Page 113 - IJB-6-2
P. 113

Owen, et al.
           into the calcium chloride solution, thus forming    and  therefore  will  have  a  thin  layer  of  water
           larger beads.                                       surrounding them. This means that the emulsion
             In  initial  experiments  (data  not  shown),  we   interface around these large alginate beads should
           produced very large millimeter-sized beads when     be the same as if it were a water droplet – it will be
           a slower speed or larger gauge needle was used.     surrounded by a thin film of surfactant stabilized
           Furthermore, very large beads were often created    monomer that on polymerization would contract
           when setting up and removing the syringe as the     to create an open surface porosity. As the alginate
           alginate  solution could occasionally  drop into    beads have been made in a separate process to the
           the calcium chloride solution; hence, all alginate   emulsion, both the porosity in the polyHIPE from
           beads  above  780  μm  were  sieved  out  after     the water droplets and the macropores from the
           bead manufacture  was complete.  The alginate       alginate  beads can be controlled  independently
           beads  were  not  sieved  further,  as  we  wanted  to   to  each  other,  unlike  when  heating  or  solvent
           preserve the size distribution to create a range of   destabilization is used .
                                                                                    [23]
           macropores within the polyHIPE; a polydisperse        As  expected,  when  porosity  increased
           bead  distribution  should have  a  better  packing   compressive modulus decreased (Figure 3).
           efficiency  than  a  monodisperse  one  yielding  an   Interestingly,  as  porosity  increased  the  standard
           interconnected macropore network throughout the     plasma treatment applied to polyHIPEs to increase
           scaffold.  However,  alternative  direct  fabrication   hydrophilicity  in  our group resulted  in  sample
           methods to have tighter control over alginate bead   charring (data not shown) . We hypothesize that
                                                                                       [17]
           size  and shape may  be desirable.  These  could    this is due to the high energy ions in the plasma
           include electrospraying  and microfluidics  to      impacting and accumulating within the polyHIPE
                                                      [54]
                                 [53]
           produce a more monodisperse size distribution.      macropores introduced by alginate bead leaching,
             The  ratios  of  alginate  beads  (0,  50,  and   resulting in localized heating and charring. This
           100  wt%)  relative  to  the  initial  HIPE  weight   is supported  by greater  charring  occurring  in
           were  chosen  as  this  broad  range  affords  us  a   the 100 wt% than the 50 wt% alginate porogen
           baseline  understanding  of the  feasibility  of    leached  polyHIPE  scaffolds,  and  the  apparent
           combining  alginate  bead porogen leaching  with    localization of the charring to the macropores. In
           emulsion  templating  and  their  effect  on  the   the plain polyHIPEs which do not possess these
           polyHIPE  scaffold  morphology.  Here,  alginate    macropores, these ions are carried over the surface
           beads were incorporated into the HIPE at up to      of the polyHIPE meaning that no charring occurs.
           100 wt% of the emulsion with no visual signs of     To alleviate this, the combination of lower power,
           emulsion destabilization.  The polymer struts of    reduced starting pressure to increase air flow rate,
           the polyHIPE surface that has cured against the     and shorter treatment times were tested, finding that
           alginate beads have a smooth surface composed       a 70% reduction in power eliminated the charring
           of numerous pores of different sizes. Rather than   entirely whilst still reducing the hydrophobicity of
           the  classical  polyHIPE  morphology  observed  in   the scaffold.
           the  bulk  of  the  plain  polyHIPE,  the  pore  shape   Seeding efficiency was significantly greater in
           at  this  interface  appears  different  as  the  water   the 100 wt% scaffolds than the plain polyHIPEs as
           droplets in the initial emulsion have been pressed   the larger pores allowed cells and media to penetrate
           and deformed against the smooth alginate surface    the  porous network more easily  (Figure  4A).
           before polymerization. Regardless of the shape of   Although  there  was  no  significant  difference  at
           the alginate bead the polyHIPE retained an open     day 7, metabolic activity was significantly higher
           pore surface and overall mirrored the curved shape   in 100 wt% samples than plain polyHIPEs by day
           of the alginate it cured against. The polymerized   14. PrestoBlue measures the reduction of resazurin
           boundary layer between the alginate surface and     to fluorescent resorufin. This must be completely
           polyHIPE had open connected pores. We assume        eluted  from  the  samples  for  the  fluorescence  to
           this is because the alginate beads are 97% water    correlate to the cell number. This is more difficult

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 2       109
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118