Page 277 - IJB-10-5

International Journal of Bioprinting A TPMS framework for complete dentures

Figure 12. The microstructural features of the sample surface were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), revealing the (A) top, (B)
middle, and (C) bottom views of the sample. (D) Magnified images of surface particles. (E) Microstructural morphology of the sample’s cross-section. (F)
Microstructure of the sample following etching treatment.

in Table 7 indicate that the ratios fall within the range. elastic modulus (by ~86%) and stronger compressive
Consistent with the findings from FEA, the B-I sample strength (by ~27%). 48
demonstrated superior mechanical properties, exhibiting The deformation modes of the five samples under
a 39.38% higher elastic modulus and a 24.53% increase in compression loading are depicted in Figure 13A. During
yield strength compared to C-III. In addition, compared the compression process, all the samples exhibit similar
to conventional body-centered cubic and cubic lattice deformation modes, characterized by the formation of
structures, the B-I sample exhibits a significantly higher shear bands at a 45° angle to the direction of compression

Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024) 269 doi: 10.36922/ijb.3453