Page 64 - IJB-6-4
P. 64

Applications of 3D bioprinted iPSCs
           factors (Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4) , followed by        cells.  The commonly used bioinks for printing
                                           [7]
           epigenetic remodeling of entire genome and two      iPSC derived cells are hydrogels derived from
           waves of transcriptional  events [8,9] . Each cell   alginate, carboxymethyl chitosan, agarose, nano-
           type  in  the  body  require  different  combinations   fibrillated cellulose, hydroxypropyl chitin, gelatin
           of transcriptional factors to induce the stemness   methacryloyl  (GelMA), and Matrigel.  Most of
           where Oct4 is considered as an indispensable        these hydrogels need a crosslinker to give the
           core pluripotency  gene in the reprogramming        final  structure  of  the  intended  tissue  constructs.
           process . Exogenous supply of Oct4 alone could      Calcium  chloride, ultraviolet  (UV) radiation,
                  [10]
           convert adult neural stem cells into iPSCs. Recent   photo crosslinking, and altered temperatures are
           work  by An  et  al.  showed  that  Sox2 and  Klf4   used for crosslinking the bioink molecules [25-27] .
           were enough to prepare iPSCs from various types       Here, we review  the  applications  of the
           of  somatic  cells . Small  molecules  that  inhibit   3D bioprinted iPSCs or iPSC-derived  cellular
                           [7]
           DNA or histone modifications were also used for     products in healthcare, especially in regenerative
           generating iPSCs more efficiently along with the    medicine,  disease  modeling,  and drug testing
           use of reprogramming  transcription  factors. The   (Figure 1). The methods of reprograming of iPSCs
           hematopoietic stem cells can be de-differentiated   were described.  Glimpses of the  technological
           into  iPSCs  much  more  efficiently  compared      advancement in organ bioprinting were discussed.
           to  the  highly specialized  cells  such as B and  T   The advantages, limitations, and future directions
           lymphocytes [11,12] .                               of using iPSCs in clinics were outlined.
             Fibroblasts are the most popular cell type used
           to  generate  iPSCs.  However,  well-differentiated   2 Human iPSC reprogramming methods
           adult cells such as keratinocytes, neural cells, fat
           cells, melanocytes, amniotic fluid cells, pancreatic   For clinical  application  and disease  modeling,
           beta cells, and peripheral blood derived cells      the reprogramming method of choice should
           had  also been  successfully  reprogrammed  to      have adequate efficiency to produce iPSCs from
                                                                                     [28]
           pluripotent  stem  cells.  The  capacity  to  induce   less abundant samples . Production of iPSCs
           pluripotency  to somatic cells helps to generate    using a combination of reprogramming methods
           pluripotent  patient-specific  cell  lines  that  can   can  augment  the  efficiency  of  iPSCs  generation
                                                                                                            [29]
           help model  human diseases and can aid  in the      even from the most difficult type of adult cells .
           reconstruction  of damaged  tissues and organs.     More than 10 years of extensive research on iPSC
           The  “disease in  a  dish”  models  derived  from   technology  lead  to the establishment  of novel
           IPSCs provide insights into disease pathogenesis    strategies for the production of iPSCs  including
           and can serve as a novel tool for drug evaluation   the use of right cell type for reprogramming, use
           in   precision   medicine   field [13-15] .  Human  of non-integrative  gene  introduction  methods,
           iPSCs  reinforced  with  biocompatible  scaffold    overexpression of gene enhancers of transcription
           materials are valuable in three-dimensional (3D)    factors, and the use of small molecules    [30,31]
           bioprinting  applications . Current bioprinting     (Figure 2).
                                  [16]
           techniques  allow  to  print  undifferentiated  iPSCs   2.1 Integrating viral vectors
           and  iPSC-derived  cells  mixed  with  a  suitable
           bioink [17,18] . Popular bioprinting techniques used   Initial  iPSC experiments  used lentivirus  and
           to print  iPSCs are extrusion,  stereolithography   retrovirus  vectors  to deliver  Yamanaka  factors
           (SLA), laser-assisted, and drop-on-demand           in  adult  fibroblasts [2,32] . These  retroviral-vectors
           bioprinting [19-22] . A single biomaterial or a mixture   possess  the risk of creating mutagenesis  by
           of several biomaterials in the bioink are used to   integrating  to  the  host cell  genetic  material .
                                                                                                            [33]
           suspend the desired cells for bioprinting [23,24] . The   Moreover, the reprogramming procedure is
           bioinks should be non-toxic, biocompatible  and     tedious, also, it can cause chromosomal instability
           should provide structural support for the printed   and potential  threat of tumorigenesis from the

           60                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 4
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69