Page 120 - IJB-6-4
P. 120
3D printing of anisotropic bone structure
5 Conclusion 3. Nakano T, Kaibara K, Tabata Y, et al., 2002, Unique
Alignment and Texture of Biological Apatite Crystallites
A 3D bone-mimetic anisotropic microstructure in Typical Calcified Tissues Analyzed by Microbeam x-ray
was fabricated using the laminated layer method of Diffractometer System. Bone, 31:479–87. DOI: 10.1016/
oriented collagen sheets. Osteoblasts successfully s8756-3282(02)00850-5.
constructed the aligned mineralized matrix 4. Nakano T, Kaibara K, Ishimoto T, et al., 2012, Biological
with differentiation into mature osteocytes. The Apatite (BAp) Crystallographic Orientation and Texture as a
osteocytes embedded inside the scaffolds showed New Index for Assessing the Microstructure and Function of
an ordered arrangement of the cell body as well Bone Regenerated by Tissue Engineering. Bone, 51:741–7.
as dendritic cell process, which remodeled their DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.003.
extrusion/degeneration depending on the flow 5. Hennessy KM, Pollot BE, Clem WC, et al., 2009, The Effect
direction. These findings indicate that functional of Collagen I Mimetic Peptides on Mesenchymal Stem Cell
adaptation of osteocytes in response to mechanical Adhesion and Differentiation, and on Bone Formation at
stimuli is regulated by the remodeling of cell Hydroxyapatite Surfaces. Biomaterials, 30:1898–909. DOI:
processes mediated by Src expression in focal 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.053.
adhesions. 6. Lee S, Obata A, Brauer DS, et al., 2015, Dissolution Behavior
and Cell Compatibility of Alkali-free MgO-CaO-SrO-TiO2-
Acknowledgments P2O5 Glasses for Biomedical Applications. Biomed Glasses,
This research was funded by Grants-in-Aid for 1:151–8. DOI: 10.1515/bglass-2015-0015.
Scientific Research (S) (grant number 18H05254) 7. Prewitz MC, Seib FP, von Bonin M, et al., 2013, Tightly
and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) Anchored Tissue-mimetic Matrices as Instructive Stem
(grant number 20H00308). Cell Microenvironments. Nat Methods, 10:788–794. DOI:
10.1038/nmeth.2523.
Conflicts of interest 8. Bonewald LF, 2011, The Amazing Osteocyte. J Bone Miner
Res, 26:229–38. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.320.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. 9. Odagaki N, Ishihara Y, Wang Z, et al., 2018, Role of Osteocyte-
PDL Crosstalk in Tooth Movement via SOST/Sclerostin. J
Authors’ contributions
Dent Res, 97:1374–82. DOI: 10.1177/0022034518771331.
T. N. and A. MT. designed the study. T. M., A. 10. Ganesh T, Laughrey LE, Niroobakhsh M, et al., 2020,
MK., and A. MT. carried out the experiments. T. Multiscale Finite Element Modeling of Mechanical Strains
M., A. MT., P. W., and T. N. contributed to the and Fluid Flow in Osteocyte Lacunocanalicular System.
interpretation of the results. A. MT. drafted the Bone, 2020:115328. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115328.
manuscript, P. W. and T. N. revised the manuscript 11. Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2016, Print Me An Organ! Why
content. All the authors contributed to the We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci, 2016:101145.
discussion of the results. 12. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future
Perspectives in Extrusion-based Bioprinting. Biomaterials,
References 76:321–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076.
13. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A Comprehensive
1. Ishimoto T, Nakano T, Umakoshi Y, et al., 2013, Degree Review on Droplet-based Bioprinting: Past, Present
of Biological Apatite c -axis Orientation Rather than Bone and Future, Biomaterials, 102:20–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.
Mineral Density Controls Mechanical Function in Bone biomaterials.2016.06.012.
Regenerated Using Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic 14. Ng WL, Lee JM, Yeong WY, et al., 2017, Microvalve-based
Protein-2. J Bone Miner Res, 28:1170–9. DOI: 10.1002/ Bioprinting Process, Bio-inks and Applications. Biomater
jbmr.1825. Sci, 5:632–47. DOI: 10.1039/c6bm00861e.
2. Schaff F, Bech M, Zaslansky P, et al., 2015, Six-dimensional 15. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat Polymerization-
Real and Reciprocal Space Small-angle X-ray Scattering based Bioprinting Process, Materials, Applications and
Tomography. Nature, 527:353–6. DOI: 10.1038/nature16060. Regulatory Challenges. Biofabrication, 12:22001. DOI:
116 International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 4

