Page 305 - IJB-10-5
P. 305

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 Proteins-loaded 3D-printed PEEK cage




            Table 1. Primers for osteogenesis-related genes
             Target gene                                          Primers
                                           Forward (5’–3’)                          Reverse (5’–3’)
             ACTB                     ATTTCTGAATGGCCCAGGT                     CTGCCTCAACACCTCAACC
             GAPDH                    GCTCTCCAGAACATCATCC                      TGCTTCACCACCTTCTTG
             RUNX2                  GCCGTAGAGAGCAGGGAAGAC                    CTGGCTTGGATTAGGGAGTCAC
             ALP                     AGCGACACGGACAAGAAGC                       GGCAAAGACCGCCACATC
             COLI                     CCTGAGCCAGCAGATTGA                        TCCGCTCTTCCAGTCAG
             OCN                     GAGGGCAGTAAGGTGGTGAA                     COTCCTGGAAGCCAATGTG
             OPN                      GACAGCAACGGGAAGACC                       CAGGCTGGCTTTGGAACT
             OPG                      GCCCAGACGAGATTGAGAG                     CAGACTGTGGGTGACGGTT
            Abbreviations: ACTB, Actin-β; ALP, Alkaline phosphatase; COLI, Collagen type I; GAPDH, Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; OCN,
            Osteocalcin; OPN, Osteopontin; OPG, Osteoprotegerin; RUNX2, Runt-related transcription factor 2.

            was employed (Figure 2A). The surface topographies   the poorest cytoactivity after days 4 and 7 of culture,
            of PEEK after each treatment were notably altered    possibly due to the residual sulfuric acid. Furthermore,
            (Figure 2B). Before treatment, PEEK displayed a smooth   after BMP2-loading and sealing with Gel/Chi multilayer
            surface, with minor lines due to FDM. However, a porous   films, cell viability in S-P-BMP2/LBL was greatly enhanced.
            network structure appeared on the PEEK surface after   Additionally, the cytocompatibility of S-P-BMP2/LBL-SP
            sulfonation that can be used as a storage pool for BMP2.   was further improved after being grafted with recruiting
            No obvious change was observed in the surface network   protein P. Notably, cell distribution on the surface of S-P
            structure of PEEK after loading with BMP2. However,   appeared stripy, which may be attributed to the line path
            after LBL coating with Gel/Chi multilayer films, the porous   of  extruding and  stacking PEEK  during  the FDM 3D
            network structure became less distinct, and the surface   printing process. Sulfonation treatment accentuated these
            was further smoothed after grafting with SP. The surface   line paths (Figure 3B), as MSCs tend to grow along them.
            roughness of different samples was evaluated with AFM.   However, after coating Gel/Chi films, cell distributions
            The results (Figure 2D  and  E) displayed a similar trend   on S-P-BMP2/LBL and S-P-BMP2/LBL-SP became less
            with  SEM.  S-P  and S-P-BMP2  have the  highest surface   pronounced. These results are highly consistent with the
            roughness due to sulfonation. However, after coating   surface roughness observations.
            with Gel/Chi multilayer films, the surface roughness
            decreased significantly.                           3.3. In vitro release of bioactive molecules and
                                                               recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells
               The water contact angle was used to evaluate the   Figure 4A illustrates the cumulative release of BMP2 and
            hydrophilicity of PEEK after each treatment process. The   the recruiting protein P. The recruiting protein P was
            results indicated that 3D-printed PEEK exhibited poorer   released rapidly within the first 72 h, reaching its peak
            hydrophilicity even after treatment with sulfonation and   after 120 h. The rapid release of the recruiting protein P
            loading with BMP2. However, its hydrophilicity could be   facilitates the recruitment of MSCs upon implantation.
            improved by coating with Gel/Chi multilayer films due to   The transwell assay was used to evaluate the recruitment
            the good hydrophilicity of gelatin. Previous studies have   effects of BMP2, with 1 × 10  MSCs seeded in the upper
                                                                                      4
            demonstrated that good hydrophilicity and appropriate   chamber (Figure 4B). After 12 and 24 h, the migrated
            roughness  of  the  material  surface  could  enhance  its
            bioactivity. Furthermore,  changes in  the  water  contact   MSCs were evaluated using a crystal violet solution.
            angle confirmed that the modified BMP2/SP-loaded PEEK   Figure 4C displays the migration of MSCs from the
            was successfully prepared (Figure 2C).             upper chamber onto the surface of PEEK. After 12 h,
                                                               more MSCs were found on the surfaces of S-P-BMP2/
            3.2. Cytocompatibility assay in vitro              LBL and S-P-BMP2/LBL-SP, particularly evident in the
            To determine the cytocompatibility of different samples,   S-P-BMP2/LBL-SP  group  (Figure  4C).  This  tendency
            we evaluated the cell viability and morphology of MSCs.   became more pronounced after 24 h, with a remarkable
            Figure 3A  and  C indicates that pure 3D-printed PEEK   interconnected network of purple MSCs and an increase
            has good cytoactivity, with the absence of dead cells on its   in  cell  numbers  (Figure  4D).  The  results  in  Figure  3
            surface. However, after sulfonation, the S-P group reported   indicate  that  the  sulfonation  treatment  group  has  the


            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       297                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3574
   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310