study.
                                                                  Mater Today: Proc. 2022;56(1):384-389.
            14.  Liu Y, Li K, Wu H, et  al. Synthesis of  Ti-Ta alloys with
               dual structure by incomplete diffusion between elemental      doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.222
               powders. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;51:302-312.  26.  Alabort E, Barba D, Reed RC. Design of metallic bone by
               doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.004                   additive manufacturing. Scr Mater. 2019;164:110-114.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01.022
            15.  Arabnejad S, Burnett Johnston R, Pura JA, Singh B, Tanzer
               M, Pasini  D. High-strength porous biomaterials for  bone   27.  Lozanovski B, Leary M, Tran P, et al. Computational
               replacement: a strategy to assess the interplay between cell   modelling of strut defects in SLM manufactured lattice
               morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and   structures. Mater Des. 2019;171:107671.
               manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomater. 2016;30:345-356.     doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107671
               doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048
                                                               28.  Ejnisman L, Gobbato B, de França Camargo AF, Zancul
            16.  Hsieh MT, Begley MR, Valdevit L. Architected implant   E. Three-dimensional printing in orthopedics: from the
               designs for long bones: advantages of minimal surface-based   basics to surgical applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med.
               topologies. Mater Des. 2021;207:109838.            2021;14(1):1-8.
               doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109838                  doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09691-3
            17.  Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Suzuki Y, Kawase T, Saito S. Distinct   29.  Wang YT, Hsu CK. Novel parameter optimization lattice
               responses of different populations of bone cells to mechanical   design for improving osseointegration in hypo-loading
               stress. Endocrinology. 1996;137(5):2028-2035.      regions  –  a  case  study  of  maxillary  tumor  reconstruction
               doi: 10.1210/endo.137.5.8612544                    implant. Mater Des. 2023;233(2023):112274.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112274
            18.  Ehrlich PJ, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain and bone cell
               function: a review. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(9):688-700.  30.  Lee KS, Lee WC, Kim PG, et al. Biomechanical evaluation
               doi: 10.1007/s001980200095                         of initial stability of  a root analogue implant  design  with

            Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024)                       560                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2590
   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572