Page 34 - IJB-5-1
P. 34

Shuai C
           be used in  AM techniques.  The material  used in  AM   3.   Heuijerjans A, Wilson W, Ito K, et al., 2017, The critical size
           of scaffolds should not only meet  the  requirements  of   of focal articular cartilage defects is associated with strains in
           medical applications but also need to meet the technical   the collagen fibers. Clin Biomech, 50: 40.
           requirements of AM. For instance, the resins used in SLA   4.   Yang Y, Wu  P, Wang  Q,  et al., 2016, The enhancement  of
           are very limited because the resin should be a liquid that   Mg corrosion resistance by alloying Mn and laser–melting.
           rapidly solidifies on illumination with light. What is more
           serious is the current SLA technique is still limited to the   Materials, 9(4): 216.
           use of a single resin at a time. As for materials used in   5.   Hoover S,  Tarafder  S, Bandyopadhyay  A,  et al., 2017,
           SLS or SLM, it should have good fluidity and thermal    Silver doped resorbable  tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for
           conductivity and the powder should have a suitable shape   bone graft applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,
           for powder application. In fact, powders used for SLM   79: 763–769.
           equipment require spherical shape and a uniform particle   6.   Faroni  A, Mobasseri  S  A, Kingham  P  J,  et al.,  2015,
           size distribution. To satisfy these specific requirements,
           it is necessary to develop the dedicated material system   Peripheral  nerve  regeneration:  Experimental  strategies  and
           for AM. On the other hand, hybrid materials integrate the   future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 82–83: 160–167.
           advantages of several materials, which may exhibit better   7.   Shau D, Patton R, Patel S, et al., 2018, Synthetic mesh vs.
           properties as used in AM scaffolds for bone regeneration.   Allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction in total knee
           Previous researches have confirmed that AM technology   arthroplasty – A systematic review of the literature and meta–
           could fabricate parts with multiple  materials.  These   analysis. Knee, 25(1): 2.
           compositional variations are not only expected to change   8.   Wang Z,  Wang C, Li C,  et al., 2017,  Analysis of factors
           their processability but also are expected to achieve better
           mechanical or biological properties.                    influencing bone ingrowth into three–dimensional printed porous
           There is no doubt that the application of AM scaffolds for   metal scaffolds: A review. J Alloys Compd, 717: 271–285.
           bone repair has a bright future. Thus, multidisciplinary   9.   Kumar A, Mandal S, Barui S, et al., 2016, Low temperature
           research  will  be  necessary  to  face  those  challenges   additive  manufacturing  of  three  dimensional  scaffolds  for
           and fully  realize  the  potential  of  AM in bone repair   bone–tissue engineering applications: Processing related
           applications in the coming days.                        challenges and property assessment.  Mater Sci Eng R,

           Conflicts of Interest                                   103: 1–39.
                                                               10.  Chevalier E, Chulia D, Pouget C, et al., 2008, Fabrication of
           There are no conflict of interest.
                                                                   porous substrates: A review of processes using pore forming
           Acknowledgments                                         agents in the biomaterial field. J Pharm Sci, 97(3): 1135–1154.
                                                               11.  Pia G, Casnedi L, Ionta M,  et al., 2015, On the elastic
           This work was supported by the following funds: (1)     deformation properties of porous ceramic materials obtained by
           The Natural Science  Foundation of China (51575537,
           81572577, 51705540);  (2) Hunan  Provincial  Natural    pore–forming agent method. Ceram Int, 41(9): 11097–11105.
           Science  Foundation  of China  (2016JJ1027); (3)  The   12.  Moghadam  M Z,  Hassanajili  S, Esmaeilzadeh  F,  et al.,
           Project of Innovation-driven Plan of Central South      2017, Formation of porous HPCL/LPCL/HA scaffolds with
           University  (2016CX023);  (4)  The  Open-End  Fund  for   supercritical CO  gas foaming method. J Mech Behav Biomed
                                                                              2
           the Valuable and Precision Instruments of Central South   Mater, 69: 115.
           University; (5) The fund of the State Key Laboratory of   13.  Costantini M, Colosi C, Mozetic P, et al., 2016, Correlation
           Solidification Processing in NWPU (SKLSP201605); (6)
           National  Postdoctoral Program for Innovative  Talents   between  porous  texture  and  cell  seeding  efficiency  of  gas
           (BX201700291); (7) The Project of State Key Laboratory   foaming and microfluidic foaming scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng
           of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central      C Mater Biol Appl, 62: 668–677.
           South University;  (8) The Project  of Hunan Provincial   14.  Theodorou G S, Eleana  K, Anna  T,  et al., 2016, Sol–Gel
           Science and Technology Plan (2017RS3008).               derived Mg–based ceramic scaffolds doped with zinc or copper

           References                                              ions: Preliminary results on their synthesis, characterization,
                                                                   and biocompatibility. Int J Biomater, 2016(1–2): 3858301.
           1.   Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, et al., 2017, Bone biomaterials and   15.  Ros–Tárraga P, Murciano A, Mazón P, et al., 2017, New 3D
               interactions with stem cells. Bone Res., 5(4): 17059.  stratified Si–Ca–P porous scaffolds obtained by sol–gel and
           2.   Currey J D, 2012,  The structure and mechanics  of bone.   polymer replica method: Microstructural, mineralogical and
               J. Mater. Sci., 47(1): 41–54.                       chemical characterization. Ceram Int, 43(8): 6548–6553.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1        17
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39