Page 123 - IJB-6-4
P. 123

Tan, et al.
           harvesting devices, to prosthetic bionic skins .    remains edible, which is the requirement for 3D
                                                        [3]
           The  adoption  of  3D  printing  technology  offers   food printing. In addition, enzymatic crosslinking
           multiple  advantages over traditional  techniques   does not produce free radicals and uncrosslinked
           to  fabricate  scaffolds,  including  uniformity  and   monomers derived from photocrosslinking
           reproducibility  in manufacturing, reduction  of    reactions that might adversely affect the cellular
           user error, and precise control over scaffold pore   conditions. Both photocrosslinking and enzymatic
           size,  connectivity,  and  geometry .  Among  the   crosslinking are permanent and confer mechanical
                                            [6]
           materials used in extrusion-based printing, natural   strength to the crosslinked gelatin chains required
           biopolymers such as collagen, gelatin, and chitosan   for 3D printing.  TG is often added to gelatin
           are promising candidates for bioprinting and food   to facilitate  the formation of the peptide  bond
           printing due to their excellent  biocompatibility   between the  γ-carbonyl group of glutamine
           and abundance of cell recognition sites  [7,8] . In   residue and the ε-amino group of a lysine residue
           addition, natural biopolymers such as gelatin       within the gelatin .  The formation  of peptide
                                                                                 [9]
           are inexpensive to fabricate, and they can be       bonds  stabilizes  the  structure  of  the  printed
           synthesized with relative ease . Essential physical   scaffold  and  improves  its  structural  integrity.
                                       [9]
           properties  (such  as  stiffness  and  water  content)   This  enzymatic  crosslinking  is  favored  among
           can be altered to obtain  similar  elastic  modulus   other available methods of crosslinking (such as
           of native tissues such as skeletal muscle, which    chemical crosslinking) due to the low occurrence
           was previously  reported  to  be  within  the  range   of side reactions (due to substrate specificity) and
           of 10 – 50 kPa . Finally, gelatin is a generally    no  cellular  toxicity  of  the  enzymes.  The  use  of
                          [10]
           edible  material  and  can  eventually  be  used for   enzymes also eliminates the need for specialized
           food printing as a ready-to-eat product without     equipment and other photo-sensitive additives that
           the need for post-processing.  These properties     may be toxic in nature .
                                                                                    [9]
           make the gelatin as a desirable candidate for the     DIW 3D printing has been widely demonstrated
           application in 3D printing.                         in 3D printing for polymers, foods, hydrogels [13, 14] .
             3D printing of gelatin would require adequate     Polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol were 3D printed
           control over the physical properties of the gelatin   to serve as coating layers for controlling the
           inks. The melting point of gelatin is 30 – 37°C,    drug release  of active  ingredients .  For  the
                                                                                                  [15]
           depending  on  their  bloom  strength,  pH,  and    application  in  food  printing,  rheology-modified
           concentration ;  gelatin  is  unable  to  hold/retain   food inks have  been  printed  using a DIW 3D
                        [11]
           its  structure  and  would melt  at  physiological   printer to model complex 3D shapes without
           temperature.  Permanent  peptide  bonds need  to    temperature  control . Potato starch-containing
                                                                                  [5]
           be formed between amino acids to ensure the         anthocyanin and lemon juice was 3D printed as
           integrity of the structure in a liquid medium and   a two-part gel system exhibited  time-dependent
           at  physiological  temperature.  Among  the  most   color  change  in  response  to  the  diffusion  of
           employed  techniques to achieve  permanent          hydrogen ions from the lemon juice layer into the
           crosslinking are photocrosslinking and enzymatic    anthocyanin layer . Such 3D-printable hydrogels
                                                                                [16]
           crosslinking.    Photocrosslinking      between     included  photo-curable  polyethylene  glycol
           methacryloyl  groups in  Gelatin-Methacryloyl       acrylate, poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)
           happens relatively fast (in the order of seconds),   acrylate,  gelatin-methacrylate,  and hyaluronan-
           which rapidly confers structural stability  to the   methacrylate [17-19] .  In  addition,  gelation  can  be
           printed  scaffold .  Enzymatic  crosslinking  (i.e.,   triggered by printing a hydrogel-forming polymer
                          [12]
           using transglutaminase [TG]), on the other hand,    solution into a bath of the reactive substance. It was
           takes  place  relatively  slower (in the  order of   reported that alginate printed into calcium solution
           minutes) than photocrosslinking. Although slower,   using this method has yielded complex cell-laden
           TG has been widely used as a meat glue to mediate   3D  structures maintaining  cell viability . DIW
                                                                                                      [20]
           the crosslinking of gelatin; the crosslinked product   of  these  hydrogel-forming  polymers  offers  a

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 4       119
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128