Page 123 - IJB-4-2

Physical stimulations and their osteogenesis-inducing mechanisms

accelerates the osteogenic differentiation and mineralization (PEMF). Songklanakarin J Sci Technol, 30(1): 25–29.
of dental pulp cells. Cytotechnology, 62(2): 143–155. https:// 71. Diniz P, Shomura K, Soejima K, et al., 2002, Effects of
doi.org/10.1007/s10616-010-9271-3 pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone
61. Yamamoto Y, Ohsaki Y, Goto T, et al., 2003, Effects of tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages
static magnetic fields on bone formation in rat osteoblast of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics, 23(5): 398–405.
cultures. J Dent Res, 82(12): 962–966. https://doi. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10032
org/10.1177/154405910308201205 72. Wang P, Liu J, Yang Y, et al., 2017, Differential intensity-
62. Aliabouzar M, Zhang L G, Sarkar K, 2016, Lipid coated dependent effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on
microbubbles and low intensity pulsed ultrasound enhance RANKL-induced osteoclast formation, apoptosis, and bone
chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells in 3D resorbing ability in RAW264.7 cells. Bioelectromagnetics,
printed scaffolds. Sci Rep, 6: 37728. https://doi.org/10.1038/ 38(8): 602–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22070
srep37728 73. Chang K, Hongshong C W, Yu Y H, et al., 2004, Pulsed
63. Jian Z, Chong D, Peng S, 2014, Alterations of mineral electromagnetic field stimulation of bone marrow cells
elements in osteoblast during differentiation under hypo, derived from ovariectomized rats affects osteoclast
moderate and high static magnetic fields. Biol Trace Elem formation and local factor production. Bioelectromagnetics,
Res, 162(1–3): 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011- 25(2): 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10168
014-0157-7 74. Zhao Z, Watt C, Karystinou A, et al., 2011, Directed
64. Di S, Tian Z, Qian A, et al., 2012, Large gradient high migration of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in
magnetic field affects FLG29.1 cells differentiation to form a physiological direct current electric field. Eur Cell Mater,
osteoclast-like cells. Int J Radiat Biol, 88(11): 806–813. 22: 344–358.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2012.698365 75. Banks T A, Luckman P S, Frith J E, et al., 2015, Effects of
65. Huang J, Liu W, Liang Y, et al., 2018, Preparation and electric fields on human mesenchymal stem cell behaviour
biocompatibility of diphasic magnetic nanocomposite and morphology using a novel multichannel device. Integr
scaffold. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 87: 70–77. Biol (Camb), 7(6): 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1039/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.02.003 c4ib00297k
66. Yun H M, Ahn S J, Park K R, et al., 2016, Magnetic 76. Creecy C M, O'Neill C F, Arulanandam B P, et al., 2013,
nanocomposite scaffolds combined with static magnetic field Mesenchymal stem cell osteodifferentiation in response
in the stimulation of osteoblastic differentiation and bone to alternating electric current. Tissue Eng Part A, 19(3–4):
formation. Biomaterials, 85: 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0091
j.biomaterials.2016.01.035 77. Wang X, Gao Y, Shi H, et al., 2016, Influence of the intensity
67. Feng S W, Lo Y J, Chang W J, et al., 2010, Static magnetic and loading time of direct current electric field on the
field exposure promotes differentiation of osteoblastic cells directional migration of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem
grown on the surface of a poly-L-lactide substrate. Med cells. Front Med, 10(3): 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/
Biol Eng Comput, 48(8): 793–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11684-016-0456-9
s11517-010-0639-5 78. Grunert P C, Jonitz-Heincke A, Su Y, et al., 2014, Establish-
68. Yan J L, Zhou J, Ma H P, et al., 2015, Pulsed electromagnetic ment of a novel in vitro test setup for electric and magnetic
fields promote osteoblast mineralization and maturation stimulation of human osteoblasts. Cell Biochem Biophys,
needing the existence of primary cilia. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 70(2): 805–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-014-9984-6
404: 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2015.01.031 79. Jin G H, Kim G H, 2013, The effect of sinusoidal AC electric
69. Zhou J, Xue-Yan L I, Chen K M, et al., 2010, Effect of stimulation of 3D PCL/CNT and PCL/β-TCP based bio-
sinusoidal electricity magnetic field at different intensity on composites on cellular activities for bone tissue regeneration.
the differentiation and collagen-I,BMP-2 mRNA expression J Mater Chem B, 1(10): 1439–1452.
of osteoblasts in vitro. Chin J Med Phys, 5: 2173–2177. 80. Rubin C, Bolander M, Ryaby J P, et al., 2001, The use
70. Kamolmatyakul S, Jinorose U, Prinyaroj P, et al., 2008, of low-intensity ultrasound to accelerate the healing of
Responses of human normal osteoblast cells and osteoblast- fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83-A(2): 259–270.
like cell line, MG-63 cells, to pulse electromagnetic field 81. Naruse K, Miyauchi A, Itoman M, et al., 2003, Distinct

16 International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 2