Page 111 - IJB-7-1
P. 111

Zheng, et al.
           A                                               B























                        C









           Figure 5. (A) Western blot analyses of osteogenic proteins after knockdown of HSPA5 in C3H10 cells (Si-HSPA5) and after treatment with
           two concentrations of leaching solution from β-tricalcium phosphate/poly (Lactic-co-glycolic acid)/HA15 scaffolds (HA15-1, HA15-2) in
           stimulated osteogenic medium for 7 days. (B) mRNA expression of osteogenic genes after knockdown of HSPA5, treatment with HA15-1
           or HA15-2 in C3H10 cells and being stimulated by osteogenic medium for 7 days. (C) Alizarin red S staining of C3H10 cells with HSPA5
           knockdown and treatment with HA15-1 or HA15-2 in osteogenic medium for 14 days.

           3.5. Immunofluorescence staining                    Table  2.  Compression  mechanical  results  of  β-TCP/PLGA  and
                                                               β-TCP/PLGA/HA15 scaffolds
           The OCN protein, DAPI, and HSPA5 were stained using
                                                                               Young
           immunofluorescence  method  and  the  co-localization   Scaffold  modulus (E)    Ultimate     Strain
                                                                                             tensile
           of  them  was  observed  using  confocal  laser  scanning                      strength (UTS)
           microscope. The OCN proteins were marked by green
           fluorescence,  HSPA5  by  red  color,  and  the  nucleus   β-TCP/PLGA  27.86     0.366 MPa    1.28%
           labeled  by  DAPI  as  blue  color. After  merging  all  the   β-TCP/  31.36     0.443 MPa     8.6%
           immunofluorescence  figures,  it  can  be  seen  that  OCN   PLGA/HA15
           and HSPA5 were co-localized in cytoplasm and nucleus
           (Figure  6).  Significantly  stronger  OCN  staining  was   β-TCP/PLGA and β-TCP/PLGA/HA15 samples were
           observed  in  the  HA15  sample  in  comparison  to  the   about 0.366 MPa and 0.443 MPa, respectively. It can
           control, indicating a better osteogenic effect. Contrarily,   be seen that the compression strength of the β-TCP/
           the  amount  of  HSPA5  was  considerably  decreased  in   PLGA/HA15 scaffold is 19% higher than that of the
           the HA15 sample compared to the control. Thus, HA15   β-TCP/PLGA  and  is  considered  more  suitable  for
           has  the  potential  to  improve  osteogenesis  and  reduce   load-bearing  applications,  especially  bone  defects.
                                                               Although  β-TCP/PLGA  has  less  Young’s  modulus
           HSAP5.
                                                               and can inhibit stress shielding effect, this amount in
           3.6. Mechanical properties                          β-TCP/PLGA/HA15  is  not  considerably  high  and  it
                                                               can still maintain good biomechanical properties. The
           The mechanical compression performance of β-TCP/    compression  strength  and  Young’s  modulus  of  these
           PLGA  and  β-TCP/PLGA/HA15  samples  is  listed  in   samples are comparable with those of cancellous bone
           Table  2  and  their  respective  stress-strain  curves  are   tissue [42,43] ; hence, they seem to be suitable for bone
           illustrated in Figure 7. The compression strengths of   defect  applications.  Nonetheless,  the  performance  of



                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 1       107
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116