Page 36 - IJB-5-1

Shuai C
44. Kerativitayanan P, Tatullo M, Khariton M, et al., 2017, engineering. Acta Biomater, 10(2): 580–594.
Nanoengineered osteoinductive and elastomeric scaffolds 59. Sun W, Starly B, Nam J, et al., 2005, Bio–CAD modeling
for bone tissue engineering. Acs Biomater Sci Eng, and its applications in computer–aided tissue engineering.
3(4): 590–600. Comput Aided Des, 37(11): 1097–1114.
45. Thomas R C, Vu P, Shan P M, et al., 2017, Sacrificial crystal 60. Hollister S J, Chu T M, Guldberg R E, et al., 2002, Image
templated hyaluronic acid hydrogels as biomimetic 3D tissue Based Design and Manufacture of Scaffolds for Bone
scaffolds for nerve tissue regeneration. Acs Biomater Sci Eng, Reconstruction. IUTAM Symposium on Synthesis in Bio
3(7): 1172–1174. Solid Mechanics. pp163-174.
46. Altamimi A A, Fernandes P R A, Peach C, et al., 2017, 61. Hollister S J, 2005, Porous scaffold design for tissue
Metallic bone fixation implants: A novel design approach engineering. Nat Mater, 4(7): 518–524.
for reducing the stress shielding phenomenon. Virtual Phys 62. Podshivalov L, Gomes C M, Zocca A, et al., 2013, Design,
Prototyp, 12(2): 141–151. analysis and additive manufacturing of porous structures for
47. Osanov J K, 2016, Topology optimization for architected biocompatible micro–scale scaffolds -. Procedia Cirp, 5(1):
materials design. Ann Rev Mater Res, 46(1): 211–233. 247–252.
48. Guest J Kand Prévost J H, 2007, Design of maximum 63. Meyer U, Runte C, Dirksen D, et al., 2003, Image–Based
permeability material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Biomimetric Approach to Design and Fabrication of Tissue
Eng, 196(4–6): 1006–1017. Engineered Bone. Cars 2003. Computer Assisted Radiology
49. Guest J, Kand P J, 2006, Optimizing multifunctional materials: and Surgery. Proceedings of the International Congress and
Design of microstructures for maximized stiffness and fluid Exhibition, London. pp726–732.
permeability. Int J Solids Struct, 43(22): 7028–7047. 64. Pattanayak D K, Fukuda A, Matsushita T, et al., 2011,
50. Sturm S, Zhou S, Mai Y W, et al., 2010, On stiffness of Bioactive ti metal analogous to human cancellous bone:
scaffolds for bone tissue engineering – A numerical study. Fabrication by selective laser melting and chemical
J Biomech, 43(9): 1738–1744. treatments. Acta Biomater, 7(3): 1398–1406.
51. Huang, X X, 2010, Evolutionary Topology Optimization of 65. Terasaki O, 2005, Band structure of the P, D, and G surfaces.
Continuum Structures: Methods and Applications. Hoboken, Phys Rev B, 72(8):085459.
New Jersey: Wiley. 66. Lai M, Kulak A N, Law D, et al., 2007, Profiting from nature:
52. Huang X, Xie Y M, 2011, Topological design of macroporous copper with superior mechanical properties.
microstructures of cellular materials for maximum bulk or Chem Commun, 34(34): 3547–3549.
shear modulus. Comput Mater Sci, 50(6): 1861–1870. 67. Robb R A, 2005, Schwarz Meets Schwann: Design and
53. Osher S, Sethian J A, 1988, Fronts propagating with Fabrication of Biomorphic and Durataxic Tissue Engineering
curvature–dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton– Scaffolds. Palm Springs, CA, USA: Medical Image
Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys, 79(1): 12–49. Computing and Computer–assisted Intervention–miccai,
54. Li Q Z, 2008, A Variational Level set Method for the Topology International Conference. pp794–801.
Optimization of Steady–State Navier–Stokes Flow. USA: 68. Kapfer S C, Hyde S T, Mecke K, et al., 2011, Minimal surface
Academic Press Professional, Inc. scaffold designs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 32(29):
55. Challis V, Guest J K, 2010, Level set topology optimization 6875–6882.
of fluids in stokes flow. Int J Num Methods Eng, 79(10): 69. Melchels F W, Barradas A M, Blitterswijk C A, et al., 2010,
1284–1308. Effects of the architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds on
56. Takezawa A, Kobashi M, Takezawa A, et al., 2017, Design cell seeding and culturing. Acta Biomater, 6(11): 4208–4217.
methodology for porous composites with tunable thermal 70. Yang N, Quan Z, Zhang D, et al., 2014, Multi–morphology
expansion produced by multi–material topology optimization transition hybridization CAD design of minimal surface
and additive manufacturing. Compos Part B Eng, 131: 1-283. porous structures for use in tissue engineering. Comput Aided
57. Hollister S J, Levy R A, Chu T M, et al., 2000, An image– Des, 56(11): 11–21.
based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial 71. Yang N, Wang S, Gao L, et al., 2017, Building implicit–
scaffolds. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 29(1): 67–71. surface–based composite porous architectures. Compos
58. Giannitelli S M, Accoto D, Trombetta M, et al., 2014, Current Struct, 173: 35–43.
trends in the design of scaffolds for computer – Aided tissue 72. Zhou K Y, 2014, Effective method for multi–scale gradient

International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1 19