Page 30 - IJB-3-2

Bioprinting of osteochondral tissues: A perspective on current gaps and future trends

microtissue—Preliminary results. In Vivo, vol.26(2): 251–257. 54. Ozbolat I T, Peng W and Ozbolat V, 2016, Application areas
44. Makris E A, Gomoll A H, Malizos K N, et al., 2015, Repair of 3D bioprinting. Drug Discovery Today, vol.21: 1257–1271.
and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.04.006
Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol.11(1): 21–34. 55. Ozbolat I T, Moncal K K and Gudapati H, 2017, Evaluation
https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157. of bioprinter technologies. Additive Manufacturing, vol.13:
45. Schek R M, Taboas J M, Segvich S J, et al., 2004, Engineered 179–200.
osteochondral grafts using biphasic composite solid free-form https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.003
fabricated scaffolds. Tissue Engineering, vol.10: 1376–1385. 56. Ozbolat I T and Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances
https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2004.10.1376 and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting.
46. Zhang W, Lian Q, Li D, et al., 2014, Cartilage repair and Biomaterials, vol.76: 321–343.
subchondral bone migration using 3D printing osteochondral https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
composites: A one-year-period study in rabbit trochlea. 57. Gudapati H, Dey M and Ozbolat I T, 2016, A comprehensive
BioMed Research International, vol.2014: 746138. review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/746138 Biomaterials, vol.102: 20–42.
47. Cao T, Ho K-H and Teoh S-H, 2003, Scaffold design and in https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
vitro study of osteochondral coculture in a three-dimensional 58. Ozbolat I T, 2015, Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ
porous polycaprolactone scaffold fabricated by fused constructs for transplantation. Trends in Biotechnology,
deposition modeling. Tissue Engineering, vol.9(Suppl 1): vol.33: 395–400.
S103–S112. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.005
https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/10763270360697012 59. Dababneh A B and Ozbolat I T, 2014, Bioprinting technology:
48. Nowicki M A, Castro N J, Plesniak M W, et al., 2016, A current state-of-the-art review. Journal of Manufacturing
3D printing of novel osteochondral scaffolds with graded Science and Engineering, vol.136(6): 61016.
microstructure. Nanotechnology, vol.27: 414001. https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4028512
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/41/414001 60. Datta P, Ayan B and Ozbolat I T, 2017, Bioprinting for
49. Castro N J, Patel R and Zhang L G, 2015, Design of a novel vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Bio-
3D printed bioactive nanocomposite scaffold for improved materialia, vol.51: 1–20.
osteochondral regeneration. Cellular and Molecular Bio- https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035
engineering, vol.8: 416–432. 61. Ozbolat I T and Yu Y, 2013, Bioprinting toward organ fa-
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12195-015-0389-4 brication: Challenges and future trends. IEEE Transactions on
50. Shao X X, Hutmacher D W, Ho S T, et al., 2006, Evaluation Biomedical Engineering, vol.60: 60691–60699.
of a hybrid scaffold/cell construct in repair of high-load- https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912
bearing osteochondral defects in rabbits. Biomaterials, vol.27: 62. Fedorovich N E, Schuurman W, Wijnberg H M, et al., 2011,
1071–1080. Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.040 topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue
51. Cho D-W, Lee J-S, Jang J, et al., 2015, Tissue engineering: Engineering Part C: Methods, vol.18: 33–44.
Osteochondral tissue, In: Organ Printing, Bristol, UK: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0060
Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 11.1–11.6. 63. Park J Y, Choi J C, Shim J H, et al., 2014, A comparative
52. Chua C K, Leong K F, Sudarmadji N, et al., 2011, Selective study on collagen type I and hyaluronic acid dependent cell
laser sintering of functionally graded tissue scaffolds. MRS behavior for osteochondral tissue bioprinting. Biofabrication,
Bulletin, vol.36(12): 1006–1014. vol.6(3): 35004.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2011.271 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035004
53. Du Y, Liu H, Yang Q, et al., 2017, Selective laser sintering 64. Gurkan U A, El Assal R, Yildiz S E, et al., 2014, Engineering
scaffold with hierarchical architecture and gradient compo- anisotropic biomimetic fibrocartilage microenvironment by
sition for osteochondral repair in rabbits. Biomaterials, bioprinting mesenchymal stem cells in nanoliter gel droplets.
vol.137: 37–48. Molecular Pharmacology, vol.11: 2151–2159.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.021 https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/mp400573g

118 International Journal of Bioprinting (2017)–Volume 3, Issue 2