Page 44 - IJB-3-1

Recent cell printing systems for tissue engineering

ing method and its application to hepatogenic differentia- cation, vol.8(3): 035021.
tion of hum an adipose stem cell-embedded mesh struc- https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035021
tures, Science Reports-UK, vol.5:13427 57. Mota C, Puppi D, Chiellini F, et al. 2015, Additive man-
47. You F, Wu X, Chen X, 2016, 3D Printing of Sorous Dl- ufacturing techniques for the production of tissue engi-
ginate/gelatin Kydrogel Vcaffolds and Wheir Pechanical neering constructs, Journal of Tissue Engineering and
Sroperty Fharacterization, International Journal of Po- Regenerative Medicine, vol.9(3): 174±190.
lymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, In-Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1635
48. Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, et al. 2014, Printing three-dimen- 58. Lutolf MP, Gilbert PM, Blau HM, 2009, Designing mate-
sional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular rials to direct stem-cell fate, Nature, vol.462(7272):
matrix bioink, Nature Communications, vol.5: 3935. 433±441.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4935 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08602
49. Yoon H, Lee JS, Yim H, et al. 2016, Development of 59. Chung JH, Naficy S, Yue Z, et al. 2013, Bio-ink proper-
cell-laden 3D scaffolds for efficient engineered skin ties and printability for extrusion printing living cells,
substitutes by collagen gelation, RSC Advances, vol.6(26): Biomaterials Science, vol.1(7): 763±773.
21439±21447. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3bm00012e
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA19532B 60. Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, et al. 2011, Di-
50. Ahn S, Lee H, Lee EJ, et al. 2014, A direct cell printing rect-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid sys-
supplemented with low-temperature processing method tems for fu ture regenerative therapies, Journal of Bio-
for obtaining highly porous three-dimensional cell-laden medical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials,
scaffolds. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol.2(18): vol.98B(1): 160±170.
± https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb00139g https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31831
51. Yeo M, Kim G, 2015, Fabrication of cell-laden electros- 61. Khalil S, Sun W, 2009, Bioprinting Hndothelial Fells
pun hybrid scaffolds of a lginate-based bioink and PCL Zith Dlginate for 3D Wissue Fonstructs, Journal of Biome-
microstructures for tissue regeneration, Chemical Engi- chanical Engineering, vol.131(11): 111002±111007.
neering Journal, vol.275: 27±35. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3128729
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.038 62. Cui XF, Breitenkamp K, Finn MG, et al. 2012, Direct
52. Yeo M, Ha J, Lee H, et al. 2016, Fabrication of Kuman Fartilage Uepair Xsing Whree-Gimensional EioSULQW-
hASCs-laden structures using extrusion-based cell print- ing Wechnology, Tissue Engineering Part A, YRO ±
ing supplemented with an electric field, Acta Biomateria- 1304±1312.
lia, vol.38: 33±43. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.017 63. Nair K, Gandhi M, Khalil S, et al. 2009, Characterization
53. Shim J-H, Lee J-S, Kim JY, et al. 2012, Bioprinting of a of cell viability during bioprinting processes, Biotech-
mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden nology Journal, vol.4(8): 1168±1177.
construct for os teochondral tissue engineering using a https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200900004
multi-head tissue/organ building system, Journal of Mi- 64. Xu T, Gregory CA, Molnar P, et al. 2006, Viability and
cromechanics and Microengineering, vol.22(8): 085014. electrophysiology of neural cell structures generated by
https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085014 the inkjet printing method, Biomaterials, vol.27(19):
54. Lee H, Ahn S, Bonassar LJ, et al. 2013, Cell 3580±3588.
(MC3T3‐E1)‐Printed Poly (ϵ‐caprolactone)/Alginate Hy- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.048
brid Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration, Macromolecular 65. Phillippi JA, Miller E, Weiss L, et al. 2008, Microenvi-
Rapid Communications, vol.34(2): 142±149. ronments Hngineered by Lnkjet Eioprinting Vpatially GiUHFW
https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201200524 Ddult Vtem Fells Woward PusclH DQG ERQH OLNH VXESRSX‐
55. Park JY, Shim JH, Choi SA, et al. 2015, 3D printing lations, Stem Cells, vol.26(1): 127±134.
technology to control BMP-2 and VEGF delivery spa- https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0520
tially and temporally to promote large-volume bone re- 66. Cohen DL, Lo W, Tsavaris A, et al. 2010, Increased
generation, Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol.3(27): Pixing Lmproves Kydrogel Komogeneity and Tuality of
5415±5425. Whree-Gimensional Srinted Fonstructs, Tissue Engineering
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB00637F Part C: Methods, vol.17(2): 239±248.
56. Yeo M, Lee H, Kim GH, 2016, Combining a mi- https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0093
cro/nano-hierarchical scaffold with cell printing of 67. Andersen T, Auk-Emblem P, Dornish M, 2015, 3D cell
myoblasts induces cell alignment and differentiation fa- culture in alginate hydrogels, Microarrays, vol.4(2):
vorable to skeletal muscle tissue regeneration, Biofabri- 133±161.

40 International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 1