Page 255 - IJB-10-5
P. 255

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  3D printed hydrogels for tumor therapy

























































            Figure 8. Swelling behavior (A), in vitro degradation behavior (B), pH change (C), Ca  release (D), and Mg  release (E) of 3D-printed GelMA, HAp/
                                                                                  2+
                                                                    2+
            GelMA, MgHAp/GelMA, and MgHAp/GelMA-PDA hydrogels.

            DOX was released from the hydrogels under NIR laser   different pH values (pH 4.5 and 7.4) is essential. As shown
            irradiation (Figure 9D). Additionally, a higher power   in Figures 9E and S6, Supporting Information, compared
            density of NIR laser elicited a larger release of DOX.   to PDA@DOX particles in which DOX could be quickly
            The NIR laser irradiation greatly promoted DOX release   released in 12 h in either PBS or acidic solution, DOX
            from MgHAp/GelMA-PDA@DOX hydrogels, which was      could be sustainably released from MgHAp/GelMA-
            possibly due to the Brownian movements of molecules.   PDA@DOX hydrogels for more than 7 days in an
            The entropy and temperature of MgHAp/GelMA-PDA@    acidic environment while the release of DOX reached a
            DOX hydrogels was enhanced when heated by NIR laser   plateau after 3 days being immersed in PBS at pH 7.4.
            irradiation, thereby accelerating the movements of DOX   The sustained DOX release in acidic environment would
            molecules and the disintegration of hydrogels.     achieve a prolonged therapeutic effect and hence could

               Since the tumor microenvironment is often acidic and   facilitate cell membrane permeability and effectively kill
            hypoxic, studying DOX release in buffer solutions with   tumor cells.
                                                                        64

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       247                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3526
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260