Page 42 - IJB-3-1

Recent cell printing systems for tissue engineering

tially supported by a grant from the National Research 11. Guillotin B, Guillemot F, Cell patterning technologies for
Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Ministry of organotypic tissue fabrication, Trends in Biotechnology,
Education, Science, and Technology (MEST) (Grant vol.29(4): 183±190.
no. NRF- 2015R1A2A1A15055305) and also a grant https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.12.008
from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, 12. Seol YJ, Kang HW, Lee SJ, et al. 2014, Bioprinting
Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Re- technology and its applications, European Journal Car-
public of Korea (Grant no. HI15C3000). dio-Thoracic Surgery, vol.46(3): 342±348.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu148
References 13. Wilson WC, Boland T, 2003, Cell and Rrgan Srinting 1:
3rotein and Fell Srinters, The Anatomical Record Part A,
1. Whitaker M, 2014, The history of 3D printing in health- 272A: 491±496.
care, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of Eng- https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.a.10057
land Bulletin, vol.96: 228±229. 14. Dababneh AB, Ozbolat IT, 2014, Bioprinting technology:
https://doi.org/10.1308/147363514X13990346756481 $ current state-of-the-art review, Journal of Manufactur-
2. Griffith LG, Naughton G, 2002, Tissue engineering ± ing Science and Engineering, vol.136(6): 061016.
Current challenges and expanding opportunities, Science, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028512
vol.295(5557): 1009±1014. 15. Seol YJ, Kang HW, Lee SJ, et al. 2014, Bioprinting
https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1069210 technology and its applications, European Journal of
3. Hollister SJ, 2005, Porous scaffold design for tissue en- Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1±7, ezu148.
gineering, Nature Materials, vol.4(7): 518±524. 16. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1421
4. Whitford WG, 2016, Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A de- organs, Nature Biotechnology, vol.32(8): 773±785.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
velopment parameters review, Immunome Research, 17. Guillemot F, Guillotin B, Catros S, et al. 2010, High-
vol.12(S2): 24. throughput biological laser printing: droplet ejection me-
https://doi.org/10.4172/1745-7580.c1.004
5. Loo Y, Lakshmanan A, Ni M, et al. 2015, Peptide bioink: chanism, integration of a dedicated workstation, and bio-
printing of cells and biomaterials, Cell and Organ Print-
self-assembling nanofibrous scaffolds for t hree-Gimen-
sional organotypic cultures, Nano Letters, vol.15(10): ing, 95±113.
6919±6925. 18. Roda A, Guardigli M, Russo C, et al. 2000, Protein mi-
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02859 crodeposition using a conventional ink-jet printer, Bio-
6. Mironov V, Reis N, Derby B, 2006, Bioprinting: A Ee- techniques, vol.28(3): 492–496.
ginning, Tissue Engineering, vol.12: 4. 19. Barron J, Ringeisen B, Kim H, et al. 2004, Application of
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.631 laser printing to mammalian cells, Thin Solid Films,
7. Sun W, Lal P, 2002, Recent development on computer vol.453(383): 383–387.
aided tissue engineering ± a review, Computer Methods https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.161
and Programs in Biomedicine, vol.67(2): 85±103. 20. Hon K, Li L, Hutchings I, 2008, Direct writing technolo-
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(01)00116-X gy—advances and developments, CIRP Annals - Manu-
8. Sachlos E, Czernuszka JT, 2003, Making tissue engi- facturing Technology, vol.57(2): 601–620.
neering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid 21. Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, et al, 2010, Laser as-
freeform fabrication technology to the production of tis- sisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell den-
sue engineering scaffolds, European Cells & Materials, sity and microscale organization, Biomaterials,
vol.5: 29±39. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v005a03 vol.31(28): 7250–7256.
9. Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV, 2004, Scaf- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055
fold-based tissue engineering: rationale for comput- 22. Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S, 2013, The integration of
er-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems, nanotechnology and biology for cell engineering: prom-
Trends in Biotechnology, vol.22(7): 354±362. ises and challenges, Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005 vol.3(Godište 2013): 3±19.
10. Fedorovich NE, Schuurman W, Wijnberg HM, et al. 2012, 23. Xu T, Gregory A, Molnar P, et al. 2006, Viability and
Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by electrophysiology of n eural cell structures generated by
printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaf- the inkjet printing method, Biomaterials, vol.27(19):
folds, Tissue Engineering Part C: M ethods, vol.18(1): 3580–3588.
33±44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.048
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0060 24. Xu T, Jin J, Gregory C, et al. 2005, Inkjet printing of via-
38 International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 1