Page 117 - IJB-10-6

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed bioelectronic devices

48. Remaggi G, Zaccarelli A, Elviri L. 3D printing technologies in printing and ultrasonic cavitation-enabled treatment. Sens
biosensors production: recent developments. Chemosensors. Actuators A: Phys. 2022;340:113526.
2022;10(2):65. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2022.113526
doi: 10.3390/chemosensors10020065
61. Ma C, Zhu B, Qian Z, Ren L, Yuan H, Meng Y. 3D-printing of
49. Huang J, Qin Q, Wang J. A review of stereolithography: conductive inks based flexible tactile sensor for monitoring
processes and systems. Processes. 2020;8(9):1138. of temperature, strain and pressure. J Manuf Processes.
doi: 10.3390/pr8091138 2023;87:1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.008
50. Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, Luo S, Nie J, Zhu X. Photo-curing
3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater. 62. Park SH, Su R, Jeong J, et al. 3D printed polymer
2020;5(1):110-115. photodetectors. Adv Mater. 2018;30(40):1803980.
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003 doi: 10.1002/adma.201803980
51. Song Q, Chen Y, Hou P, et al. Fabrication of multi- 63. Zhu Z, Park HS, McAlpine MC. 3D printed deformable
material pneumatic actuators and microactuators using sensors. Sci Adv. 2020;6(25):eaba5575.
stereolithography. Micromachines. 2023;14(2):244. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba5575
doi: 10.3390/mi14020244 64. Schouten M, Wolterink G, Dijkshoorn A, Kosmas D,
52. Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma Q-P, et al. A review of vat Stramigioli S, Krijnen G. A review of extrusion-based 3d
photopolymerization technology: materials, applications, printing for the fabrication of electro-and biomechanical
challenges, and future trends of 3D printing. Polymers. sensors. IEEE Sens J. 2020;21(11):12900-12912.
2021;13(4):598. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3042436
doi: 10.3390/polym13040598 65. Saadi MASR, Maguire A, Pottackal NT, et al. Direct ink
53. Peng X, Kuang X, Roach DJ, et al. Integrating digital writing: A 3D printing technology for diverse materials.
light processing with direct ink writing for hybrid 3D Adv Mater. 2022;34(28):2108855.
printing of functional structures and devices. Addit Manuf. doi: 10.1002/adma.201707495
2021;40:101911. 66. Wei P, Leng H, Chen Q, Advincula RC, Pentzer EB.
doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101911 Reprocessable 3D-printed conductive elastomeric
54. Liu M, Zhang Q, Shao Y, Liu C, Zhao Y. Research of a novel composite foams for strain and gas sensing. ACS Appl Polym
3D printed strain gauge type force sensor. Micromachines. Mater. 2019;1(4):885-892.
2018;10(1):20. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.9b00118
doi: 10.3390/mi10010020 67. Huang K, Dong S, Yang J, et al. Three-dimensional printing
55. Kim NP, Eo J-S, Cho D. Optimization of piston type of a tunable graphene-based elastomer for strain sensors
extrusion (PTE) techniques for 3D printed food. J Food Eng. with ultrahigh sensitivity. Carbon. 2019;143:63-72.
2018;235:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.04.019 68. Baker DV, Bao C, Kim WS. Highly conductive 3D printable
56. Valkenaers H, Vogeler F, Voet A, Kruth J-P. Screw Extrusion materials for 3D structural electronics. ACS Appl Electron
Based 3D Printing, A Novel Additive Manufacturing Mater. 2021;3(6):2423-2433.
Technology. University of Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch; doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.1c00296
2013:97-103. 69. Neumann TV, Dickey MD. Liquid metal direct write
57. Seoane-Viaño I, Januskaite P, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Basit and 3D printing: a review. Adv Mater Technol. 2020;5(9):
AW, Goyanes A. Semi-solid extrusion 3D printing in 2000070.
drug delivery and biomedicine: personalised solutions for doi: 10.1002/admt.202000070
healthcare challenges. J Control Release. 2021;332:367-389. 70. Tan HW, An J, Chua CK, Tran T. Metallic nanoparticle
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.027 inks for 3D printing of electronics. Adv Electronic Mater.
58. Tetsuka H, Shin SR. Materials and technical innovations in 2019;5(5):1800831.
3D printing in biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B. doi: 10.1002/aelm.201800831
2020;8(15):2930-2950. 71. Zou Z, Chen Y, Yuan S, Luo N, Li J, He Y. 3D printing of
doi: 10.1039/D0TB00034E liquid metals: recent advancements and challenges. Adv
59. Dababneh AB, Ozbolat IT. Bioprinting technology: a current Funct Mater. 2023;33(10):2213312.
state-of-the-art review. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014;136(6):061016. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202213312
doi: 10.1115/1.4028512 72. Chen R. Liquid Metal Based Flexible Pressure Sensor for
Tactile Sensing of Robots. IOP Publishing; 2021:052025.
60. Li B, Liang W, Zhang L, Ren F, Xuan F. TPU/CNTs flexible
strain sensor with auxetic structure via a novel hybrid doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1885/5/052025
manufacturing process of fused deposition modeling 3D 73. Cook A, Parekh DP, Ladd C, et al. Shear‐driven direct‐write

Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024) 109 doi: 10.36922/ijb.4139