Page 137 - IJB-10-5
P. 137

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Liver printing: from structure to application


































            Figure 5. The 3D bioprinting process. The figure was created using BioRender (BioRender.com). Abbreviations: CAD, computer-aided design; CT,
            computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.



            4.1. Bioinks                                       viscoelasticity of a material is also crucial for protecting
            Bioink is fundamental to 3D bioprinting, ideally requiring   cells from the effects of high-shear stress. Viscoelasticity is
            three key qualities: printability (mechanical properties),   a time-dependent mechanical property that combines the
            cell viability maintenance, and guidance of cell behavior   characteristics of an elastic solid and a viscous liquid, and it
            (biological properties). This necessitates balancing   is a nearly universal characteristic of the ECM of biological
            mechanical and biological performance 104,105  (Figure 6A).   tissues. Viscoelastic materials exhibit an instantaneous
            Mechanical properties refer to the ability of the printing   elastic response to applied stress, store energy, and have a
            material to form a stable 3D structure with high structural   time-dependent viscous response that dissipates energy.
            integrity and fidelity after printing, while also ensuring that   Additionally, these materials can also exhibit distinct
            the viability and performance of cells are not negatively   features, such as stress relaxation (decay of stress under
            affected by the bioprinting process, such as the high   constant strain) and creep (increased deformation of
            shear forces in extrusion-based printing.  In extrusion-  an  object  under  constant applied stress). 108,109   Rizwan
                                             106
            based printing, bioink is extruded and deposited onto a   et al. designed a viscoelastic hydrogel using hyaluronan
            collection platform in a controlled manner in filaments,   and laminin via an adjustable stress relaxation rate. This
            thus emphasizing the viscosity demands of the bioprinting   hydrogel could mimic the stress relaxation rate of the liver
            process.  Viscosity  refers  to  the  degree  of  stickiness;   under physiological conditions and support the growth of
            generally, substances with higher viscosity correspond   cholangiocyte organoids. 110
            to less flow, while those with lower viscosity would flow
            more  easily.  Lower  viscosity  is  required  during  printing   Biological performance generally requires  bioinks
            to facilitate material extrusion from the printhead, while   to have low cytotoxicity and support cell adhesion,
            higher viscosity is required post-extrusion to maintain   proliferation, and migration, thereby facilitating cell
            the stability of the printed structure.  Hence, materials   functionality. In particular, they also support cell-mediated
                                          107
            with shear-thinning characteristics (i.e., non-Newtonian   matrix remodeling, which is crucial for regulating ECM
            behavior where viscosity decreases with increasing shear   production and remodeling. The advancement in tissue
            rate) are widely used in many 3D bioprinting applications.   engineering techniques has redefined the biocompatibility
            When subjected to high shear stress, shear-thinning   of implanted materials not only to coexist with endogenous
            hydrogels exhibit low viscosity and return to their   tissues without adverse immune reactions but also to
            original viscosity after the shear stress is removed. The   actively modulate inflammatory responses, support

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       129                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3819
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142