Page 279 - IJB-10-5
P. 279

International Journal of Bioprinting                                A TPMS framework for complete dentures




            Table 7. Comparison between finite element (FE) simulation and experimental results
                                    Elastic modulus (GPa)                       Yield strength (MPa)
                            EV           SV           EV/SV           EV             SV            EV/SV

             A-II           8.46      14.66 (±0.7)     57.71          81.21        159 (±6.8)       51.08
             A-III          10.54     18.43 (±1.1)     57.19         126.56        180 (±12.2)      70.31
             B-I            20.81     30.42 (±2.2)     68.41         205.32        281 (±27.3)      73.08
             C-II           9.31      17.38 (±1.4)     53.57         105.27        178 (±9.7)       59.14
             C-III          14.93     22.14 (±3.1)     67.43         164.88        214 (±12.5)      77.05
             Characteristic                                           Sample
                                         A-II           A-III          B-I            C-II          C-III
             Elastic modulus (GPa)
               EV                         8.46          10.54          20.81          9.31          14.93
               SV                      14.66 ± 0.7    18.43 ± 1.1    30.42 ± 2.2    17.38 ± 1.4   22.14 ± 3.1
               EV/SV                     57.71          57.19          68.41         53.57          67.43
             Yield strength (MPa)
               EV                        81.21          126.56        205.32         105.27         164.88
               SV                       159 ± 6.8     180 ± 12.2     281 ± 27.3     178 ± 9.7      214 ± 12.5
               EV/SV                     51.08          70.31          73.08         59.14          77.05
            Abbreviations: EV, experimental value; SV, simulation value.



            Table 8. Three-point bending experimental results
             Characteristic                                            Sample
                                           A-II          A-III          B-I           C-II          C-III
             Flexural modulus (GPa)      8.36 ± 0.7    10.26 ± 0.5    13.67 ± 1.5    9.71 ± 0.9    11.67 ± 1.1
             Bending strength (MPa)     325.71 ± 18.9  410.97 ± 23.5  603.76 ± 22.6  436.92 ± 19.3  468.52 ± 20.9



            4. Conclusion                                      (ii)  In  comparison  to  the  uniform  C-III  with  a
                                                                    relative density of 45%, B-I exhibited significant
            In this study, we investigated the mechanical properties   improvements  in  mechanical  performance,
            of functionally graded TPMS structures manufactured     encompassing a 39.38% increase in elastic modulus
            using SLM with Ti6Al4V powder. These structures were    (reaching 30.42 GPa), a 24.53% increase in yield
            then applied to the framework design of IFCDs. The main   strength (reaching 205.32 MPa), a 28.87% increase
            findings of this study can be summarized as follows:    in flexural strength (reaching 603.76 MPa), and an
            (i)   Finite element analysis (FEA) revealed that the   impact toughness of 7.95 J/cm² (higher than that
                                                                                                        2
                 B-I exhibited a more uniform stress distribution   of the homogeneous sample, i.e., 6.96 J/cm ). All
                 during the compression process and demonstrated    samples exhibited a similar failure mode during
                 significant mechanical performance  and energy     compression, forming 45° shear bands.
                 absorption  advantages  compared  to  other  models.   (iii)  In comparison to a hollow IFCD framework of
                 In comparison to the homogeneous model, B-I        the same weight, the functionally graded IFCD
                 displayed a 23.8% increase in yield strength, a 27.3%   framework not only met the requirements for
                 increase in elastic modulus, and a 29.1% increase in   masticatory function but also exhibited superior
                 energy absorption capacity.                        mechanical performance, particularly in the molar


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       271                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3453
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284