Page 215 - IJB-10-5
P. 215

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Biomimetic osteochondral scaffold

































            Figure 4.  Characterization  of  spatially  controlled  release  behavior  of  osteochondral  scaffolds.  (A)  Schematic  illustration  of  osteochondral  scaffolds
            encapsulated in gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) gels. (B) Percentage release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and fibroblast growth factor-18
            (FGF-18) and (C) concentration of released BMP-2/FGF-18 every 3 days in the cartilage layer of the scaffolds. (D) Percentage release of BMP-2/FGF-18
            and (E) concentration of released BMP-2/FGF-18 every 3 days in the subchondral layer of the scaffolds. Abbreviation: GF, growth factor.


            3.4. Characterization of rat bone marrow           Dead staining images revealed that, in the subchondral
            mesenchymal stem cell microspheres                 and interface layers, most rBMSCs that were stained with
            After 24 h of cultivation in the microwell culture plate,   green fluorescence (alive) after 1 and 3 days of cultivation
            the rBMSCs spontaneously aggregated into rBMSC     had a fusiform shape, and only a few rBMSCs were stained
            microspheres (Figure 5A). The size distribution of   with red fluorescence (dead). Likewise, in the cartilage
            microspheres was concentrated in the range of 110–120   and interface layers, most rBMSCs in microspheres were
            μm, with an average diameter of 116.84 ± 11.39 μm (Figure   alive (green), and only a few rBMSCs were dead (red)
            5B). The SEM images revealed that rBMSCs  aggregated   (Figure 6A). Quantitative analysis demonstrated that more
            into rBMSC microspheres, and most rBMSCs in the    than 90% of the rBMSCs remained alive during the 3-day
            microspheres exhibit a rounded morphology with short   cultivation in each layer (Figure 6B), indicating that the
            or even no tentacles (Figure 5C). The fluorescence images   osteochondral scaffolds  had excellent biocompatibility.
            further revealed that the rBMSCs aggregated into rBMSC   The proliferation of rBMSCs was assessed using the CCK-
            microspheres with a relatively uniform size (Figure 5D).   8 assay. The absorbance increased in each group with
            Furthermore, taking inspiration from the aggregation   increasing culture time, indicating that the osteochondral
            of hyaline chondrocytes into spherical cartilage lacunae   tissue scaffold provided a conducive environment for
            distributed within the extracellular matrix (ECM), rBMSC   rBMSC proliferation (Figure 6C).
            microspheres were encapsulated by GelMA hydrogel to
            mimic the structural characteristics of native cartilage   3.6. Osteogenic/chondrogenic differentiation
            lacunae (Figure 5E). These data indicated the successful   of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in
            formation of rBMSC microspheres, which are structurally   osteochondral scaffolds
            similar to cartilage lacunae.                      To investigate the osteogenic or chondrogenic
                                                               differentiation of rBMSCs with different organizational
            3.5. Viability and proliferation of rat bone marrow   morphologies in the whole osteochondral scaffolds,
            mesenchymal stem cells on osteochondral scaffolds  rBMSCs were seeded in the subchondral layer and rBMSC
            To  assess  the  viability  of  rBMSCs  with  different   microspheres  were  seeded  in  the  cartilage  layer.  The
            organizational morphologies in the osteochondral scaffolds,   osteogenic potential of rBMSCs in osteochondral scaffolds
            rBMSCs or rBMSC microspheres were individually seeded   was investigated by visualizing the expression of RUNX2,
            in the subchondral, interface, or cartilage layer. The Live/  COL I, and OCN through immunofluorescence staining



            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       207                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3229
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220