Page 568 - IJB-10-2
P. 568
International Journal of Bioprinting OLS design for distal femur osseointegration
7. Revie IC, Wallace ME, Orr JF. The effect of PMMA thickness 19. Al-Tamimi AA, Almeida H, Bartolo P. Structural
on thermal bone necrosis around acetabular sockets. Proc optimization for medical implants through additive
Inst Mech Eng H. 1994;208(1):45-51. manufacturing. Prog Addit Manuf. 2020;5(2):95-110.
doi: 10.1177/095441199420800106 doi: 10.1007/s40964-020-00109-7
8. Hasandoost L, Rodriguez O, Alhalawani A, et al. The role 20. Burton HE, Eisenstein NM, Lawless BM, et al. The design of
of poly(methyl methacrylate) in management of bone loss additively manufactured lattices to increase the functionality
and infection in revision total knee arthroplasty: a review. of medical implants. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl.
J Funct Biomater. 2020;11(2):25. 2019;94:901-908.
doi: 10.3390/jfb11020025 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.052
9. Mnaymneh W, Malinin TI, Lackman RD, Hornicek 21. Wang P, Li X, Luo S, Nai MLS, Ding J, Wei J. Additively
FJ, Ghandur-Mnaymneh L. Massive distal femoral manufactured heterogeneously porous metallic bone
osteoarticular allografts after resection of bone tumors. Clin with biostructural functions and bone-like mechanical
Orthop Relat Res. 1994;303:103-115. properties. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;62:173-179.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199406000-00013 doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.056
10. Kim T, See CW, Li X, Zhu D. Orthopedic implants and 22. Bucklen BS, Wettergreen WA, Yuksel E, Liebschner MAK.
devices for bone fractures and defects: past, present and Bone-derived CAD library for assembly of scaffolds in
perspective. Eng Regen. 2020;1:6-18. computer-aided tissue engineering. Virtual Phys Prototyp.
doi: 10.1016/j.engreg.2020.05.003 2008;3(1):13-23.
doi: 10.1080/17452750801911352
11. Song Y, Xu DS, Yang R, Li D, Wu WT, Guo ZX. Theoretical
study of the effects of alloying elements on the strength and 23. Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, et al. The effect of pore
modulus of β-type bio-titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human
1999;260(1):269-274. periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted
doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00886-7 Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(7):2824-
2834.
12. Velasco MA, Narváez-Tovar CA, Garzón-Alvarado DA.
Design, materials, and mechanobiology of biodegradable doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001
scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int. 24. Guoqing Z, Junxin L, Chengguang Z, Juanjuan X, Xiaoyu Z,
2015;2015:729076. Anmin W. Design optimization and manufacturing of bio-
doi: 10.1155/2015/729076 fixed tibial implants using 3D printing technology. J Mech
Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;117:104415.
13. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, Gogia AK. Ti based
biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104415
– a review. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;54(3):397-425. 25. Mishra RN, Singh MK, Kumar V. Biomechanical analysis of
doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 human femur using finite element method: a review study.
Mater Today: Proc. 2022;56(1):384-389.
14. Liu Y, Li K, Wu H, et al. Synthesis of Ti-Ta alloys with
dual structure by incomplete diffusion between elemental doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.222
powders. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;51:302-312. 26. Alabort E, Barba D, Reed RC. Design of metallic bone by
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.004 additive manufacturing. Scr Mater. 2019;164:110-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01.022
15. Arabnejad S, Burnett Johnston R, Pura JA, Singh B, Tanzer
M, Pasini D. High-strength porous biomaterials for bone 27. Lozanovski B, Leary M, Tran P, et al. Computational
replacement: a strategy to assess the interplay between cell modelling of strut defects in SLM manufactured lattice
morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and structures. Mater Des. 2019;171:107671.
manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomater. 2016;30:345-356. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107671
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048
28. Ejnisman L, Gobbato B, de França Camargo AF, Zancul
16. Hsieh MT, Begley MR, Valdevit L. Architected implant E. Three-dimensional printing in orthopedics: from the
designs for long bones: advantages of minimal surface-based basics to surgical applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med.
topologies. Mater Des. 2021;207:109838. 2021;14(1):1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109838 doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09691-3
17. Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Suzuki Y, Kawase T, Saito S. Distinct 29. Wang YT, Hsu CK. Novel parameter optimization lattice
responses of different populations of bone cells to mechanical design for improving osseointegration in hypo-loading
stress. Endocrinology. 1996;137(5):2028-2035. regions – a case study of maxillary tumor reconstruction
doi: 10.1210/endo.137.5.8612544 implant. Mater Des. 2023;233(2023):112274.
doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112274
18. Ehrlich PJ, Lanyon LE. Mechanical strain and bone cell
function: a review. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(9):688-700. 30. Lee KS, Lee WC, Kim PG, et al. Biomechanical evaluation
doi: 10.1007/s001980200095 of initial stability of a root analogue implant design with
Volume 10 Issue 2 (2024) 560 doi: 10.36922/ijb.2590

