Page 115 - IJB-10-6

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed bioelectronic devices

References 12. Bao G, Yang P, Yi J, et al. Full-sized realistic 3D printed
models of liver and tumour anatomy: a useful tool for the
1. Xu L, Qin H, Tan J, et al. Clinical study of 3D printed clinical medicine education of beginning trainees. BMC
personalized prosthesis in the treatment of bone defect after Med Educ. 2023;23(1):574.
pelvic tumor resection. J Orthop Translat. 2021;29:163-169. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04535-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.05.007 13. Fu H, Zhang D, Zeng J, et al. Application of 3D-printed
2. Tejo-Otero A, Lustig-Gainza P, Fenollosa-Artés F, Valls A, tissue-engineered skin substitute using innovative
Krauel L, Buj-Corral I. 3D printed soft surgical planning biomaterial loaded with human adipose-derived stem cells
prototype for a biliary tract rhabdomyosarcoma. J Mech in wound healing. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(2):674.
Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;109:103844. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.674
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103844 14. Zhu Z, Guo SZ, Hirdler T, et al. 3D printed functional and
3. Uhl JF, Sufianov A, Ruiz C, et al. The use of 3D printed models biological materials on moving freeform surfaces. Adv
for surgical simulation of cranioplasty in craniosynostosis as Mater. 2018;30(23):e1707495.
training and education. Brain Sci. 2023;13(6):894. doi: 10.1002/adma.201707495
doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060894 15. Guo X, Li H, Hong W, et al. 3D printed fourth-order star-like
4. Wang F, Xue Y, Chen X, et al. 3D printed implantable negative poisson’s ratio structure for high-sensitivity bionic
hydrogel bioelectronics for electrophysiological flexible capacitive pressure sensor. IEEE Sens J. 2024;24(9)
monitoring and electrical modulation. Adv Funct Mater. 13937-13945.
2024;34(21):2314471. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3374304
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202314471
16. He Q, Zeng Y, Jiang L, et al. Growing recyclable and
5. Krishnadoss V, Kanjilal B, Hesketh A, et al. In situ 3D healable piezoelectric composites in 3D printed bioinspired
printing of implantable energy storage devices. Chem Eng J. structure for protective wearable sensor. Nat Commun.
2021;409:128213. 2023;14(1):6477.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128213 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41740-6
6. Picco CJ, Domínguez-Robles J, Utomo E, et al. 3D-printed 17. Wei J, Xie J, Zhang P, et al. Bioinspired 3D printable,
implantable devices with biodegradable rate-controlling self-healable, and stretchable hydrogels with multiple
membrane for sustained delivery of hydrophobic drugs. conductivities for skin-like wearable strain sensors. ACS
Drug Deliv. 2022;29(1):1038-1048. Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(2):2952-2960.
doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2057620 doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c19512
7. Yi Q, Najafikhoshnoo S, Das P, et al. All‐3D‐printed, flexible, 18. Jain K, Wang Z, Garma LD, et al. 3D printable composites
and hybrid wearable bioelectronic tactile sensors using of modified cellulose fibers and conductive polymers
biocompatible nanocomposites for health monitoring. Adv and their use in wearable electronics. Appl Mater Today.
Mater Technol. 2022;7(5):2101034. 2023;30:101703.
doi: 10.1002/admt.202101034 doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101703
8. Tang Z, Jia S, Zhou C, Li B. 3D printing of highly sensitive 19. Yu J, Tian F, Wang W, et al. Design of highly conductive,
and large-measurement-range flexible pressure sensors with intrinsically stretchable, and 3D printable PEDOT: PSS
a positive piezoresistive effect. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. hydrogels via PSS-chain engineering for bioelectronics.
2020;12(25):28669-28680. Chem Mater. 2023;35(15):5936-5944.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c06977 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c00844
9. Davoodi E, Montazerian H, Haghniaz R, et al. 3D-printed 20. Peng S, Li Y, Wu L, et al. 3D printing mechanically robust
ultra-robust surface-doped porous silicone sensors for and transparent polyurethane elastomers for stretchable
wearable biomonitoring. ACS Nano. 2020;14(2):1520-1532. electronic sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b06283 12(5):6479-6488
doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b20631
10. Kwon Y-T, Kim Y-S, Kwon S, et al. All-printed nanomembrane
wireless bioelectronics using a biocompatible solderable 21. Tan P, Xi Y, Chao S, et al. An artificial intelligence-enhanced
graphene for multimodal human-machine interfaces. Nat blood pressure monitor wristband based on piezoelectric
Commun. 2020;11(1):3450. nanogenerator. Biosensors. 2022;12(4):234.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17288-0 doi: 10.3390/bios12040234
11. Yan W-C, Davoodi P, Vijayavenkataraman S, et al. 3D 22. Kim B, Jang S, Geier ML, Prabhumirashi PL, Hersam
bioprinting of skin tissue: from pre-processing to final MC, Dodabalapur A. High-speed, inkjet-printed carbon
product evaluation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132: nanotube/zinc tin oxide hybrid complementary ring
270-295. oscillators. Nano Lett. 2014;14(6):3683-3687.
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.016 doi: 10.1021/nl5016014

Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024) 107 doi: 10.36922/ijb.4139