Page 39 - IJB-5-1
P. 39

Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds
               Process Technol, 258: 128–137.                      PLGA/β–TCP/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds in a
           127.  Demir A G, Monguzzi L, Previtali B, 2017, Selective laser   rabbit femoral defect model. Biofabrication, 4(2): 25003.
               melting  of pure Zn with high density for biodegradable   141.  Poh P S, Hutmacher D W, Holzapfel B M, et al., 2016, In vitro
               implant manufacturing. Add Manuf, 15: 20–28.        and  in vivo  bone formation potential  of surface calcium
           128.  Montani M, Demir A G, Mostaed E, et al., 2017, Processability   phosphate–coated  polycaprolactone  and polycaprolactone/
               of pure Zn and pure Fe by SLM for biodegradable metallic   bioactive  glass composite  scaffolds.  Acta  Biomater,
               implant manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J, 23(3): 514–523.  30: 319–333.
           129.  Hou Y, Jia G, Yue R, et al., 2018, Synthesis of biodegradable   142.  Frazier W E, 2014, Metal additive manufacturing: A review.
               Zn–based  scaffolds using NaCl templates:  Relationship   J Mater Eng Perform, 23(6): 1917–1928.
               between porosity, compressive properties and degradation   143.  Liang Hand Harris R, 2008, Customised Implants for Bone
               behavior. Mater Charact, 137: 305–315.              Replacement and Growth. US: Springer.
           130.  Hutmacher D W, 2000, Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone   144.  Ataee A, Li Y, Fraser D, et al., 2018, Anisotropic Ti–6Al–4V
               and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21(24): 2529–2543.     gyroid scaffolds manufactured  by electron  beam melting
           131.  Zhou C, Yang K, Wang K, et al., 2016, Combination of fused   (EBM) for bone implant applications. Mater Des, 137: 1-480.
               deposition modeling and gas foaming technique to fabricated   145.  Surmeneva  M, Surmenev  R,  Chudinova  E,  et al.,  2017,
               hierarchical  macro/microporous polymer scaffolds.  Mater   Fabrication  of  multiple–layered  gradient  cellular  metal
               Des, 109: 415–424.                                  scaffold  via  electron  beam  melting  for segmental  bone
           132.  Tellis B C, Szivek J A, Bliss C L, et al., 2008, Trabecular   reconstruction. Mater Des, 133: 195-204.
               scaffolds created  using micro CT guided fused deposition   146.  Li S J, Xu Q S, Wang Z, et al., 2014, Influence of cell shape
               modeling. Mater Sci Eng C, 28(1): 171–178.          on mechanical  properties  of  Ti–6Al–4V meshes fabricated
           133.  Kosorn W, Sakulsumbat M, Uppanan P, et al., 2017, PCL/  by electron  beam melting  method.  Acta Biomater, 10(10):
               PHBV blended three dimensional scaffolds fabricated  by   4537–4547.
               fused deposition  modeling  and responses of chondrocytes   147.  Shah F  A, Omar  O, Suska F,  et al., 2016, Long–term
               to the scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater,   osseointegration  of 3D printed  CoCr constructs  with  an
               105(5): 1141.                                       interconnected open–pore architecture prepared by electron
           134.  De  S R,  D’Amora  U, Russo  T,  et al.,  2015,  3D  fibre   beam melting. Acta Biomater, 36: 296–309.
               deposition and stereolithography techniques for the design of   148.  Zhao S, Li S J, Hou W T, et al., 2016, The influence of cell
               multifunctional nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds. J Mater   morphology on the compressive fatigue behavior of Ti–6Al–
               Sci Mater Med, 26(10): 250.                         4V  meshes  fabricated  by  electron  beam  melting.  J Mech
           135.  Vaezi  M,  Yang  S, 2015, Extrusion–based  additive   Behav Biomed Mater, 59: 251–264.
               manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual   149.  Zhao B, Wang H, Qiao N, et al., 2016, Corrosion resistance
               Phys Prototyp, 10(3): 123–135.                      characteristics of a Ti–6Al–4V alloy scaffold that is fabricated
           136.  Rinaldi M, Ghidini T, Cecchini F, et al., 2018, Additive layer   by electron  beam  melting  and  selective  laser  melting  for
               manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM. Compos   implantation in vivo. Mater Sci Eng C, 70(Pt 1): 832–841.
               Part B Eng, 145: 162-172.                       150.  Lv J,  Jia Z, Li J,  et al., 2015, Electron beam melting
           137.  Shim J H,  Won J  Y, Sung S J,  et al., 2015, Comparative   fabrication of porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds: Cytocompatibility
               efficacies of a 3D–printed PCL/PLGA/β–TCP membrane and   and osteogenesis. Adv Eng Mater, 17(9): 1391–1398.
               a titanium membrane for guided bone regeneration in beagle   151.  Algardh J K, Horn  T,  West H,  et al.,  2016, Thickness
               dogs. Polymers, 7(10): 2061–2077.                   dependency of mechanical properties for thin–walled titanium
           138.  Youssef  A, Hollister  S J, Dalton P D, 2017,  Additive   parts manufactured  by electron  beam melting  (EBM) ®;∗.
               manufacturing  of polymer  melts  for implantable medical   Add Manuf, 12: 45–50.
               devices and scaffolds. Biofabrication, 9(1): 12002.  152.  Eldesouky I, Harrysson  O,  West H,  et al., 2017, Electron
           139.  Xu  N,  Ye  X,  Wei  D,  et al.,  2014,  3D  artificial  bones  for   beam melted  scaffolds for orthopedic applications.  Add
               bone repair prepared by computed  tomography–guided   Manuf, 17: 169-175.
               fused deposition modeling for bone repair. Acs Appl Mater   153.  Rännar  L  E,  Gustafson  C  Gand  Glad  A,  2008,  Efficient
               Interfaces, 6(17): 14952–14963.                     cooling  with  tool  inserts  manufactured  by electron  beam
           140.  Kim J, Mcbride S, Tellis B, et al., 2012, Rapid–prototyped   melting. Rapid Prototyp J, 13(3): 128–135.

           22                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44