Page 52 - IJB-8-1
P. 52

Controlling Droplet Impact Velocity and Droplet Volume Improves Cell Viability in Droplet-Based Bioprinting
           droplet volume of 20 nL per spot and total printing duration   Organoid Construction-are Biomaterials Dispensable? Trends
           of 2  min for each printed layer are recommended for    Biotechnol, 34:711–21.
           maintaining a high cell viability of > 90%. The generated      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.015
           results from this work using cell-laden PBS droplets serve   6.   Gruene M, Pflaum M, Hess C, et al., 2011, Laser Printing of
           as a baseline for other droplet-based bioprinting techniques   Three-dimensional Multicellular Arrays for Studies of Cell-
           that  involve  contactless  jetting  of  nano-liter  cell-laden
           droplets across a nozzle-substrate distance. The ability to   Cell and Cell-Environment Interactions. Tissue Eng Part C
           maintain high cell viability and proliferation rate of the   Methods, 17:973–82.
           printed cells by controlling the droplet impact velocity      https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0185
           and droplet evaporation is useful for various bioprinting   7.   Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Hydrogels for 3-D
           applications, such as fundamental studies of cell-cell or   Bioprinting-based Tissue Engineering. In: Narayan R, editor.
           cell-matrix interactions and fabrication of in-vitro tissue   Rapid Prototyping of Biomaterials. Chapel Hill, NC: Elsevier,
           models through precise patterning of cell-laden droplets
           at the pre-defined positions within the 3D tissue models.  p183-204.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102663-2.00008-3
           Acknowledgments                                     8.   Kathawala  MH, Ng  WL,  Liu  D,  et  al., 2019, Healing  of
           This study is supported under the RIE2020 Industry      Chronic  Wounds an Update of Recent  Developments  and
           Alignment Fund – Industry Collaboration Projects (IAF-  Future Possibilities. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 25:429–44.
           ICP)  Funding  Initiative,  as  well  as  cash  and  in-kind      https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2019.0019
           contribution from the industry partner, HP Inc., through   9.   Rose JC, De Laporte L, 2018, Hierarchical Design of Tissue
           the HP-NTU Digital Manufacturing Corporate Lab. We      Regenerative Constructs. Adv Healthc Mater, 7:1701067.
           would also like to acknowledge and thank the D300e HP      https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701067
           team for supplying the C8 cell-dispensing cassettes for
           the experiments and Professor Zhou Kun’s group for the   10.  Ng WL,  Goh  MH,  Yeong WY,  et al,  2018, Applying
           use of their rheometer.                                 Macromolecular Crowding to 3D Bioprinting: Fabrication of
                                                                   3D Hierarchical Porous Collagen-based Hydrogel Constructs.
           Conflict of interest                                    Biomater Sci, 6:562–74.

           The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.     https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm01015j
                                                               11.  Lee JM,  Suen SK,  Ng  WL,  et al., 2020, Bioprinting of
           Author contributions                                    Collagen:  Considerations,  Potentials, and  Applications.

           The  manuscript  was written  through  contributions  of   Macromol Biosci, 21:2000280.
           all authors. All authors have given approval to the final      https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202000280
           version of the manuscript.                          12.  Osidak EO, Kozhukhov VI, Osidak MS, et al., 2020, Collagen

           References                                              as Bioink for Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review. Int J
                                                                   Bioprint, 6:270.
           1.   Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print Me An Organ! Why      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i3.270
               We Are Not There Yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97:101145.  13.  Ng WL,  Ayi TC,  Liu  YC,  et al., 2021, Fabrication  and
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145  Characterization  of  3D  Bioprinted  Triple-layered  Human
           2.   Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and   Alveolar Lung Models. Int J Bioprint, 7:332.
               Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.                  https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i2.332
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958                14.  Lee JM,  Sing SL,  Tan EY,  et al., 2016, Bioprinting in
           3.   Lee JM, Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, Resolution and Shape   Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering: A Review. Int J Bioprint,
               in  Bioprinting:  Strategizing  Towards  Complex  Tissue  and   2:136–45.
               Organ Printing. Appl Phys Rev, 6:011307.            https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2016.02.006
               https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053909               15.  Saunders RE, Derby B, 2014, Inkjet Printing Biomaterials for
           4.   Ng WL, Chan A, Ong YS, et al., 2020, Deep Learning for   Tissue Engineering: Bioprinting. Int Mater Rev, 59:430–48.
               Fabrication  and Maturation  of 3D Bioprinted  Tissues and      https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280414y.0000000040
               Organs. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 15:340–58.       16.  Ng WL, Lee JM, Yeong WY, et al., 2017, Microvalve-based
               https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1771741       Bioprinting  Process,  Bio-inks  and  Applications.  Biomater
           5.   Wan  AC, 2016, Recapitulating Cell-Cell  Interactions  for   Sci, 5:632–47.

           38                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57