Page 187 - IJB-8-1
P. 187

Yao, et al.


                         Original        CellProfiler        Squassh         CycleGAN            AD-GAN




              8 µm









             24 µm









             40 µm






           Figure 6. Comparison of segmentation performance from Squassh, Cellprofiler, CycleGAN and AD-GAN under low cell density when
           culturing at day 1 using A549. Grayscale CLSM images with low cell density collected from different depths of the volume are shown in the
           first column. Segmentation results from the four methods are shown in column. Different colors are used to discriminate individual nuclei.

           could not identify nuclei along the fiber edge at the depth   A             B
           of 24 µm. Indeed, the existence of fibers had significantly
           lowered the nuclei segmentation performance. CycleGAN
           tended to learn one-to-one mapping at image-level instead
           of  object-level.  Consequently,  nuclei  addition/deletion,
           position offset and unmatched shape could be widely found
           in its segmentation results as shown in Figure S4 and the
           fourth column in Figure 6.
               Compared with the grayscale image in Figure S1,
           the proposed AD-GAN could retrieve most of the nuclei   Figure 7. (A and B) Confocal laser scanning microscopy image and
           with the correct positions and shapes. It also outperformd   3D nuclei segmentation under higher cell density when culturing at
           when identifying multiple nuclei shapes within an image,   day 3 using A549.
           which are difficult to define using mathematical models.
                                                               very small amount of nuclei was captured at the depth
           (2) Comparison of performance under high cell density
                                                               of 40 µm. The segmented nuclei in (Figure 7B) looked
           With  the  increase  of  cell  culture  time,  cells  migrate,   visually close to those in Figure S5. Moreover, AD-GAN
           proliferate  and  form  some  kind  of  sheet  or  circular   could identify multiple nuclei which are spatially close
           structure within the cavity of the scaffolds, indicating an   in  dense  cell  regions.  The  corresponding  segmentation
           improved cell-scaffold interaction. The 3D CLSM image   results  from  CellProfiler,  Squassh  and  CycleGAN  are
           under high cell density is shown in (Figure 7A) and its   shown in Figure S6-S8.
           grayscale image is shown in Figure S5. Under higher cell   Different  from  the  results  under  low  cell  density,
           densities, the outputs of the AD-GAN model with volume   Cellprofiler identified some portion of fibers as nuclei at
           renderings are shown in (Figure 7B). Their 2D slices at   the depth of 8 µm and 24 µm under high cell density.
           the depth of 8 µm, 24 µm and 40 µm below the surface   The segmentation results became even worse when using
           of the scaffold are shown in the first column of Figure 8.   Squassh. A large portion of straight fibers were identified
           Similar  to  the  situation  under  low  cell  density,  only  a   as  nuclei  indicated  by  blue  curves.  On  the  other  hand,

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1       173
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192