Page 52 - IJB-8-2
P. 52
3D-Printed β-TCP scaffolds promote Osteogenic Differentiation of BMSCs in an m6A-Dependent Manner
35. Sathiyavimal S, Vasantharaj S, Oscar FL, et al., 2019, C3H10T1/2 Cells by Inducing Mild Endoplasmic Reticulum
Biosynthesis and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite and Stress via a Positive Feedback Loop with p-AMPK. Mol
its Composite (Hydroxyapatite-gelatin-chitosan-fibrin-bone Cells, 43:58–65.
Ash) for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Int J Biol 43. Zhang C, Chen Y, Sun B, et al., 2017, m6A Modulates
Macromol, 129:844–52. Haematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Specification.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.058 Nature, 549:273–6.
36. Beuriat PA, Lohkamp LN, Szathmari A, et al., 2019, Repair of https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23883
Cranial Bone Defects in Children Using Synthetic Hydroxyapatite 44. Zhang B, Wu Q, Li B, et al., 2020, m6A Regulator-
Cranioplasty (CustomBone). World Neurosurg, 129:e104–13. Mediated Methylation Modification Patterns and Tumor
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.052 Microenvironment Infiltration Characterization in Gastric
37. Zhang H, Zhou Y, Yu N, et al., 2019, Construction of Cancer. Mol Cancer, 19:53.
Vascularized Tissue-engineered Bone with Polylysine- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01170-0
modified Coral Hydroxyapatite and a Double Cell-sheet 45. Zhang Y, Gu X, Li D, et al., 2019, METTL3 Regulates
Complex to Repair a Large Radius Bone Defect in Rabbits. Osteoblast Differentiation and Inflammatory Response
Acta Biomater, 91:82–98. via Smad Signaling and MAPK Signaling. Int J Mol Sci,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.024 21:199.
38. Przekora A, Kazimierczak P, Wojcik M, 2021, Ex Vivo https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010199
Determination of Chitosan/Curdlan/Hydroxyapatite 46. Barbieri I, Tzelepis K, Pandolfini L, et al., 2017, Promoter-
Biomaterial Osseointegration with the Use of Human bound METTL3 Maintains Myeloid Leukaemia by m6A-
Trabecular Bone Explant: New Method for Biocompatibility dependent Translation Control. Nature, 552:126–31.
Testing of Bone Implants Reducing Animal Tests. Mater Sci https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24678
Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 119:111612. 47. Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111612 et al., 2012, Topology of the Human and Mouse m6A RNA
39. Putri TS, Hayashi K, Ishikawa K, 2020, Bone Regeneration Methylomes Revealed by m6A-seq. Nature, 485:201–6.
Using β-tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) block with https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11112
Interconnected Pores Made by Setting Reaction of β-TCP 48. Bartosovic M, Molares HC, Gregorova P, et al., 2017, N6-
Granules. J Biomed Mater Res A, 108:625–32. methyladenosine Demethylase FTO Targets pre-mRNAs
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36842 and Regulates Alternative Splicing and 3’-end Processing.
40. Zhang D, Gao P, Li Q, et al., Engineering Biomimetic Nucleic Acids Res, 45:11356–70.
Periosteum with β-TCP Scaffolds to Promote Bone Formation https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx778
in Calvarial Defects of Rats. Stem Cell Res Ther, 8:134. 49. Geula S, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Dominissini D, et al.,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0592-4 2015, Stem Cells. m6A mRNA Methylation Facilitates
41. Tian C, Huang Y, Li Q, et al., 2019, Mettl3 Regulates Resolution of Naïve Pluripotency toward Differentiation.
Osteogenic Differentiation and Alternative Splicing of Vegfa Science, 347:1002–6.
in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261417
20:551. 50. Kennedy EM, Bogerd HP, Kornepati AV, et al., 2017,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030551 Posttranscriptional m6A Editing of HIV-1 mRNAs Enhances
42. Son HE, Min HY, Kim EJ, et al., 2020, Fat Mass and Obesity- Viral Gene Expression. Cell Host Microbe, 22:830.
Associated (FTO) Stimulates Osteogenic Differentiation of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.11.010
Publisher’s note
Whioce Publishing remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
affiliations.
44 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 2

