Page 41 - IJB-5-1
P. 41

Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds
           180.  Li K, Sun H, Sui H, et al., 2015, Composite mesoporous silica   bioactivity evaluation. Appl Surf Sci, 297(297): 1–8.
               nanoparticle/chitosan nanofibers for bone tissue engineering.   194.  Thöne  M, Leuders  S, Riemer A,  et al.,  2012,  Influence  of
               Rsc Adv, 5(23): 17541–17549.                        Heat–Treatment  on Selective  Laser Melting  Products –
           181.  Yong, D, 2015, In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the developed   e.g. Ti6Al4V.  Austin:  Annual International  Solid Freeform
               PLGA/HAp/Zein scaffolds for bone–cartilage interface   Fabrication Symposium.
               regeneration. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 28(1): 1.  195.  Wauthle  R, Vrancken  B, Beynaerts B,  et al., 2015, Effects
           182.  Bagchi  A, Meka S R, Rao B N,  et al., 2014, Perovskite   of build orientation and heat treatment on the microstructure
               ceramic nanoparticles in polymer composites for augmenting   and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V
               bone tissue regeneration. Nanotechnology, 25(48): 485101.  lattice structures. Add Manuf, 5: 77–84.
           183.  Rezvani Z,  Venugopal  J R, Urbanska  A M,  et al., 2016,   196.  Zhao X, Lui Y S, Choo C K, et al., 2015, Calcium phosphate
               A  bird’s  eye  view  on  the  use  of  electrospun  nanofibrous   coated  keratin–PCL scaffolds for potential  bone  tissue
               scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Current state–of–the–  regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C, 49: 746–753.
               art,  emerging directions  and future  trends.  Nanomedicine,   197.  Luo Y, Lode A, Wu C, et al., 2015, Alginate/nanohydroxyapatite
               12(7): 2181–2200.                                   scaffolds with designed core/shell structures fabricated by 3D
           184.  Min S K, Kim J H, Singh R K, et al., 2015, Therapeutic–  plotting and in situ mineralization for bone tissue engineering.
               designed electrospun bone scaffolds: Mesoporous bioactive   Acs Appl Mater Interfaces, 7(12): 6541–6549.
               nanocarriers  in  hollow  fiber  composites  to  sequentially   198.  Rifai A, Tran N, Dwm L, et al., 2018, Polycrystalline diamond
               deliver dual growth factors. Acta Biomater, 16(1): 103–116.  coating of additively manufactured titanium for biomedical
           185.  Rogina  A, 2014, Electrospinning process:  Versatile   applications. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces, 10(10): 8474–8484.
               preparation method for biodegradable and natural polymers   199.  Chen  H,  Wang  C,  Xiao  Y,  et al., 2016, Construction  of
               and biocomposite systems applied in tissue engineering and   surface HA/TiO 2 coating on porous titanium scaffolds and
               drug delivery. Appl Surf Sci, 296(8): 221–230.      its preliminary biological evaluation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater
           186.  Kenawy E,  Abdelhay  F I, Elnewehy M H,  et al., 2015,   Biol Appl, 70(Pt 2): 1047.
               Processing of polymer nanofibers through electrospinning as   200.  Chai Y C, Kerckhofs G, Roberts S J, et al., 2012, Ectopic bone
               drug delivery systems. Mater ChemPhys, 113(1): 296–302.  formation by 3D porous calcium phosphate–Ti6Al4V hybrids
           187.  Kolambkar Y M, Dupont K M, Boerckel J D, et al., 2011,   produced  by perfusion  electrodeposition.  Biomaterials,
               An alginate–based hybrid system for growth factor delivery   33(16): 4044–4058.
               in the functional repair of large bone defects. Biomaterials,   201.  Liao H T, Lee M Y, Tsai W W, et al., 2013, Osteogenesis of
               32(1): 65.                                          adipose-derived stem cells on polycaprolactone–β-tricalcium
           188.  Aleni A H, Ituarte I F, Mohite A,  et al., 2017, Comparing   phosphate scaffold fabricated via selective laser sintering and
               stiffness of solid and scaffold nano–TiO 2 structures produced   surface  coating  with  collagen  Type I.  J Tissue Eng  Regen
               by material extrusion method. Ceram Int, 44(2): 2231-2239.  Med, 10(10): E337.
           189.  Huang W, Zhang X, Wu Q, et al., 2013, Fabrication of HA/β-  202.  Chen C H, Lee  M  Y, Shyu  V B,  et al., 2014, Surface
               TCP scaffolds based on micro-syringe  extrusion  system.   modification  of  polycaprolactone  scaffolds  fabricated  via
               Rapid Prototyp J, 19(5): 319–326.                   selective  laser sintering  for cartilage  tissue engineering.
           190.  Zhou  K,  Dong  C,  Zhang  X,  et al.,  2015,  Preparation  and   Mater Sci Eng C, 40: 389–397.
               characterization of nanosilver–doped porous hydroxyapatite   203.  Huang  W, Zhang H, Huang  Y,  et al., 2011, Hierarchical
               scaffolds. Ceram Int, 41(1): 1671–1676.             porous carbon obtained from animal bone and evaluation in
           191.  Chen  Z,  Zhang  X,  Yang  Y,  et al., 2017, Fabrication and   electric double–layer capacitors. Carbon, 49(3): 838–843.
               characterisation  of 3D complex  hydroxyapatite  scaffolds   204.  Amin  Y S,  Van d S J,  Chai  Y C,  et al., 2014, Bone
               with hierarchical  porosity of different features for optimal   regeneration performance of surface–treated porous titanium.
               bioactive performance. Ceram Int, 43(1): 336–344.   Biomaterials, 35(24): 6172–6181.
           192.  Feng P, Niu M, Gao C,  et al., 2014,  A novel two–step   205.  Cheng A, Humayun A, Cohen D J, et al., 2014, Additively
               sintering for nano–hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue   manufactured  3D porous  Ti–6Al–4V constructs mimic
               engineering. Sci Rep, 4: 5599.                      trabecular bone structure and regulate osteoblast proliferation,
           193.  Liu F H, 2014, Synthesis of biomedical composite scaffolds   differentiation and local factor production in a porosity and
               by laser sintering: Mechanical  properties and  in vitro   surface roughness dependent  manner.  Biofabrication, 6(4):

           24                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 1
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46