Page 41 - IJB-8-1
P. 41

Ng, et al.
           cell-laden droplets at nanoliter droplets with high cell   (0 – 5 million cells/mL). In general, the cell-laden bio-
           viability. The cell-laden droplets were printed at 1 kHz   inks  can  be  categorized  into  3  distinct  classifications
           frequency  into  tissue-treated  12-well  plates  to  obtain  8   based on the cell volume fraction ɸ : dilute bio-inks (ɸ
                                                                                             [41]
           × 8 array of droplets (varying total dispensed volume of   ≤ 2%), semi-dilute bio-inks (ɸ ≤ 25%), and concentrated
           20, 30, and 40 nL per droplet position). The total printing   bio-inks  (ɸ  > 25%).  The cell diameter of the HDFs is
           time for each study was limited to <1 min, and the time   ~18.2 ± 1.6  µm, and the cell volume fractions of the
           taken  for  this  evaporation  study  was  measured  at  the   cell-laden  bio-inks  (1  –  5  million  cells/mL)  used  in
           start of printing. The viability of printed arrays of cell-  this study were 0.337%, 0.674%, 1.011%, 1.348%, and
           laden droplets  (20  nL,  30  nL  and 40  nL  per  spot)  was   1.685%,  respectively.  Hence,  the  cell-laden  bio-inks
           evaluated by adding the Live/Dead Viability/Cytotoxicity   used  in  this  study  are  considered  dilute  bio-inks.  The
           kits  (Invitrogen™  L3224,  Thermo  Fisher  Scientific)   rheological measurement demonstrates an increasing
           at different time intervals (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 min) post-  shear rate that results in lower average viscosity, and the
           printing and incubating the staining solution for 10 min   decrease in bio-ink viscosities for all the cell-laden bio-
           before  fluorescence  imaging.  The  stained  green  cells   inks  (0  –  5  million  cells/mL)  becomes  less  significant
           represent viable printed cells, whereas the stained red   at higher shear rates (> 10  s ) (Figure 1). Hence, the
                                                                                        −1
                                                                                      3
           cells represent dead printed cells. The average printed cell   measured average viscosity values at shear rate of 10  s −1
                                                                                                           4
           viability (%) is obtained by calculating the ratio of viable   would be representative of the shear rate experienced by
           green cells to dead red cells inside each printed droplet for   the cells during the printing process which is estimated
           varying droplet volumes (20, 30, and 40 nL) at different   to be > 10  s . An increase in cell concentration of the
                                                                        4
                                                                          −1
           time intervals (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min) post-printing.  bio-inks  resulted  in  higher  average  viscosity  values
                                                               from 0.687 mPa.s (0 million cells/mL) to 0.868 mPa.s
           2.7. Long-term printed cell proliferation study     (5 million cells/mL). The presence of suspended cells led
           The next important step was to demonstrate the long-term   to higher energy dissipation due to increased frictional
           proliferation profile of the printed cells. The primary HDF   force and distorted flow field experienced at the ink-cell
           cells were printed using optimal printing cell concentration   interface during the printing process. Hence, an increase in
           and printing duration and cultured over a period of 7 days   cell concentration results in higher bio-ink viscosities and
           inside an incubator. For the long-term proliferation study,   this observation is corroborated by earlier studies [42,43] . The
           the PrestoBlue  assay was used to measure the proliferation   measured surface tension of cell-laden bio-inks generally
                       ®
           profile of printed cells based on the normalized relative   decreases with increasing cell concentration; the surface
           fluorescence units (RFUs) over a period of 7 days (day 1,   tension decreases from 72.12 ± 0.47 for 0 million cells/
           3 and 7) post-printing. Fresh culture medium was added to   mL to 62.86 ± 1.00 for 5 million cells/mL. The increase in
           cells before the addition of the PrestoBlue  assay (10% of   cell concentration leads to lower total free energy due to
                                             ®
           the total volume) in the ratio of 9:1, followed by incubation   higher cell adsorption at the liquid-gas interface. Hence,
           at 37°C for 2 h. A micro-plate reader was then used to excite   the overall surface tension decreases with increasing cell
           the PrestoBlue  assay at 560 nm wavelength and measure   concentration and this phenomenon is consistent with
                       ®
           its  fluorescence  emission  at  590  nm  wavelength.  The   other prior works on particle-laden suspension [42-44] . The
           measured fluorescence units for the different fluorescence   density of the 1× PBS solution is 1006.6 ± 2.2 kg/m and
                                                                                                          3
           measurements were then normalized to the control group on
           day 1 to obtain the normalized RFUs for easy comparison.

           2.8. Statistical analysis
           All experimental results were presented as mean ± standard
           deviation. Statistical comparisons were performed using
           Student’s  t-test.  Values  are  significantly  different  when
           P < 0.01. Significance levels are as follows: P < 0.001
           (***) as the most significant and P < 0.01 (*) as the least
           significant.
           3. Results and discussion

           3.1. Characterization of bio-inks                   Figure  1.  Influence  of  cell  concentration  on  bio-ink  properties.
           The  cell-laden  bio-inks  were  prepared  by  mixing  the   Characterization  includes  measurement  of  viscosity,  surface
                                                               tension,  and  density  with  a  sample  size  of  5.  Rheological
           primary HDFs directly with 1× PBS solution to obtain   characterization of cell-laden bio-inks ranging from 0 to 5 million
           cell-laden  bio-inks  of  varying  cell  concentrations   cells/mL from shear rate of 100 to 10,000 s .
                                                                                              −1
                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1        27
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46