Page 260 - IJB-10-6
P. 260

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  3D-printed contractive pennate muscle




                                   a
                          F =  3 EI γ ()                (I)    pennate muscle model provides greater contraction force
                                 z
                                a 3                            compared to the parallel muscle model under the same
                                                               deformation, demonstrating the superior properties of the
               where  F is the contraction force,  E is the Young’s   pennate muscle structure.
            modulus,  I  is the second moment of area of the post   3.2. Morphology analysis of the engineered
                     Z
            around the z-axis, a is the height at which tissue is pulling   muscle tissues
            from the post, and γ(a) is the displacement of the post at   The macroscopic shape of the 3D-printed muscle tissues is
            that height.                                       displayed in Figure 5D, and its dimension was measured

            2.10. Statistical analysis                         and analyzed accordingly (Figure 5E); the long axis was
            All experimental results were processed and plotted using   12.18 ± 0.06 mm, and the major diameter was 4.37 ±
            Origin software (OriginPro 2021; OriginLab Corporation,   0.03 mm (n = 6). Compared to the designed dimensions
            USA). The data are expressed as mean ± standard    in Figure 4, the fabrication error of the long axis is about
            deviation. Statistical analysis was performed via one-way   1.52%, while that of the major diameter reaches 9.33%.
            analysis of variance (ANOVA), and p < 0.05 was considered   To accurately measure the width of the microchannels
            statistically significant (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).  in the engineered tissues, we printed a separate layer of
                                                               microchannels  from  the  layer-by-layer  printing  process.
            3. Results                                         Figure 6A displays the microchannel size in the muscle
                                                               tissues observed under an inverted microscope; the average
            3.1. Structural design of the engineered tissue after   measured  width  was  284.28  ±  14.40  μm  (n  =  3).  There
            optimization                                       was no significant difference between the measured and
            The in vitro skeletal muscle in our study should possess   designed values of the width of the printed microchannels
            macro and microstructures similar to the gastrocnemius   (Figure 6B), indicating that they meet the requirements for
            muscle of frogs. Based on our observations and     nutrient transport and cell survival.
            measurements  of  the  gastrocnemius  muscle,  as  well  as
            our production capability, specific tissue dimensions were   3.3. Cell status analysis
            selected (i.e., L: 12 mm, R: 4 mm, r: 2 mm, and pennate   Live/dead staining was performed on sliced tissues on
            angle:  15°;  Figure  3).  Simultaneously,  we  conducted   days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after printing. Figure 6C demonstrates a
            simulation experiments on  models with different  macro   steady increase in cell viability over time, reaching 79.89%
            and  microparameters,  demonstrating  the  rationality  of   on day 7 after printing. Under electrical stimulation in
            our  parameter  selection  (Figures  S1  and  S2,  Supporting   DM, the skeletal muscle cells would differentiate into
            Information). The simulation results on the deformation   muscle fibers that are essential for the functionalization of
            distribution of the model revealed that maximum    muscle tissues. Myotube alignment was compared between
            deformation occurred at the end face, where the contractile   the pennate and parallel muscle tissues under different
            force was exerted (Figure 4B). This phenomenon is   printing parameters (printing speed: 6, 8, and 10 mm/s;
            consistent with the characteristics of compression   air pressure: 2, 3,  and 4 kPa).  The differentiation status
            deformation. However, in the actual contraction process of   was observed via fluorescence staining of the cytoskeleton
            the muscle tissues, the deformation distribution should be   (Figure 6D), and the angle of the nucleus was calculated to
            more uniform than the simulation results, as the muscle   assess the degree of cell alignment. Figure 6E displays the
            fibers are evenly distributed inside.              frequency distribution of cell nucleus angles (S: printing
                                                               speed [mm/s]; P: air pressure [kPa]; cell orientation rate:
               Furthermore, simulations were conducted to compare   S6P2: 44.74%, S8P2: 45.87%, S10P2: 51.93%, S6P3: 41.04%,
            the  deformation  performance  of  the designed  pennate   S6P4: 45.22%). We noticed that the cell orientation rate
            tissue model with that of the parallel muscle model, both   increased with higher printing speed, while no significant
            with  the  same  macro  geometry.  In  Figure  4B,  results   correlation was established between air pressure and cell
            indicate no  significant difference  in  the  deformation   orientation rate. The highest orientation rate was 51.93%,
            displacement  between  the  two  muscle  configurations   obtained at a printing speed of 10 mm/s and an air pressure
            under the same contraction force. The simulation results   of 2 kPa.
            displayed an average deformation strain of 0.1308 for
            the pennate muscle. In contrast, the average strain of the   3.4. Contraction performance of muscle tissues
            parallel muscle model was 0.1334. As a result, the pennate   Contraction performance was evaluated based on the
            muscle  model  exhibited an  average  deformation  that   contraction displacement and force. The test platform was
            was 1.95% lower compared to the parallel muscle model.   constructed (Figure 7A), and the contraction displacement
            Based on the simulation results, it can be inferred that the   was first measured without any load. The configuration of

            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       252                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4371
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265