Page 109 - IJB-7-1
P. 109

Zheng, et al.
           Table 1. Primer sequences of osteogenic genes
           Osteogenic genes                             Primer sequences
           HSPA5                                       F: 5’-CACGGTCTTTGACGCCAAG-3’
                                                       R: 5’-CCAAATAAGCCTCAGCGGTTT-3’
           ALP                                         F: 5’-CGGATCCTGACCAAAAACC-3’
                                                       R: 5’-TCATGATGTCCGTGGTCAAT-3’
           BMP2                                        F: 5’-GAATGACTGGATCGTGGCACCTC-3’
                                                       R: 5’-GGCATGGTTAGTGGAGTTCAGGTG-3’
           Col1α1                                      F: 5’-CATGTTCAGCTTTGTGGACCT-3’
                                                       R: 5’-GCAGCTGACTTCAGGGATGT-3’
           OCN                                         F: 5’-CACCATGAGGACCCTCTCTC-3’
                                                       R: 5’-TGGACATGAAGGCTTTGTCA-3’
           Osterix                                     F: 5’-TCTCCATCTGCCTGACTCCT-3’
                                                       R: 5’-AGCGTATGGCTTCTTTGTGC-3’
           Runx2                                       F: 5’-GACTGTGGTTACCGTCATGGC-3’
                                                       R: 5’-ACTTGGTTTTTCATAACAGCGGA-3’
           GAPDH                                       F: 5’-CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC-3’
                                                       R: 5’-CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT-3’
           F, forward; R, reverse; BMP2, bone morphogenetic protein 2; ALP, alkaline phosphate; col1a1, collagen type I; OCN; osteocalcin.

           A                        B                        C                       D













           Figure 3. Surgery process on rabbit model. (A) Ear intravenous injection for anesthesia; (B) radius of the forearm in the middle and upper
           segment of the forearm; (C) sample implantation; (D) stitched wound.

           pump was turned on and irrigated with saline until no red   3. Results and discussion
           liquid flows out, and then it was changed to 4% PFA.
             After  the  muscle  tissue  was  fixed,  the  perfusion  of   3.1. Characterizations of scaffolds
           40-50 ml of mixed microfil liquid (solvent: solute=4:5,   The  pore  structure  of  the  3D-printed  scaffolds  was
           1–2%  coagulant  added)  was  started.  At  the  end  of
           the  perfusion  process,  the  small  blood  vessels  of  the   evaluated  using  SEM.  Figure  4  shows  the  SEM
           mesentery  appeared  yellow.  Then,  the  rabbit  corpse   micrographs  of  β-TCP/PLGA  and  β-TCP/PLGA/
           was  placed  in  a  4°C  refrigerator  overnight. After  the   HA15 scaffolds. Both samples have 3D interconnected
           contrast  agent  was  fixed,  the  rabbit  upper  limb  was   macropores  with  an  acceptable  shape  tolerance  and
                                                                        [36]
           extracted  to  implement  a  micro-CT  scan  and  observe   uniformity .  It  can  be  observed  that  the  number  of
           the angiography.                                    distortions and defects is negligible and the 3D printing
                                                               process has a good capability to produce this type of layer-
           2.6. Statistical analysis                           by-layer β-TCP/PLGA scaffolds. The red dotted circles
           The obtained results were expressed as mean ± SD. All   in Figure 3 shows the near perfect pore morphologies.
           the  quantitative  data  were  obtained  from  three  or  four   Also, the pores have rectangular shapes but are of varying
           independent  experiments.  The  statistical  analysis  was   sizes. The bigger pores have dimensions of about 200 μm
           performed using one-way analysis of variance followed   ×180 μm while the smaller ones have dimensions in the
           by post-hoc tests. A value of P < 0.05 was regarded as   range of ~100 μm × ~180 μm. This perfect pore structure
           significant.                                        maintains a large number of adhesion areas for cells.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 1       105
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114