Page 53 - IJB-8-1
P. 53

Ng, et al.
               https://doi.org/10.1039/c6bm00861e                  based Bioprinting-process, Materials,  Applications and
           17.  Ng  WL,  Yeong  WY, Naing  MW,  2016, Microvalve   Regulatory Challenges. Biofabrication, 12:022001.
               Bioprinting of Cellular Droplets with High Resolution and      https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
               Consistency. Proceedings of the International Conference on   28.  Li  W, Mille LS, Robledo JA,  et al., 2020, Recent  Advances
               Progress in Additive Manufacturing, p397–402.       in  Formulating  and  Processing  Biomaterial  Inks  for  Vat
           18.  Koch L, Brandt O, Deiwick A, et al., 2017, Laser Assisted   Polymerization-Based 3D Printing. Adv Healthc Mater, 9:2000156.
               Bioprinting  at  Different  Wavelengths  and  Pulse  Durations      https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156
               with a Metal Dynamic Release Layer: Aa Parametric Study.   29.  Nieto D, Corrales JA, de Mora AJ, et al., 2020, Fundamentals
               Int J Bioprint, 3:42–53.                            of  Light-Cell-Polymer  Interactions  in  Photo-cross-linking
               https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2017.01.001            Based Bioprinting. APL Bioeng, 4:041502.
           19.  Guo F, Li P, French JB, et al., 2015, Controlling Cell-Cell      https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0022693
               Interactions Using Surface Acoustic Waves. Proc Natl Acad   30.  Gudupati  H,  Dey  M,  Ozbolat  I,  2016,  A  Comprehensive
               Sci U S A, 112:43–8.                                Review on Droplet-based Bioprinting: Past, Present and
               https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422068112             Future. Biomaterials, 102:20–42.
           20.  Choe  YE, Kim GH, 2020,  A PCL/Cellulose  Coil-shaped      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.012
               Scaffold  Via  a  Modified  Electrohydrodynamic  Jetting   31.  Ng WL, Tan ZQ, Yeong WY, et al., 2018, Proof-of-concept:
               Process. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 15:403–16.          3D  Bioprinting  of  Pigmented  Human  Skin  Constructs.
               https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1808269       Biofabrication, 10:025005.
           21.  Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future      https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9e1e
               Perspectives in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting.  Biomaterials,   32.  Ng WL, Wang S, Yeong WY, et al., 2016, Skin Bioprinting:
               76:321–43.                                          Impending Reality or Fantasy? Trends Biotechnol, 34:689–99.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.006
           22.  Ng  WL,  Yeong  WY, Naing MW, 2016, Development   33.  Ng WL, Yeong WY, 2019, The Future of Skin Toxicology Testing
               of  Polyelectrolyte  Chitosan-gelatin  Hydrogels  for  Skin   3D Bioprinting Meets Microfluidics. Int J Bioprint, 5:237.
               Bioprinting. Proc CIRP, 49:105–12.                  https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.237
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.09.002    34.  Worthington AM, 1877, XXVIII. On the Forms Assumed by
           23.  Ng  WL,  Yeong  WY, Naing MW, 2016, Polyelectrolyte   Drops  of  Liquids  Falling  Vertically  on  a  Horizontal  Plate.
               Gelatin-chitosan Hydrogel Optimized for 3D Bioprinting in   Proc R Soc London, 25:261–72.
               Skin Tissue Engineering. Int J Bioprint, 2:53–62.     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1876.0048
               https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.2016.01.009        35.  Thoroddsen  ST,  Etoh  TG,  Takehara  K,  2008,  High-Speed
           24.  Zhuang P, Ng  WL,  An  J,  et al., 2019, Layer-by-layer   Imaging  of Drops and  Bubbles.  Annu  Rev  Fluid  Mech,
               Ultraviolet Assisted Extrusion-Based (UAE) Bioprinting of   40:257–85.
               Hydrogel Constructs with High Aspect Ratio for Soft Tissue      https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102215
               Engineering Applications. PLoS One, 14:e0216776.  36.  Lepowsky  E,  Muradoglu  M,  Tasoglu  S,  2018,  Towards
               https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216776        Preserving Post-printing Cell  Viability and Improving the
           25.  Ng  WL,  Yeong  WY, Naing MW, 2014, Potential  of   Resolution: Past, Present, and Future of 3D Bioprinting
               Bioprinted Films for Skin Tissue Engineering. Proceedings   Theory. Bioprinting, 11:e00034.
               of the 1  International Conference on Progress in Additive      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00034
                     st
               Manufacturing, p441–6.                          37.  Tasoglu  S,  Kaynak  G,  Szeri AJ,  et al., 2010, Impact  of a
               https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-09-0446-3_065       Compound Droplet on a Flat Surface: A  Model for Single
           26.  Meng Z, He J, Li J, et al., 2020, Melt-based, Solvent-free   Cell Epitaxy. Phys Fluids, 22:082103.
               Additive Manufacturing  of Biodegradable  Polymeric      https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3475527
               Scaffolds  with  Designer  Microstructures  for  Tailored   38.  Nooranidoost  M,  Izbassarov  D,  Tasoglu  S,  et  al.,  2019, A
               Mechanical/Biological Properties and Clinical Applications.   Computational Study of Droplet-based Bioprinting: Effects
               Virtual Phys Prototyp, 15:417–44.                   of Viscoelasticity. Phys Fluids, 31:081901.
               https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2020.1808937       https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5108824
           27.  Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat Polymerization-  39.  Hendriks J, Visser CW, Henke S, et al., 2015, Optimizing Cell

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1        39
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58