Page 174 - IJB-10-3
P. 174

International Journal of Bioprinting                                           3D bone: Current & future




               Various methods can be explored to overcome these   Ministry of Innovation and Technology from the National
            challenges, such as employing multi-material bioprinting   Research Development and Innovation Fund. The projects
            techniques for the creation of intricate structures with   (TKP2021-EGA-28  and  TKP2021-EGA-32) were  funded
            precise control over the mechanical properties, cell   by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary
            distribution,  and  concentration  of  bioactive  molecules.   from the National Research, Development and Innovation
            Recently, computer vision was utilized for bone    Fund, financed under the TKP2021-EGA funding scheme.
            bioprinting, encompassing common tasks such as
            controlling bone scaffold processes, implementing deep   Conflict of interest
            learning techniques, and assessing cell viability. The   The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
            findings revealed the capability of artificial intelligence to
            overcome current limitations and expedite advancements   Authors’ contributions
            within this domain.  Besides that, integrating pre-
                              87
            vascularization methods, such as co-culturing endothelial   Conceptualization: Borbála Lovászi, Zoltán Veréb
            cells with other cell types or using sacrificial materials,   Funding acquisition: Zoltán Veréb
            promotes the formation of functional vascular networks   Methodology: Borbála Lovászi
            within bioprinted constructs. 74                   Supervision: Zoltán Veréb
               External factors, such as mechanical forces, biochemical   Visualization: Diána Szűcs
            signals, and electrical impulses, can significantly affect the   Writing – original draft preparation: Borbála Lovászi
            formation of bone tissues. Bioreactors and other external   Writing – reviewing and editing: Diána Szűcs, Tamás
            stimuli can augment cell viability, specialization, and   Monostori, Lajos Kemény, Zoltán Veréb
            tissue maturation within printed biological constructs.
            Furthermore, the  advancement of  programmable     Ethics approval and consent to participate
            biomaterials adds a temporal dimension, suggesting that   Not applicable.
            four-dimensional (4D)-printed constructs can adapt their
            shape or function over time in response to environmental   Consent for publication
            changes.  In this regard, 4D bioprinting is anticipated to
                   88
            be the next frontier in bone regeneration technology. 87  Not applicable.
               By addressing these hurdles and exploring innovative   Availability of data
            approaches, bone bioprinting can progress toward
            developing functional tissue constructs with superior   Not applicable.
            regenerative capabilities for clinical applications in bone
            repair and regeneration. It should be mentioned that   References
            producing  engineered  tissues  for  therapeutic  purposes   1.   Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N. Bone regenerative
            also has its legal proceedings prior to market entry, such as   medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future
            medical device regulation (MDR) and good manufacturing   directions. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9(1):18.
            practice (GMP). 86                                    doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-18

            Acknowledgments                                    2.   Maresca JA, DeMel DC, Wagner GA, Haase C, Geibel JP.
                                                                  Three-dimensional bioprinting applications for bone tissue
            All  figures  were  generated  by  Borbála  Lovászi  using   engineering. Cells. 2023;12(9).
            BioRender (www.app.biorender.com).                    doi: 10.3390/cells12091230
                                                               3.   Masaeli R, Zandsalimi K, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Tayebi
            Funding                                               L. Challenges in three-dimensional printing of bone
            This   work    was   supported   by    GINOP_         substitutes. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019;25(5):387-397.
            PLUSZ-2.1.1-21-2022-00043 (co-financed by the European      doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2018.0381
            Union and the European Regional Development Fund)   4.   Mirkhalaf M, Men Y, Wang R, No Y, Zreiqat H. Personalized
            and the National Research, Development, and Innovation   3D printed bone scaffolds: a review.  Acta Biomater.
            Office (NKFIH PD 132570 to ZV). ZV is a recipient of   2023;156:110-124.
            the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian      doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.014
            Academy of Sciences (BO/00190/20/5) and the NPP-22-  5.   Do AV, Khorsand B, Geary SM, Salem AK. 3D printing of
            5 Bolyai+ Fellowship (NKP-22-5-SZTE-319), financed by   scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications.  Adv Healthc
            the New National Excellence Program of the Hungarian   Mater. 2015;4(12):1742-1762.


            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       166                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2056
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179