Page 125 - IJB-7-3
P. 125

Li, et al.
           4. Conclusions                                          Avenue for Manufacturing Tissues and Organs. Engineering,

           This study established a quantitative approach to evaluate a   5:777–94.
           sodium alginate’s printability–gelatin composite hydrogel      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.03.009.
           using  linewidth  as  a  criterion.  A  quantitative  thermal   3.   He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, et al., 2016, Research on the Printability
           model  was presented  to  facilitate  precise  temperature   of Hydrogels in 3D Bioprinting. Sci Rep, 6:29977.
           control with consideration of the syringe temperature, AT,   4.   Michal S, Smadar C, 2003, Cardiac Tissue Engineering, Ex
           and dispensing material temperature. A physical model   Vivo:  Design  Principles  in  Biomaterials  and  Bioreactors.
           was established that described the relationship between   Heart Fail Rev, 8:271–6.
           the temperature-sensitive indices, dispensing pressure,
           velocity, and linewidth. Subsequently, it was used to guide   5.   Campbell J, McGuinness I, Wirz H, et al., 2015, Multimaterial
           the  accurate  printing  of lines with  a 50-μm linewidth   and Multiscale Three-Dimensional Bioprinter. J Nanotechnol
           step. The cell-laden printing test results verified that cell   Eng Med, 6:021005.
           viability in the gelatin–alginate temperature zone was not   6.   Holländer J, Hakala R, Suominen J, et al., 2018, 3D Printed
           violated significantly by the printing process. Based on   UV  Light  Cured  Polydimethylsiloxane  Devices  for  Drug
           the proposed physical model, an open-loop control can   Delivery. Int J Pharm, 544:433–42.
           be established to improve  printability  and expand the      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.016.
           potential application of extrusion-based bioprinting.
                                                               7.   Kang  HW,  Lee  SJ,  Ko  IK,  et  al., 2016, A 3D Bioprinting
           Acknowledgments                                         System  to  Produce  Human-Scale  Tissue Constructs  with

           We  would  like  to  thank  the  support  by  National   Structural Integrity. Nat Biotechnol, 34:312–9.
           Key  Research  and  Development  Program  of  China      https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413.
           (2018YFA0703000),  Key  Research  and  Development   8.   Liu  W,  Zhang  YS,  Heinrich  MA,  et  al., 2017, Rapid
           Projects of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2017C01054),   Continuous Multimaterial Extrusion Bioprinting. Adv Mater,
           National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (Grant   29:1604630.
           No.  51875518,  No.51821093),  and  the  Fundamental   9.   McElheny  C,  Hayes  D,  Devireddy  R,  2017,  Design  and
           Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant      Fabrication  of  a  Low-Cost  Three-Dimensional  Bioprinter.
           No. 2019XZZX003-02, 2020QNA4001).
                                                                   J Med Device, 11:041001.
           Conflict of interest                                    https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037259.

           There are no conflicts of interest to declare.      10.  Wang  L,  Xu  ME,  Luo  L,  et  al.,  2018,  Iterative  Feedback
                                                                   Bio-Printing-Derived  Cell-Laden  Hydrogel  Scaffolds  with
           Author contributions                                    Optimal  Geometrical  Fidelity  and  Cellular  Controllability.

           L.Q.: Experimental conception and design, acquisition of   Sci Rep, 8:2802.
           data, analysis and interpretation of data, paper drafting      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21274-4.
           and  revising;  Z.B.:  Experimental  conception  and   11.  Ahn  G,  Park  JH,  Kang  T,  et al.,  2010,  Effect  of  Pore
           design, paper drafting, and revising; X.Q: Experimental   Architecture on Oxygen Diffusion in 3D Scaffolds for Tissue
           conception and design; Z.C.X.: Experimental conception   Engineering. J Biomech Eng, 132:104506.
           and  design;  L.Y.C.:  Experimental  conception  and   12.  Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print Me An Organ! Why
           design; Z.H.Z.: Supervise the work, paper drafting and
           revising,  and  final  approval  of  paper;  M.L.:  Supervise   We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145.
           the work, financial support, paper drafting and revising,      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145.
           and  final  approval  of  paper; Y.H.Y.:  Financial  support,   13.  Nguyen  DG,  Funk  J,  Robbins  JB,  et  al., 2016, Bioprinted
           administrative  support,  and  final  approval  of  paper;   3D Primary Liver Tissues Allow Assessment of Organ-Level
           B.D.P.: Experimental conception and design.             Response to Clinical Drug Induced Toxicity In Vitro. PLoS
           References                                              One, 11:e0158674.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158674.
           1.   Donderwinkel I, Hest JC, Cameron NR, 2017, Bio-inks for   14.  Park  SJ,  Kim  RY,  Park  BW,  et al.,  2019,  Dual  Stem  Cell
               3D  Bioprinting:  Recent  Advances  and  Future  Prospects.   Therapy  Synergistically  Improves  Cardiac  Function  And
               Polym Chem, 8:4451–71.                              Vascular Regeneration Following Myocardial Infarction. Nat
               https://doi.org/10.1039/c7py00826k.                 Commun, 10:3123.
           2.   Zhang B, Gao L, Ma L, et al., 2019, 3D Bioprinting: A Novel      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11091-2.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3       121
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130