Page 371 - IJB-10-4
P. 371

International Journal of Bioprinting                                      3D-printed PEEK in cranioplasty




            Consent for publication                            11.  Rendas P, Figueiredo L, Machado C, Mourão A, Vidal
                                                                  C,  Soares  B.  Mechanical  performance  and bioactivation
            Consent to publish the data and images was obtained from   of 3D-printed PEEK for high-performance implant
            the subjects.                                         manufacture: a review. Prog Biomater. 2023;12(2):89-111.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s40204-022-00214-6
            Availability of data                               12.  Duarte LC, Chagas CLS, Ribeiro LEB, Coltro WKT. 3D
            The data used to support the findings of this study are   printing of microfluidic devices with embedded sensing
            available from the corresponding authors upon request.  electrodes for generating and measuring the size of
                                                                  microdroplets based on contactless conductivity detection.
            References                                            Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;251:427-432.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.011
            1.   Siracusa V, Maimone G, Antonelli V. State-of-art of standard   13.  Guvendiren M, Molde J, Soares RM, Kohn J. Designing
               and  innovative  materials  used  in  cranioplasty. Polymers.   biomaterials for 3D printing.  ACS Biomater Sci Eng.
               2021;13(9):1452.                                   2016;2(10):1679-1693.
               doi: 10.3390/polym13091452                         doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121
            2.   Ma Z, Zhao X, Zhao J, Zhao Z, Wang Q, Zhang C. Biologically   14.   Zhang J, Su Y, Rao X, et al. Additively manufactured polyether
               modified polyether ether ketone as dental implant material.   ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to
               Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8.                   titanium mesh in cranioplasty. Int J Bioprint. 2022;9(1):634.
               doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.620537                     doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i1.634
            3.   Kurtz  SM,  Devine  JN.  PEEK  biomaterials  in  trauma,   15.  Ozoner B. Cranioplasty following severe traumatic brain
               orthopedic, and spinal implants.  Biomaterials. 2007;28:   injury: role in neurorecovery.  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep.
               4845-4869.                                         2021;21(11):62.
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013            doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01147-6
            4.   Rinaldi M, Cecchini F, Pigliaru L, Ghidini T, Lumaca   16.  Khader BA, Towler MR. Materials and techniques used in
               F,  Nanni  F.  Additive  manufacturing  of  polyether  ether   cranioplasty fixation: a review.  Mater  Sci  Eng C. 2016;66:
               ketone (PEEK) for space applications: a nanosat polymeric   315-322.
               structure. Polymers. 2020;13(1):11.                doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.101
               doi: 10.3390/polym13010011
                                                               17.  Kang J, Zhang J, Zheng J, Wang L, Li D, Liu S. 3D-printed
            5.   Kurtz  SM,  Devine  JN.  PEEK  biomaterials  in  trauma,   PEEK implant for mandibular defects repair - a new method.
               orthopedic,  and  spinal  implants.  Biomaterials.   J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;116:104335.
               2007;28(32):4845-4869.                             doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104335
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
                                                               18.  Li Y, Li Z, Tian L, et al. Clinical application of 3D-printed
            6.   Rosenthal G, Ng I, Moscovici S, et al. Polyetheretherketone   PEEK implants for repairing mandibular defects.  J
               implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center   Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022;50(8):621-626.
               experience. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(5):523-9; discussion 528-9.     doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.06.002
               doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000477
                                                               19.  Liu D, Fu J, Fan H, et al. Application of 3D-printed PEEK
            7.   Yao S, Zhang Q, Mai Y, et al. Outcome and risk factors of   scapula prosthesis in the treatment of scapular benign fibrous
               complications after cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone   histiocytoma: a case report. J Bone Oncol. 2018;12:78-82.
               and titanium mesh: a single-center retrospective study. Front      doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.07.012
               Neurol. 2022;13:926436.
               doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.926436                  20.  Wang L, Liu X, Jiang T, Huang L. Three-dimensional
                                                                  printed polyether-ether-ketone implant for extensive
            8.   Zhang D, Qiu D, Gibson MA, et al. Additive manufacturing   chest wall reconstruction: a case report.  Thorac  Cancer.
               of ultrafine-grained high-strength titanium alloys. Nature.   2020;11(9):2709-2712.
               2019;576(7785):91-95.                              doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13560
               doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1783-1
                                                               21.   Mian SH, Moiduddin K, Elseufy SM, Alkhalefah H. Adaptive
            9.   Alimi OA, Meijboom R. Current and future trends of   mechanism for designing a personalized cranial implant and
               additive manufacturing for chemistry applications: a review.   its 3D printing using PEEK. Polymers. 2022;14(6):1266.
               J Mater Sci. 2021;56(30):16824-16850.              doi: 10.3390/polym14061266
               doi: 10.1007/s10853-021-06362-7
                                                               22.  Sharma N, Aghlmandi S, Dalcanale F, et al. Quantitative
            10.  Guzzi EA, Tibbitt MW. Additive manufacturing of precision   assessment of point-of-care  3D-printed patient-specific
               biomaterials. Adv Mater. 2020;32(13):e1901994.     polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranial implants. Int J Mol Sci.
               doi: 10.1002/adma.201901994                        2021;22(16):8521.



            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       363                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2583
   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376