Page 262 - IJB-10-6
P. 262

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  3D-printed contractive pennate muscle




























































            Figure 7. Evaluation of contraction displacement of muscle tissues. (A) Electrical stimulation platform. (B) Schematic diagram of the measurement
            method for contraction displacement of tissues. (C and D) Contraction of tissues under an impulse electric field formed between two electrodes and
            recorded by a microscope. Grid size: 1mm. (E and F) Contraction displacement of pennate and parallel muscle tissues under different (E) electrical fields
            and (F) frequencies (n = 3). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

            (Figure 8E), our study demonstrates advantages in both   well as complex 3D microstructure, and the cells inside the
            volume and contraction force.                      tissues were induced to differentiate under the electrical
                                                               field to attain high cell viability (79.89%) and alignment of
            4. Discussion                                      muscle fibers (51.93%). The pennate tissues could achieve

            In our study, we designed and manufactured engineered   a maximum contraction displacement of 24.64 μm and a
            skeletal muscle tissues with a macroscopic shape simulating   contractile force of 443.085 μN. The structural design and
            the  gastrocnemius  muscle, with  an internal  15°  pennate   manufacturing scheme of the engineered muscle tissues
            angle of muscle fiber arrangement, using 3D bioprinting   that mimic the gastrocnemius muscle proposed in this
            technology. The manufacturing process could effectively   study could provide new ideas and methods for establishing
            achieve uniform distribution of cells within the tissue, as   a modular and highly contractile muscle construct.


            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       254                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4371
   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267